The absolute seawater entropy: Part I. Definition

This paper defines the absolute entropy of seawater by refining the TEOS10 formulation with updated thermodynamic tables and reference entropies, documenting the resulting differences from previous Millero-based calculations, and setting the stage for a subsequent analysis of observed oceanic profiles.

Original authors: Pascal Marquet

Published 2026-03-27✓ Author reviewed
📖 6 min read🧠 Deep dive

This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The Big Idea: Giving Seawater a 'True Zero for entropy'

Imagine you are trying to measure the height of mountains. For a long time, oceanographers and meteorologists have been measuring the height of mountains relative to sea level. If you say a mountain is "5,000 meters high," you are really saying it is "5,000 meters above sea level." This works fine for most things, like hiking or flying planes.

However, in physics, there is a concept called Entropy. Think of entropy as a measure of "disorder" or "messiness" in a system. The more mixed up the molecules are, the higher the entropy.

For decades, scientists calculated the entropy of seawater using a "relative" scale. They arbitrarily decided that at a specific temperature (0°C) and a specific saltiness (35 grams of salt per kilogram), the entropy is zero. It's like saying, "Let's pretend this specific mountain is sea level, and measure everything else from there."

The Problem: This "relative zero" is a made-up number. It doesn't reflect the true physical reality of the universe. Just as a mountain has a true height from the center of the Earth, seawater has a "true" entropy based on the laws of quantum mechanics and the Third Law of Thermodynamics.

The Solution: Dr. Marquet's paper is about calculating the "Absolute Entropy" of seawater. He wants to stop measuring from "Sea Level" and start measuring from the "Center of the Earth" (Absolute Zero).


The Analogy: The Bank Account vs. The Wallet

To understand why this matters, let's use a financial analogy.

  • The Old Way (Relative Entropy): Imagine you and your friend are comparing your bank balances. You both agree to ignore the first $1,000 in your accounts and just count what you have above that.

    • You have $1,500. Your "relative" balance is $500.
    • Your friend has $2,000. Their "relative" balance is $1,000.
    • This works fine if you are just comparing who has more right now. But if you want to know the total wealth of the universe, or if you want to calculate interest based on the total principal, ignoring that first $1,000 creates a mathematical error.
  • The New Way (Absolute Entropy): Dr. Marquet says, "Stop ignoring the first $1,000! Let's count every single penny from zero."

    • He takes one of the standard formulas used by oceanographers (called TEOS-10) and adds a "correction term." This term accounts for the "missing money" (the absolute reference values of pure water and sea salts) that was previously ignored.

Why Did They Ignore the "True Zero" Before?

For a long time, scientists thought, "Does it really matter?"

  • The Argument: Most things we measure in the ocean (like how dense the water is, how fast sound travels, or how much heat it holds) don't change if you shift the starting point of your entropy scale. It's like saying the difference in height between two mountains is the same whether you measure from sea level or from the center of the Earth.
  • The Flaw: Dr. Marquet argues that while the differences might look similar, the absolute values matter when you are doing complex calculations involving mixing, turbulence, and chemical reactions. By ignoring the true starting point, the old formulas (specifically those by Millero from the 1970s) were actually "broken" in subtle ways. They were calculating a "relative" messiness that didn't match the laws of physics.

The "Recipe" for the New Calculation

Dr. Marquet didn't throw away the old recipe (TEOS-10); he just added a missing ingredient.

  1. The Base: He uses the modern, highly accurate TEOS-10 software, which is the current gold standard for ocean physics.
  2. The Correction: He adds a specific "saltiness adjustment."
    • He calculated the true "messiness" (entropy) of pure water at 0°C.
    • He calculated the true "messiness" of sea salts at 0°C.
    • He found that the difference between these two values is huge.
  3. The Result: When you mix water and salt, the total entropy isn't just a simple average. Because the "true" entropy of salt is much lower than water, adding salt actually lowers the average entropy per kilogram of the mixture in a way the old formulas missed or underestimated.

Why Should You Care? (The "So What?")

You might ask, "I'm not a physicist; why does this matter?"

Dr. Marquet suggests that this isn't just about math; it changes how we understand the ocean's behavior:

  • The Ocean's "Weather": Just as the atmosphere has "isentropic" lines (lines of equal entropy that air follows), the ocean has them too. By using the absolute entropy, these lines shift. This means the "paths" ocean water takes as it moves, mixes, and circulates might be different than we thought.
  • Turbulence: When water swirls and mixes (turbulence), according to Richardson it follows the rules of entropy. If we use the wrong "zero point," our models of how heat and salt mix in the ocean are slightly off. This could affect climate models.
  • Chemistry: The "messiness" of water affects how chemicals dissolve and react. If the entropy baseline is wrong, our understanding of how carbon dioxide or other chemicals behave in the ocean could be inaccurate.

The "Aha!" Moment

The paper includes a fascinating comparison. The old formulas (Millero's) showed that as you add salt, the entropy goes up in a weird, increasing curve. Dr. Marquet's new calculation shows that as you add salt, the entropy actually goes down (because salt is "more ordered" than liquid water).

It's like realizing that if you add a perfectly organized deck of cards (salt) to a pile of scattered cards (water), the pile actually becomes more organized on average, not less. The old math missed this (or underestimated it) because it was looking at the wrong starting point.

Summary

Dr. Marquet's paper is a call to upgrade the "ruler" we use to measure the ocean's entropy.

  • Old Ruler: Starts at an arbitrary point (Sea Level). Good for simple comparisons, but physically incomplete.
  • New Ruler: Starts at the absolute bottom (Absolute Zero). It aligns with the fundamental laws of the universe (Quantum Mechanics and the Third Law of Thermodynamics).

By switching to this "Absolute Entropy," scientists can build more accurate models of how the ocean moves, mixes, and interacts with the atmosphere, potentially leading to better climate predictions and a deeper understanding of our planet's chemistry.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →