Measurement of the ratio of the Bc+_\mathrm{c}^+ \to J/ψ\psiτ+ντ\tau^+\nu_\tau and Bc+_\mathrm{c}^+ \to J/ψ\psi μ+νμ\mu^+\nu_\mu branching fractions using three-prong τ\tau lepton decays

Using proton-proton collision data collected by the CMS experiment at 13 TeV, this study measures the ratio of Bc+J/ψτ+ντB_c^+ \to J/\psi \tau^+\nu_\tau to Bc+J/ψμ+νμB_c^+ \to J/\psi \mu^+\nu_\mu branching fractions via three-prong τ\tau decays, finding a combined result consistent with the Standard Model prediction and providing no evidence for lepton flavor universality violation.

Original authors: CMS Collaboration

Published 2026-06-16
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: CMS Collaboration

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The Big Picture: A Cosmic Tug-of-War

Imagine the universe has a set of strict rules called the Standard Model. Think of this rulebook like the rulebook for a very complex board game. One of the most important rules in this game is Lepton Flavor Universality.

In plain English, this rule says: "The heavy particles (like the Tau) and the light particles (like the Muon) should behave exactly the same way, just scaled down by their weight." It's like saying if you drop a bowling ball and a tennis ball in a vacuum, they should fall at the exact same speed. If the bowling ball suddenly fell slower or faster than the tennis ball, it would mean there is a hidden force or a new rule we don't know about yet.

This paper is a report card from the CMS experiment at CERN (the Large Hadron Collider), checking if the "bowling balls" (Taus) and "tennis balls" (Muons) are playing fair.

The Experiment: Catching a Rare Decay

The scientists are looking at a specific particle called the Bc+B_c^+ meson. You can think of this particle as a very unstable, short-lived "parent" that loves to break apart.

When it breaks apart, it usually produces:

  1. A J/ψJ/\psi particle (which quickly turns into two muons, like a pair of twins).
  2. A neutrino (a ghost particle that is invisible).
  3. Either a Muon (the light particle) OR a Tau (the heavy particle).

The scientists want to measure the ratio: How often does the parent choose the heavy Tau compared to the light Muon?

  • The Prediction: The Standard Model rulebook says the Tau should be chosen about 26% as often as the Muon (because it's heavier and harder to produce).
  • The Mystery: Another team (LHCb) previously found a ratio of 71%, which is way higher than the rulebook predicts. This hinted that the rules might be broken.

The New Method: The "Three-Prong" Detective Work

In this new paper, the CMS team looked at the data from 2016 to 2018 (a massive amount of data, equivalent to 138 "inverse femtobarns"—a unit of collision volume).

They focused on a specific way the Tau particle decays.

  • The Old Way: They looked for Taus that turned into a Muon (like a shape-shifter).
  • The New Way: They looked for Taus that turned into three charged pions (three little particles flying out). This is called a "three-prong" decay.

The Analogy:
Imagine you are trying to find a specific type of rare bird in a forest.

  • The Muons are easy to spot; they are like bright red parrots.
  • The Taus are shy. Sometimes they turn into a red parrot (the old method), but sometimes they turn into a flock of three blue jays (the new "three-prong" method).
  • The forest is full of other birds (background noise) that look like blue jays.

The CMS team built a sophisticated "bird-watching filter" (a computer algorithm called a Boosted Decision Tree or BDT). This filter looks at the flight patterns, speed, and direction of the birds to separate the real "three-blue-jay" Taus from the fake ones.

The Results: The Rules Hold Up

After sifting through millions of collisions and using their high-tech filter, the scientists counted the results:

  1. The Raw Ratio: When looking only at the "three-prong" (three blue jay) method, the ratio came out to be 1.04. This looks weirdly high! It suggests the heavy Tau is being chosen just as often as the light Muon.
  2. The Combined Result: However, science is about checking your work. The team combined this new "three-prong" result with their previous "red parrot" (leptonic) result.
  3. The Final Verdict: When they put both methods together, the final ratio was 0.49.

What does this mean?

  • The Standard Model predicted 0.258.
  • The LHCb team previously found 0.71 (which was suspicious).
  • The CMS team found 0.49.

While 0.49 is higher than the prediction, the "uncertainty" (the margin of error) is quite large. The result is consistent with the Standard Model. In other words, the data is not precise enough to say the rules are broken. It's like measuring a runner's time and getting "somewhere between 9 and 11 seconds." The rulebook says they should run 9.5 seconds. Your measurement includes 9.5, so you can't claim they broke the record yet.

The Conclusion

The paper concludes that no evidence of "Lepton Flavor Universality violation" was found.

To use a final metaphor: The universe is like a giant,精密 (precision) clock. Some people thought they heard a "tick" that was out of rhythm (the LHCb result). This new paper is another person listening to the clock with a different ear (the three-prong method). They heard a slightly different rhythm, but when they combined their ears, the clock still sounded like it was ticking according to the original design.

The Standard Model remains the best description we have, and the "heavy" and "light" particles are still playing by the same rules, within the limits of our current measurement tools.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →