Searches for axion-like particles in proton-proton and ion-ion collisions at energies in the center of mass system of 5.02 TeV and 13 TeV

This paper presents a theoretical modeling of axion-like particle production and decay into photons in proton-proton and lead-lead collisions at 5.02 TeV and 13 TeV, utilizing Good-Walker eigenstate models to calculate cross-section dependencies on collision energy, ALP mass, and event numbers based on ATLAS light-by-light scattering data.

Original authors: T. V. Obikhod, S. B. Chernyshenko

Published 2026-02-24
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the universe is a giant, high-speed racetrack where tiny particles zoom around at nearly the speed of light. Physicists at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) crash these particles together to see what happens, hoping to find clues about the mysterious "dark matter" that makes up most of the universe but remains invisible to us.

This paper is like a detective's report from two scientists, T.V. Obikhod and S.B. Chernyshenko, who are trying to catch a ghost: a hypothetical particle called an Axion-Like Particle (ALP). They suspect these ALPs might be the dark matter we've been looking for.

Here is the story of their investigation, broken down into simple concepts:

1. The Setup: The "Light-Box" Collision

Usually, when physicists smash protons (the building blocks of atoms) or heavy lead ions together, it's like a massive demolition derby. Everything explodes, and it's hard to see anything clearly.

However, sometimes the particles don't hit head-on. They just graze past each other. The scientists call this an "ultra-peripheral collision."

  • The Analogy: Imagine two fast cars driving past each other on a highway. They don't crash, but their headlights flash so brightly that the light from one car hits the other. In this experiment, the "headlights" are actually intense clouds of energy (photons) surrounding the particles. When these light clouds collide, they can create new particles out of pure energy. This is called "light-by-light scattering."

2. The Suspect: The Axion-Like Particle (ALP)

The scientists are looking for a specific "ghost" that might appear when these light clouds collide.

  • What is it? An ALP is a theoretical particle that is very light and interacts weakly with normal matter. If it exists, it could be the "dark matter" holding galaxies together.
  • How do they find it? They can't see the ALP directly. Instead, they wait for it to be created and then immediately decay (break apart) into two flashes of light (gamma rays). It's like looking for a magician who vanishes instantly, leaving behind two sparkles.

3. The Investigation: Running the Simulation

The scientists didn't just wait in the lab; they used a powerful computer program called SuperChic to run millions of virtual collisions. Think of this as a video game simulator where they can tweak the rules to see what happens.

They looked at two types of crashes:

  1. Proton-Proton collisions: Like two small pebbles grazing past each other.
  2. Lead-Lead collisions: Like two massive boulders grazing past each other.

They tested two different "speeds" (energies):

  • 5.02 TeV: A very fast speed.
  • 13 TeV: An even faster, record-breaking speed.

4. The Findings: What the Computer Told Them

After crunching the numbers, the scientists found some interesting patterns:

  • The "Single vs. Double" Breakup: When the particles graze each other, sometimes one of them breaks apart (Single Dissociation) and sometimes both do (Double Dissociation).

    • The Result: The computer showed that it is much more likely (about 10 times more likely) for just one particle to break apart than for both to break apart. It's like if you flick a billiard ball; it's more likely to chip off a tiny piece than to shatter completely.
  • The Speed Trap (Energy Levels):

    • In Proton collisions: As they increased the speed (energy), the chance of creating an ALP went up. The faster they went, the more likely they were to find the ghost.
    • In Lead collisions: This was the surprise. As they increased the speed, the chance of creating an ALP went up at first, but then it started to drop when the energy got too high (between 7 and 8 TeV).
    • The Analogy: Imagine trying to catch a butterfly. If you run a little faster, you might catch it. But if you run too fast, the wind from your speed blows the butterfly away before you can grab it. In lead collisions, the "wind" (the complex interaction of the heavy nuclei) gets too strong at high speeds, making it harder to create the ALP.
  • The Weight Limit (Mass): They also checked if heavier ALPs were easier to find.

    • The Result: As the ALPs got heavier (up to 1,400 times the mass of a proton), the chance of finding them dropped dramatically—by a factor of one million (six orders of magnitude). It's much harder to create a heavy ghost than a light one.

5. The Conclusion: Are We Close?

The scientists compared their computer results with real data collected by the ATLAS collaboration (a huge team of physicists at the LHC).

  • The Good News: The number of "ghost sightings" (events) they predicted matches what the real experiments have seen so far (between 10 and 100 events). This means their theory is on the right track.
  • The Takeaway: While they haven't found the ALP yet, their calculations help narrow down the search. They know exactly where to look (in the 5 to 30 GeV mass range) and how the physics behaves when the particles are heavy lead ions versus light protons.

In summary: This paper is a roadmap. It tells us that while heavy particles (Lead) might make it harder to find these dark matter ghosts at very high speeds, the search is promising. The computer models confirm that the "ghosts" are hiding in a specific spot, and the real-world experiments are starting to see the same clues.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →