Measurement of ψ(2S)ψ(2S) to J/ψJ/ψ cross-section ratio as function of multiplicity in ppPb collisions atsNN=8.16\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16 TeV

Using LHCb data from ppPb and Pbpp collisions at sNN=8.16\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16 TeV, this study measures the ψ(2S)\psi(2S) to J/ψJ/\psi production ratio as a function of multiplicity, revealing a multiplicity-dependent suppression for prompt charmonia in the Pb-going direction that suggests the presence of additional mechanisms, potentially related to quark-gluon plasma formation, beyond standard comover effects.

Original authors: LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij, A. S. W. Abdelmotteleb, C. Abellan Beteta, F. Abudinén, T. Ackernley, A. A. Adefisoye, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi, P. Adlarson, C. Agapopoulou, C. A. Aidala, Z. Ajaltouni, S. A
Published 2026-02-19
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine you are a detective trying to figure out what happens when two very different crowds collide. In this case, the "crowds" are subatomic particles: a single proton (a tiny, lonely traveler) smashing into a lead nucleus (a heavy, crowded city made of 200 protons and neutrons).

This paper, written by the LHCb collaboration at CERN, is about a specific mystery: How do heavy particles behave when they are born in these collisions, and does the size of the crowd around them change how they survive?

Here is the breakdown of the story, using simple analogies.

1. The Characters: The "Heavy Twins"

The scientists are studying two specific particles called charmonia. Think of them as heavy, exotic twins made of a "charm" quark and its anti-particle:

  • J/ψ (J/Psi): The "Ground State." Think of this as the strong, sturdy twin. It's tightly bound together, like a rock glued with super-strong epoxy. It's hard to break apart.
  • ψ(2S) (Psi-2S): The "Excited State." Think of this as the wobbly, fragile twin. It's the same type of particle, but it's vibrating with extra energy and is loosely bound, like a house of cards. It falls apart much easier if anything bumps into it.

2. The Experiment: The "High-Speed Crash"

The scientists fired protons at lead nuclei (and vice versa) at nearly the speed of light. They looked at two directions:

  • pPb (Proton hitting Lead): The proton is the "bullet," and the lead is the "target." The debris flies mostly in the direction of the lead (the "Pb-going" direction).
  • Pbp (Lead hitting Proton): The lead is the "bullet," and the proton is the "target." The debris flies mostly in the direction of the proton (the "p-going" direction).

They measured how many of the "fragile twins" (ψ(2S)) survived compared to the "sturdy twins" (J/ψ).

3. The Variable: The "Party Size" (Multiplicity)

The key to this experiment is multiplicity. In particle physics, this is just a fancy word for "how many other particles were created in the crash."

  • Low Multiplicity: A small, quiet party. Only a few particles are flying around.
  • High Multiplicity: A massive, chaotic mosh pit. Thousands of particles are flying everywhere.

The scientists wanted to see: Does the fragile twin die more often when the party gets bigger?

4. The Discovery: The "Forward-Backward" Mystery

The results were surprising and revealed a "split personality" in the data:

Scenario A: The Proton-Going Direction (The "Small System")
When the proton was the target (Pbp) or when looking at the proton side of the pPb collision:

  • What happened: As the party got bigger (more particles), the ratio of fragile twins to sturdy twins stayed the same.
  • The Analogy: Imagine a house of cards (fragile twin) and a rock (sturdy twin) in a room. As more people enter the room, the house of cards doesn't get knocked over any more than the rock does. The environment wasn't "hot" or "dense" enough to break the fragile one specifically.

Scenario B: The Lead-Going Direction (The "Big System")
When the lead nucleus was the target (pPb), specifically in the direction where the lead was heading:

  • What happened: As the party got bigger, the fragile twins disappeared much faster than the sturdy ones. The ratio dropped significantly.
  • The Analogy: Now, imagine that same house of cards and rock, but this time the room is filled with a boiling, super-dense fog (a "Quark-Gluon Plasma" or QGP). As the room gets more crowded, the fog becomes so thick and hot that it melts the house of cards, but the rock remains untouched.

5. The Big Conclusion: A "Mini-Black Hole" in a Small Room?

Usually, scientists only expect to see this "melting" effect in huge collisions, like smashing two giant lead nuclei together (PbPb), where a "soup" of free quarks and gluons (called Quark-Gluon Plasma) is formed. This soup is so hot it breaks apart the fragile particles.

The Shock: This paper suggests that even in a small collision (Proton vs. Lead), if you look in the right direction (the lead side) and the collision is "busy" enough (high multiplicity), you might be creating a tiny, short-lived drop of this super-hot plasma.

It's like finding a tiny, super-heated drop of lava in a snowball fight. You wouldn't expect lava in a snowball fight, but if the snowballs are packed tight enough, maybe a tiny bit of heat forms.

Why Does This Matter?

This helps us understand the transition between "small" and "large" worlds in physics.

  • It tells us that the rules of the universe change depending on how crowded things get.
  • It suggests that the "fragile" particles are excellent sensors. If they vanish, it means the environment got hot enough to melt them, hinting at the formation of a Quark-Gluon Plasma even in surprisingly small collisions.

In a nutshell: The scientists found that when a proton hits a lead nucleus, the "fragile" particles get crushed if the crash is messy and chaotic, but only if the crash happens in the direction of the heavy lead. This suggests that even small collisions can create tiny, super-hot "soups" of matter that we usually only see in the biggest crashes in the universe.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →