Search for the lepton-flavor-violating τe±\tau^{-} \rightarrow e^{\mp} \ell^{\pm} \ell^{\mp} decays at Belle II

Using 428 fb1^{-1} of data from the Belle II experiment, the authors performed a search for charged-lepton-flavor-violating τe±\tau^- \rightarrow e^\mp \ell^\pm \ell^- decays and established the most stringent upper limits to date on their branching fractions, ranging from $1.3$ to 2.5×1082.5 \times 10^{-8} at the 90% confidence level.

Original authors: Belle II Collaboration, I. Adachi, L. Aggarwal, H. Ahmed, Y. Ahn, H. Aihara, N. Akopov, S. Alghamdi, M. Alhakami, A. Aloisio, N. Althubiti, K. Amos, M. Angelsmark, N. Anh Ky, C. Antonioli, D. M. Asner
Published 2026-05-06
📖 4 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Belle II Collaboration, I. Adachi, L. Aggarwal, H. Ahmed, Y. Ahn, H. Aihara, N. Akopov, S. Alghamdi, M. Alhakami, A. Aloisio, N. Althubiti, K. Amos, M. Angelsmark, N. Anh Ky, C. Antonioli, D. M. Asner, H. Atmacan, V. Aushev, M. Aversano, R. Ayad, V. Babu, H. Bae, N. K. Baghel, S. Bahinipati, P. Bambade, Sw. Banerjee, S. Bansal, M. Barrett, M. Bartl, J. Baudot, A. Baur, A. Beaubien, F. Becherer, J. Becker, J. V. Bennett, F. U. Bernlochner, V. Bertacchi, M. Bertemes, E. Bertholet, M. Bessner, S. Bettarini, V. Bhardwaj, B. Bhuyan, F. Bianchi, T. Bilka, D. Biswas, A. Bobrov, D. Bodrov, A. Bondar, G. Bonvicini, J. Borah, A. Boschetti, A. Bozek, M. Bračko, P. Branchini, N. Brenny, T. E. Browder, A. Budano, S. Bussino, Q. Campagna, M. Campajola, L. Cao, G. Casarosa, C. Cecchi, M. -C. Chang, R. Cheaib, P. Cheema, C. Chen, L. Chen, B. G. Cheon, K. Chilikin, J. Chin, K. Chirapatpimol, H. -E. Cho, K. Cho, S. -J. Cho, S. -K. Choi, S. Choudhury, J. Cochran, I. Consigny, L. Corona, J. X. Cui, E. De La Cruz-Burelo, S. A. De La Motte, G. De Nardo, G. De Pietro, R. de Sangro, M. Destefanis, S. Dey, A. Di Canto, F. Di Capua, J. Dingfelder, Z. Doležal, I. Domínguez Jiménez, T. V. Dong, X. Dong, M. Dorigo, K. Dugic, G. Dujany, P. Ecker, D. Epifanov, J. Eppelt, R. Farkas, P. Feichtinger, T. Ferber, T. Fillinger, C. Finck, G. Finocchiaro, A. Fodor, F. Forti, A. Frey, B. G. Fulsom, A. Gabrielli, A. Gale, E. Ganiev, M. Garcia-Hernandez, R. Garg, G. Gaudino, V. Gaur, V. Gautam, A. Gaz, A. Gellrich, G. Ghevondyan, D. Ghosh, H. Ghumaryan, G. Giakoustidis, R. Giordano, A. Giri, P. Gironella Gironell, A. Glazov, B. Gobbo, R. Godang, O. Gogota, P. Goldenzweig, W. Gradl, E. Graziani, D. Greenwald, Z. Gruberová, Y. Guan, K. Gudkova, I. Haide, Y. Han, T. Hara, C. Harris, K. Hayasaka, H. Hayashii, S. Hazra, C. Hearty, M. T. Hedges, A. Heidelbach, G. Heine, I. Heredia de la Cruz, M. Hernández Villanueva, T. Higuchi, M. Hoek, M. Hohmann, R. Hoppe, P. Horak, C. -L. Hsu, T. Iijima, K. Inami, G. Inguglia, N. Ipsita, A. Ishikawa, R. Itoh, M. Iwasaki, P. Jackson, D. Jacobi, W. W. Jacobs, D. E. Jaffe, E. -J. Jang, Q. P. Ji, S. Jia, Y. Jin, A. Johnson, K. K. Joo, H. Junkerkalefeld, D. Kalita, A. B. Kaliyar, J. Kandra, K. H. Kang, G. Karyan, T. Kawasaki, F. Keil, C. Ketter, M. Khan, C. Kiesling, C. -H. Kim, D. Y. Kim, J. -Y. Kim, K. -H. Kim, Y. J. Kim, Y. -K. Kim, H. Kindo, K. Kinoshita, P. Kodyš, T. Koga, S. Kohani, K. Kojima, A. Korobov, S. Korpar, E. Kovalenko, R. Kowalewski, P. Križan, P. Krokovny, T. Kuhr, Y. Kulii, D. Kumar, J. Kumar, R. Kumar, K. Kumara, T. Kunigo, A. Kuzmin, Y. -J. Kwon, S. Lacaprara, K. Lalwani, T. Lam, L. Lanceri, J. S. Lange, T. S. Lau, M. Laurenza, R. Leboucher, F. R. Le Diberder, M. J. Lee, C. Lemettais, P. Leo, P. M. Lewis, H. -J. Li, L. K. Li, Q. M. Li, S. X. Li, W. Z. Li, Y. Li, Y. B. Li, Y. P. Liao, J. Libby, J. Lin, S. Lin, V. Lisovskyi, M. H. Liu, Q. Y. Liu, Y. Liu, Z. Q. Liu, D. Liventsev, S. Longo, T. Lueck, C. Lyu, Y. Ma, C. Madaan, M. Maggiora, S. P. Maharana, R. Maiti, G. Mancinelli, R. Manfredi, E. Manoni, M. Mantovano, D. Marcantonio, S. Marcello, C. Marinas, C. Martellini, A. Martens, A. Martini, T. Martinov, L. Massaccesi, M. Masuda, D. Matvienko, S. K. Maurya, M. Maushart, J. A. McKenna, R. Mehta, F. Meier, D. Meleshko, M. Merola, C. Miller, M. Mirra, S. Mitra, K. Miyabayashi, H. Miyake, R. Mizuk, G. B. Mohanty, S. Mondal, S. Moneta, A. L. Moreira de Carvalho, H. -G. Moser, I. Nakamura, M. Nakao, Y. Nakazawa, M. Naruki, Z. Natkaniec, A. Natochii, M. Nayak, G. Nazaryan, M. Neu, S. Nishida, S. Ogawa, R. Okubo, H. Ono, Y. Onuki, G. Pakhlova, A. Panta, S. Pardi, K. Parham, H. Park, J. Park, K. Park, S. -H. Park, B. Paschen, A. Passeri, S. Patra, S. Paul, T. K. Pedlar, I. Peruzzi, R. Peschke, R. Pestotnik, M. Piccolo, L. E. Piilonen, P. L. M. Podesta-Lerma, T. Podobnik, S. Pokharel, A. Prakash, C. Praz, S. Prell, E. Prencipe, M. T. Prim, S. Privalov, H. Purwar, P. Rados, G. Raeuber, S. Raiz, V. Raj, K. Ravindran, J. U. Rehman, M. Reif, S. Reiter, M. Remnev, L. Reuter, D. Ricalde Herrmann, I. Ripp-Baudot, G. Rizzo, S. H. Robertson, J. M. Roney, A. Rostomyan, N. Rout, L. Salutari, D. A. Sanders, S. Sandilya, L. Santelj, V. Savinov, B. Scavino, J. Schmitz, S. Schneider, M. Schnepf, K. Schoenning, C. Schwanda, A. J. Schwartz, Y. Seino, A. Selce, K. Senyo, J. Serrano, M. E. Sevior, C. Sfienti, W. Shan, G. Sharma, X. D. Shi, T. Shillington, T. Shimasaki, J. -G. Shiu, D. Shtol, A. Sibidanov, F. Simon, J. B. Singh, J. Skorupa, R. J. Sobie, M. Sobotzik, A. Soffer, A. Sokolov, E. Solovieva, W. Song, S. Spataro, B. Spruck, M. Starič, P. Stavroulakis, S. Stefkova, L. Stoetzer, R. Stroili, Y. Sue, M. Sumihama, K. Sumisawa, N. Suwonjandee, H. Svidras, M. Takahashi, M. Takizawa, U. Tamponi, K. Tanida, F. Tenchini, A. Thaller, O. Tittel, R. Tiwary, E. Torassa, K. Trabelsi, F. F. Trantou, I. Tsaklidis, I. Ueda, T. Uglov, K. Unger, Y. Unno, K. Uno, S. Uno, P. Urquijo, Y. Ushiroda, S. E. Vahsen, R. van Tonder, K. E. Varvell, M. Veronesi, A. Vinokurova, V. S. Vismaya, L. Vitale, V. Vobbilisetti, R. Volpe, A. Vossen, M. Wakai, S. Wallner, M. -Z. Wang, X. L. Wang, A. Warburton, M. Watanabe, S. Watanuki, C. Wessel, E. Won, X. P. Xu, B. D. Yabsley, S. Yamada, W. Yan, W. C. Yan, S. B. Yang, J. Yelton, K. Yi, J. H. Yin, K. Yoshihara, C. Z. Yuan, J. Yuan, L. Zani, F. Zeng, M. Zeyrek, B. Zhang, V. Zhilich, J. S. Zhou, Q. D. Zhou, L. Zhu, R. Žlebčík

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The Great Particle Hunt: A Story of Rare Tau Decay

Imagine the universe as a giant, bustling party where particles are the guests. Most guests follow strict rules: a "Tau" guest is supposed to leave the party in a very specific, predictable way, turning into other particles that look exactly like its family members. This is the "Standard Model" of physics—the rulebook everyone expects everyone to follow.

But what if a Tau guest broke the rules? What if, instead of turning into its usual family, it suddenly transformed into a mix of electrons and muons that it shouldn't be able to produce? This is called Lepton-Flavor Violation (LFV). Finding this would be like seeing a cat suddenly give birth to a puppy. It would prove that our rulebook is incomplete and that there are hidden, new laws of physics at play.

This paper is a report from the Belle II experiment, a massive particle detector in Japan, describing their latest attempt to catch these "rule-breaking" Tau particles in the act.

The Setup: A High-Stakes Game of Hide-and-Seek

The scientists used the SuperKEKB collider, which smashes electrons and positrons together at incredibly high speeds. These collisions create pairs of Tau particles. The team analyzed data from 428 "inverse femtobarns" of collisions (a unit of measurement that roughly translates to 393 million Tau pairs produced).

Their goal was to find five specific, forbidden ways a Tau could decay:

  1. τee+e\tau \to e^- e^+ e^- (Three electrons)
  2. τee+μ\tau \to e^- e^+ \mu^- (Two electrons, one muon)
  3. τeμ+e\tau \to e^- \mu^+ e^- (Two electrons, one muon, different charge)
  4. τμμ+e\tau \to \mu^- \mu^+ e^- (Two muons, one electron)
  5. τμe+μ\tau \to \mu^- e^+ \mu^- (Two muons, one electron, different charge)

The Challenge: Finding a Needle in a Haystack

The problem is that these "forbidden" decays are incredibly rare. If they happen at all, they happen maybe once in every 100 million Taus. Meanwhile, the "normal" decays happen constantly, creating a mountain of background noise.

To find the signal, the scientists had to build a sophisticated filter:

  • The "Inclusive Tagging" Net: They looked at one Tau particle in the pair to identify what it was doing. If they could confirm one Tau behaved normally, they could focus their attention on its partner, the "signal candidate."
  • The "Smart Bouncer" (BDT): They used a computer program called a Boosted Decision Tree (BDT). Think of this as a highly trained bouncer at a club. The BDT was trained on millions of simulated events and real data to recognize the subtle differences between a "rule-breaking" Tau and a normal background event. It looked at things like the energy of the particles, their angles, and how they moved together.
  • The "Blind Box": To ensure they didn't accidentally trick themselves into seeing patterns that weren't there, the scientists kept the most critical part of the data "blinded" (hidden) until they finalized their search strategy. This is like solving a puzzle without looking at the picture on the box until you've finished the pieces.

The Results: Silence is Golden

After running their filters and checking the data, the result was silence.

  • No "Puppies" Found: They did not find a single instance of a Tau breaking the rules in any of the five modes they searched.
  • Setting the Limits: Even though they didn't find the forbidden decays, they didn't come up empty-handed. Because they looked so hard and had so much data, they could set a very strict "speed limit" on how often these events could be happening.

They calculated that if these decays do happen, they occur less than 1.3 to 2.5 times in every 100 million Tau decays.

Why This Matters

Before this study, the best limits on four of these five modes were set by previous experiments. The Belle II team has now tightened those limits, making them the strictest in the world for four of the five scenarios.

In the world of particle physics, "not finding" something is often just as important as finding it. By proving that these decays are even rarer than we thought, the scientists are narrowing down the list of possible new theories. It's like telling a detective, "We know the thief didn't use a red car, a blue car, or a green car," which helps them focus on the remaining suspects.

In short: The Belle II team looked at hundreds of millions of particle collisions with high-tech filters and smart computer algorithms. They found no evidence of Tau particles breaking the laws of physics, but they successfully proved that if such a crime is happening, it is incredibly rare—ruling out many potential "new physics" theories in the process.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →