Prethermalization by Random Multipolar Driving on a 78-Qubit Superconducting Processor

Using a 78-qubit superconducting processor, researchers experimentally demonstrated long-lived prethermal phases in many-body systems driven by structured random multipolar protocols, revealing a doubly tunable heating suppression mechanism and observing non-equilibrium dynamics that exceed the capabilities of classical tensor-network simulations.

Original authors: Zheng-He Liu, Yu Liu, Gui-Han Liang, Cheng-Lin Deng, Keyang Chen, Yun-Hao Shi, Tian-Ming Li, Lv Zhang, Bing-Jie Chen, Cai-Ping Fang, Da'er Feng, Xu-Yang Gu, Yang He, Kaixuan Huang, Hao Li, Hao-Tian Li
Published 2026-02-06
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Zheng-He Liu, Yu Liu, Gui-Han Liang, Cheng-Lin Deng, Keyang Chen, Yun-Hao Shi, Tian-Ming Li, Lv Zhang, Bing-Jie Chen, Cai-Ping Fang, Da'er Feng, Xu-Yang Gu, Yang He, Kaixuan Huang, Hao Li, Hao-Tian Liu, Li Li, Zheng-Yang Mei, Zhen-Yu Peng, Jia-Cheng Song, Ming-Chuan Wang, Shuai-Li Wang, Ziting Wang, Yongxi Xiao, Minke Xu, Yue-Shan Xu, Yu Yan, Yi-Han Yu, Wei-Ping Yuan, Jia-Chi Zhang, Jun-Jie Zhao, Kui Zhao, Si-Yun Zhou, Zheng-An Wang, Xiaohui Song, Ye Tian, Florian Mintert, Johannes Knolle, Roderich Moessner, Yu-Ran Zhang, Pan Zhang, Zhongcheng Xiang, Dongning Zheng, Kai Xu, Hongzheng Zhao, Heng Fan

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine you have a giant, chaotic dance floor with 78 dancers (the qubits) holding hands in a grid. Normally, if you start playing music that changes randomly, the dancers would eventually get so excited and confused that they'd spin out of control, forget their original formation, and end up in a hot, messy, featureless crowd. In physics, we call this "heating up" to an "infinite temperature" state. It's the ultimate party crash where order is lost forever.

Usually, scientists try to stop this chaos by playing music on a perfect, repeating loop (like a metronome). But what if the music isn't a perfect loop? What if it's random? For a long time, scientists thought random music would always lead to a quick meltdown.

The Big Discovery
This paper reports on an experiment using a super-powerful quantum computer called "Chuang-tzu 2.0" (named after the ancient Chinese philosopher) that found a way to keep the dancers organized for a surprisingly long time, even with random music. They discovered a "prethermal" phase—a long, stable plateau where the system stays cool and ordered before eventually heating up.

The Secret Sauce: "Multipolar" Driving
The researchers didn't just play random notes; they played random notes with a specific, hidden structure. They call this Random Multipolar Driving (RMD).

Think of it like this:

  • Normal Random (Monopole): Imagine a DJ throwing darts at a playlist. The music is chaotic, and the dancers get confused immediately.
  • Dipolar (Level 1): The DJ starts pairing up the random songs. Every time a fast song plays, it's immediately followed by a slow song that cancels out the energy. The dancers wobble but don't fall over.
  • Quadrupolar (Level 2): The DJ gets even smarter. They group the songs into triplets or quadruplets, creating a complex rhythm where the chaos cancels itself out even better.

The more complex the grouping (the higher the "multipolar order"), the longer the dancers can stay organized. The paper shows that by increasing the speed of the music (frequency) and the complexity of these groupings, they can delay the "heat death" of the system for over 1,000 cycles of music.

The "Double Dial" Control
The most exciting part is that the researchers found they have two knobs to control how long the party lasts:

  1. Speed: How fast the music changes.
  2. Complexity: How many songs they group together to cancel out the chaos.

They found a universal rule: if you double the complexity of the grouping, the time before the system melts down increases dramatically. It's like finding a magic formula where the more complex your rhythm is, the longer your system survives.

Watching the Entanglement
In quantum physics, "entanglement" is like a secret telepathic link between dancers. As the system heats up, these links spread everywhere, connecting everyone to everyone else.

  • The researchers used a special camera (Quantum State Tomography) to watch these links form.
  • They saw that at first, the links only formed between neighbors (like a small circle of friends).
  • As time went on, the links spread to cover the whole room (the whole grid).
  • Crucially, they saw that the way these links spread wasn't uniform. Some parts of the dance floor stayed linked in a wavy, oscillating pattern, while others settled down. This "non-uniform" behavior is a new discovery that helps us understand how quantum systems behave in 2D space.

Why Classical Computers Couldn't Do This
The researchers tried to simulate this dance on a supercomputer using advanced math (tensor networks).

  • The Problem: As the dancers get more entangled, the math required to describe them grows exponentially. It's like trying to write down the instructions for a dance where every dancer is connected to every other dancer; the list of instructions becomes longer than the universe.
  • The Result: The supercomputer could only simulate the first few seconds of the dance before it ran out of memory and crashed.
  • The Win: The quantum processor (Chuang-tzu 2.0) didn't crash. It ran the full 1,000+ cycles. This proves that for certain complex, chaotic quantum problems, a quantum computer is simply better than any classical computer we have today.

In Summary
This paper shows that by using a clever, structured form of randomness, scientists can keep a large quantum system stable for a long time, preventing it from heating up and losing its information. They proved this on a 78-qubit chip, observed how the internal connections (entanglement) grow, and demonstrated that this specific quantum task is too hard for even the world's best supercomputers to simulate. It's a major step forward in understanding how to control quantum systems that are far from equilibrium.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →