Electric Penrose process in spherically symmetric regular black holes with and without a cosmological constant

This paper demonstrates that Ayón-Beato-García regular black holes, both with and without a cosmological constant, enable a significantly more efficient electric Penrose process with larger negative-energy regions and higher energy extraction efficiency compared to Reissner-Nordström black holes, even under astrophysically realistic conditions.

Original authors: Haowei Chen, Hengyu Xu, Yizhi Zhan, Shao-Jun Zhang

Published 2026-03-24
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine a black hole not as a terrifying, infinite vacuum cleaner, but as a cosmic power plant. For decades, physicists have known that if you spin a black hole fast enough, you can steal some of its energy to power the universe. This is the famous Penrose Process.

But there's a catch: to do this, the black hole needs to be spinning like a top. If it's just sitting there (non-rotating), the standard theory says you can't get any energy out.

This paper introduces a new, exciting way to "steal" energy from a stationary black hole, but with a twist: instead of using spin, we use electricity. And even better, the black holes we are looking at aren't the "standard" ones with a singularity (a point of infinite density where physics breaks down). They are "Regular" Black Holes—smooth, clean objects that don't have a broken center.

Here is the breakdown of their discovery, using simple analogies:

1. The Setup: The "Electric" Power Plant

In the old days, we thought black holes were neutral (no electric charge) because they would quickly lose any charge they had. But this paper asks: What if a black hole has a tiny bit of electric charge?

  • The Analogy: Imagine a black hole is a giant, charged balloon. If you throw a particle with the opposite charge at it, the balloon pulls it in. If you throw a particle with the same charge, the balloon pushes it away.
  • The Trick: The authors show that near a charged black hole, there is a special "zone" (like a force field) where particles can have negative energy.
  • The Heist: Imagine a particle flies into this zone and splits in two. One piece falls into the black hole with "negative energy" (effectively subtracting energy from the hole). The other piece flies away with more energy than the original particle had. The black hole loses a tiny bit of mass, and you get a massive energy boost. This is the Electric Penrose Process.

2. The New Contender: The "Smooth" Black Hole

Standard black holes (like the Reissner-Nordström model) have a "singularity" in the middle—a point where the math explodes and reality breaks. It's like a pothole in the road that is infinitely deep.

The authors studied a different type called the Ayón-Beato-García (ABG) Black Hole.

  • The Analogy: Think of a standard black hole as a donut with a hole in the middle that goes down to the center of the earth. The ABG black hole is like a donut where the hole is filled with a soft, smooth marshmallow. There is no "bottom" to fall into; the center is safe and smooth.
  • Why it matters: Because the center is smooth, the laws of physics don't break down. This paper is the first to ask: How does this smooth center change the energy theft?

3. The Big Discovery: The "Super-Zone"

The researchers compared the "Smooth" (ABG) black holes to the "Standard" (RN) black holes.

  • The Finding: The "Smooth" black holes have a much larger negative-energy zone.
  • The Analogy: Imagine the "negative energy zone" is a trapdoor in the floor of a room.
    • In a Standard Black Hole, the trapdoor is tiny, right next to the wall. You have to be incredibly close to the wall to fall through it.
    • In a Smooth (ABG) Black Hole, the trapdoor is huge! It covers half the room. You can fall through it from much further away.
  • The Result: Because the zone is bigger, you can steal energy from a much safer distance. You don't have to get as close to the dangerous event horizon to make the "heist" work.

4. The Efficiency: A 23-to-8 Advantage

The paper calculates how much energy you can get out.

  • Even if the black hole has a tiny, almost invisible amount of electric charge (which is realistic for the universe), the Smooth Black Hole is still a better power plant than the Standard one.
  • The Ratio: The efficiency of the Smooth Black Hole is roughly 23/8 (about 2.9 times) better than the Standard one.
  • The Metaphor: If the Standard Black Hole is a bicycle generator that gives you a weak spark, the Smooth Black Hole is a high-performance turbine that gives you a massive surge, even with the same amount of wind (charge).

5. Adding the "Cosmological Constant" (The Expanding Universe)

The paper also looked at what happens if the universe is expanding (adding a "Cosmological Constant").

  • The Twist: In this scenario, the "negative energy zone" doesn't just exist near the black hole; it also appears near the edge of the observable universe (the cosmological horizon).
  • The Result: You can potentially steal energy from two places: near the black hole AND near the edge of the universe. However, the Smooth Black Hole still wins, offering a larger zone for energy theft than the Standard version.

Summary: Why Should We Care?

This paper suggests that if regular black holes (the smooth kind) exist in our universe, they are super-efficient engines.

  1. They are safer: You can extract energy from further away.
  2. They are stronger: They can accelerate particles to higher speeds.
  3. They are distinct: Even with tiny amounts of charge, they behave differently enough from standard black holes that, in the future, we might be able to tell them apart by watching how they accelerate particles.

In short, the authors found that "smooth" black holes are the ultimate cosmic batteries, capable of powering the universe more efficiently than the "broken" ones we usually study.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →