Observation of the radiative decay Ds(2317)+DsγD_s (2317)^+ \to D_s^* γ

Using combined data from the Belle and Belle II experiments, researchers have observed the radiative decay Ds0(2317)+Ds+γD^{*}_{s0}(2317)^{+} \to D_{s}^{*+} \gamma for the first time with high significance and measured its branching fraction ratio relative to the Ds+π0D_{s}^{+} \pi^{0} mode, providing crucial new constraints on the particle's internal quark structure.

Original authors: Belle II Collaboration, M. Abumusabh, I. Adachi, L. Aggarwal, H. Ahmed, Y. Ahn, H. Aihara, N. Akopov, S. Alghamdi, M. Alhakami, A. Aloisio, N. Althubiti, K. Amos, N. Anh Ky, C. Antonioli, D. M. Asner
Published 2026-06-18
📖 4 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Belle II Collaboration, M. Abumusabh, I. Adachi, L. Aggarwal, H. Ahmed, Y. Ahn, H. Aihara, N. Akopov, S. Alghamdi, M. Alhakami, A. Aloisio, N. Althubiti, K. Amos, N. Anh Ky, C. Antonioli, D. M. Asner, H. Atmacan, T. Aushev, R. Ayad, V. Babu, N. K. Baghel, S. Bahinipati, P. Bambade, Sw. Banerjee, M. Barrett, M. Bartl, J. Baudot, A. Beaubien, J. Becker, J. V. Bennett, F. U. Bernlochner, V. Bertacchi, M. Bertemes, E. Bertholet, M. Bessner, S. Bettarini, F. Bianchi, T. Bilka, D. Biswas, A. Bobrov, D. Bodrov, A. Bondar, G. Bonvicini, J. Borah, A. Boschetti, A. Bozek, M. Bračko, P. Branchini, R. A. Briere, T. E. Browder, A. Budano, S. Bussino, Q. Campagna, M. Campajola, G. Casarosa, C. Cecchi, P. Chang, P. Cheema, L. Chen, B. G. Cheon, C. Cheshta, H. Chetri, K. Chilikin, K. Chirapatpimol, H. -E. Cho, K. Cho, S. -J. Cho, S. -K. Choi, S. Choudhury, S. Chutia, J. A. Colorado-Caicedo, I. Consigny, L. Corona, J. X. Cui, E. De La Cruz-Burelo, S. A. De La Motte, G. De Nardo, G. De Pietro, R. de Sangro, M. Destefanis, S. Dey, A. Di Canto, Z. Doležal, I. Domínguez Jiménez, T. V. Dong, X. Dong, M. Dorigo, G. Dujany, P. Ecker, J. Eppelt, R. Farkas, P. Feichtinger, T. Ferber, T. Fillinger, C. Finck, G. Finocchiaro, F. Forti, B. G. Fulsom, A. Gabrielli, E. Ganiev, M. Garcia-Hernandez, R. Garg, G. Gaudino, V. Gaur, V. Gautam, A. Gaz, A. Gellrich, G. Ghevondyan, D. Ghosh, H. Ghumaryan, R. Giordano, A. Giri, P. Gironella Gironell, A. Glazov, B. Gobbo, R. Godang, O. Gogota, P. Goldenzweig, W. Gradl, E. Graziani, D. Greenwald, K. Gudkova, I. Haide, Y. Han, H. Hayashii, S. Hazra, C. Hearty, M. T. Hedges, G. Heine, I. Heredia de la Cruz, T. Higuchi, M. Hoek, M. Hohmann, R. Hoppe, P. Horak, X. T. Hou, C. -L. Hsu, A. Huang, T. Humair, T. Iijima, N. Ipsita, A. Ishikawa, R. Itoh, M. Iwasaki, D. Jacobi, W. W. Jacobs, E. -J. Jang, Q. P. Ji, S. Jia, Y. Jin, A. Johnson, J. Kandra, K. H. Kang, S. Kang, G. Karyan, F. Keil, C. Kiesling, D. Y. Kim, J. -Y. Kim, K. -H. Kim, H. Kindo, K. Kinoshita, P. Kodyš, T. Koga, S. Kohani, A. Korobov, S. Korpar, E. Kovalenko, R. Kowalewski, P. Križan, P. Krokovny, T. Kuhr, D. Kumar, K. Kumara, T. Kunigo, A. Kuzmin, Y. -J. Kwon, S. Lacaprara, T. Lam, J. S. Lange, T. S. Lau, M. Laurenza, R. Leboucher, F. R. Le Diberder, H. Lee, M. J. Lee, C. Lemettais, P. Leo, P. M. Lewis, C. Li, H. -J. Li, L. K. Li, Q. M. Li, S. X. Li, W. Z. Li, Y. Li, Y. B. Li, Y. P. Liao, J. Libby, J. Lin, V. Lisovskyi, M. H. Liu, Q. Y. Liu, Z. Q. Liu, D. Liventsev, S. Longo, A. Lozar, T. Lueck, C. Lyu, J. L. Ma, Y. Ma, M. Maggiora, S. P. Maharana, R. Maiti, G. Mancinelli, R. Manfredi, M. Mantovano, D. Marcantonio, M. Marfoli, C. Marinas, C. Martellini, A. Martens, T. Martinov, L. Massaccesi, M. Masuda, D. Matvienko, M. Maushart, J. A. McKenna, Z. Mediankin Gruberová, R. Mehta, F. Meier, D. Meleshko, M. Merola, C. Miller, M. Mirra, H. Miyake, R. Mizuk, G. B. Mohanty, S. Moneta, H. -G. Moser, I. Nakamura, M. Nakao, M. Naruki, Z. Natkaniec, A. Natochii, M. Nayak, S. Nishida, R. Nomaru, S. Ogawa, H. Ono, F. Otani, G. Pakhlova, A. Panta, S. Pardi, K. Parham, J. Park, S. -H. Park, A. Passeri, S. Patra, S. Paul, T. K. Pedlar, R. Pestotnik, M. Piccolo, L. E. Piilonen, P. L. M. Podesta-Lerma, T. Podobnik, C. Praz, S. Prell, M. T. Prim, S. Privalov, H. Purwar, P. Rados, S. Raiz, K. Ravindran, J. U. Rehman, M. Reif, S. Reiter, L. Reuter, D. Ricalde Herrmann, I. Ripp-Baudot, G. Rizzo, S. H. Robertson, J. M. Roney, A. Rostomyan, S. Saha, L. Salutari, D. A. Sanders, L. Santelj, C. Santos, V. Savinov, B. Scavino, S. Schneider, K. Schoenning, C. Schwanda, Y. Seino, K. Senyo, J. Serrano, C. Sfienti, W. Shan, G. Sharma, C. P. Shen, X. D. Shi, T. Shillington, J. -G. Shiu, D. Shtol, B. Shwartz, A. Sibidanov, F. Simon, J. Skorupa, R. J. Sobie, M. Sobotzik, A. Soffer, A. Sokolov, E. Solovieva, S. Spataro, K. Špenko, B. Spruck, M. Starič, P. Stavroulakis, R. Stroili, M. Sumihama, S. S. Tang, K. Tanida, F. Tenchini, F. Testa, A. Thaller, T. Tien Manh, O. Tittel, R. Tiwary, E. Torassa, K. Trabelsi, F. F. Trantou, I. Ueda, K. Unger, Y. Unno, K. Uno, S. Uno, P. Urquijo, Y. Ushiroda, S. E. Vahsen, R. van Tonder, K. E. Varvell, M. Veronesi, V. S. Vismaya, L. Vitale, V. Vobbilisetti, R. Volpe, M. Wakai, S. Wallner, M. -Z. Wang, A. Warburton, M. Watanabe, S. Watanuki, C. Wessel, E. Won, X. P. Xu, B. D. Yabsley, W. Yan, J. Yelton, K. Yi, J. H. Yin, K. Yoshihara, J. Yuan, Y. Yusa, L. Zani, M. Zeyrek, J. S. Zhou, Q. D. Zhou, L. Zhu, R. Žlebčík

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the universe is a giant, high-speed factory where tiny building blocks called particles are constantly being smashed together and reassembled. Inside this factory, there are special "mystery boxes" made of heavy particles called charm and strange quarks. One of these mystery boxes is named Ds0(2317)+D^*_{s0}(2317)^+.

For decades, physicists have been trying to figure out exactly what's inside this box. Is it a simple pair of particles stuck together (like a standard Lego brick)? Or is it a complex, fluffy cloud of particles stuck together like a molecular structure (like a marshmallow)? The problem is that this box is lighter than scientists expected, which makes it very hard to categorize.

The Big Discovery

In this new study, a massive team of scientists from the Belle and Belle II collaborations (working at giant particle accelerators in Japan) finally solved a piece of the puzzle. They watched this mystery box decay, or "break apart," for the very first time in a specific way.

Think of the mystery box as a fragile glass vase. Usually, when it breaks, it shatters into a specific set of pieces (a DsD_s meson and a neutral pion). The scientists knew this happened. But they were looking for a different, rarer type of breakage: one where the vase emits a flash of light (a photon) and turns into a slightly different, heavier version of itself (DsD^*_s).

The Result: They found this "flash of light" breakage! They saw it happen so clearly that the odds of it being a random accident are less than one in a billion (a statistical significance of over 10 standard deviations). It's like finally hearing a whisper in a hurricane.

How They Did It

To catch this rare event, the scientists acted like detectives with a massive magnifying glass:

  1. The Crime Scene: They used data from billions of particle collisions, essentially sifting through a mountain of debris.
  2. The Clues: They looked for specific combinations of particles (like a K+K^+, KK^-, and π+\pi^+) that act as fingerprints for the decay.
  3. The Filter: They had to be very careful to ignore "fake" clues. For example, sometimes two random particles might accidentally look like the signal they were hunting. They used advanced computer models to predict what the background noise would look like and subtracted it, leaving only the true signal.

What This Means for the Mystery

The most important part of the paper isn't just that they found the decay, but how often it happened compared to the usual breakage.

They measured a ratio:

  • The Usual Break: The box breaking into a standard set of pieces.
  • The Rare Flash: The box breaking and emitting a flash of light.

They found that for every 100 times the box breaks the usual way, it flashes about 7 times the rare way.

Why does this number matter?
Think of the different theories about the box's structure as different recipes for a cake:

  • Recipe A (Molecular): Suggests the box is a fluffy, loose cloud. This recipe predicts the "flash" should happen very rarely (less than 4% of the time).
  • Recipe B (Standard Quark): Suggests the box is a tight, solid brick. This recipe predicts the "flash" should happen more often (over 8% of the time).

The scientists measured the flash rate at 7.13%.

  • This number is too high for the "fluffy cloud" (molecular) theory.
  • It is too low for the "solid brick" (standard quark) theory.
  • However, it matches perfectly with some very specific, more complex theories (like the "light front quark model").

The Bottom Line

This paper is like finding a single, perfect fingerprint at a crime scene that rules out half the suspects. By measuring exactly how often this particle emits a flash of light, the scientists have provided a crucial piece of evidence that helps rule out some theories about what the Ds0(2317)+D^*_{s0}(2317)^+ is made of.

They haven't solved the entire mystery of the particle's nature yet, but they have handed the theoretical physicists a very precise clue that will help them narrow down the list of possible explanations. It's a major step forward in understanding the hidden rules of how matter is built.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →