Search for the electromagnetic Dalitz decays χcJe+eϕχ_{cJ}\to e^{+}e^{-}ϕ

Using a large sample of ψ(3686)\psi(3686) events collected by the BESIII detector, this study presents the first search for the rare electromagnetic Dalitz decays χcJe+eϕ\chi_{cJ} \to e^+e^-\phi (J=0,1,2J=0,1,2), finding no significant signals and establishing upper limits on their branching fractions at the 90% confidence level.

Original authors: BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, P. Adlarson, X. C. Ai, R. Aliberti, A. Amoroso, Q. An, Y. Bai, O. Bakina, Y. Ban, H. -R. Bao, V. Batozskaya, K. Begzsuren, N. Berger, M. Berlowski, M.
Published 2026-02-13
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The Big Picture: Hunting for a "Ghost" Particle Decay

Imagine you have a very expensive, high-speed camera (the BESIII detector) sitting at a giant particle collider (the BEPCII). This camera has taken millions of photos of a specific type of subatomic particle called the ψ(3686)\psi(3686).

In this paper, the scientists are looking for a very specific, rare event: a "ghost" decay. They are trying to catch a heavy particle called χc\chi_c (a cousin of the ψ\psi) as it transforms into three things at once:

  1. A ϕ\phi particle (a heavy, short-lived particle made of strange quarks).
  2. An electron (ee^-).
  3. A positron (e+e^+, the electron's antimatter twin).

This process is called an electromagnetic Dalitz decay. It's like watching a heavy ball break apart into a smaller ball and a pair of tiny sparks.

The Challenge: Finding a Needle in a Haystack

The scientists had a massive dataset: about 2.7 billion ψ(3686)\psi(3686) events. That's a lot of data! However, the decay they are looking for is incredibly rare.

  • The Analogy: Imagine you have a stadium full of people (the 2.7 billion events). You are looking for one specific person who is wearing a red hat, holding a blue balloon, and juggling three pineapples.
  • The Problem: Most people in the stadium are just wearing hats or holding balloons, but not that specific combination. Even worse, there are "fake" people who look almost exactly like your target (background noise), such as someone who dropped a balloon that bounced off a wall and looked like a second balloon.

How They Searched: The "Filter" Process

To find their target, the BESIII team built a series of digital filters (selection criteria):

  1. The Trackers: They looked for exactly four charged tracks (two electrons, two kaons from the ϕ\phi decay) and one photon.
  2. The ID Check: They used the detector's "ID cards" (Particle Identification) to make sure the tracks were actually electrons and kaons, and not pions or protons pretending to be them.
  3. The "Ghost" Veto: One of the biggest headaches was "photon conversion." Sometimes, a real photon hits a piece of metal in the detector and splits into an electron-positron pair. This looks exactly like the signal they want, but it's a fake. They built a special algorithm to spot these "ghosts" and throw them out.
  4. The Mass Window: They checked the "weight" (invariant mass) of the particles. If the combined weight of the electron-positron pair and the ϕ\phi matched the known weight of the χc\chi_c particle, it was a potential candidate.

The Result: The Great Silence

After running all these filters through their 2.7 billion events, the scientists looked at the final results.

  • What they expected: They hoped to see a little "bump" in the data—a cluster of events that didn't fit the background noise.
  • What they found: Nothing. Just a flat line. The number of events they saw was consistent with random background noise.

The Verdict: They did not find the χce+eϕ\chi_c \to e^+e^-\phi decay.

The Silver Lining: Setting the "Speed Limit"

Even though they didn't find the particle, the paper is still a huge success. In science, "not finding it" is valuable if you can say, "If it were there, it would have to be this rare."

The scientists calculated the Upper Limit. Think of this like a speed limit sign.

  • They can't say the decay happens 100% of the time.
  • They can't even say it happens 1 in a million times.
  • They can confidently say: "If this decay happens, it happens less than 1 time in every 4 million attempts."

They set these "speed limits" (upper limits on the branching fraction) for three different versions of the χc\chi_c particle (χc0\chi_{c0}, χc1\chi_{c1}, and χc2\chi_{c2}).

Why Does This Matter?

  1. First Time Ever: This is the first time anyone has ever looked for this specific type of decay in these specific particles. It's like exploring a new continent; even if you don't find gold, you've mapped the coastline.
  2. Testing the Rules: The decay involves a "virtual photon" (a photon that exists for a split second). The way this happens is governed by the laws of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) and Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). By setting these strict limits, they are testing if our current theories of how particles interact are correct.
  3. Future Hunting: Now that they know the decay is incredibly rare (or doesn't exist), future experiments with even bigger cameras (like a proposed "Super Tau-Charm Factory") will know exactly how sensitive they need to be to finally catch a glimpse of this ghost.

Summary in One Sentence

The BESIII collaboration used a massive dataset to hunt for a rare particle breakup that had never been seen before; while they didn't find it, they successfully proved that if it does exist, it is vanishingly rare, setting the stage for future, more powerful experiments to solve the mystery.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →