From information bounds to infrared gravity: implications of Sharma-Mittal entropy

This paper demonstrates that the two-parameter Sharma-Mittal entropy framework unifies black hole thermodynamics and information theory to derive modified gravitational laws that naturally reproduce a MOND-like regime, offering a potential alternative explanation for dark matter phenomena.

Original authors: Abdelhakim Benkrane, Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano, Ahmad Sheykhi

Published 2026-06-16
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Abdelhakim Benkrane, Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano, Ahmad Sheykhi

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the universe as a giant, cosmic computer. For a long time, scientists thought the "hard drive" of this computer (space and time) worked in a very standard, predictable way. But recently, researchers have started wondering if the rules of information and heat might actually be the source of gravity itself.

This paper by Benkrane, Luciano, and Sheykhi explores a new, more flexible set of rules for how information is stored in the universe, specifically around black holes. They use a mathematical tool called Sharma–Mittal (SM) entropy.

Here is a breakdown of their findings using simple analogies:

1. The "Universal Remote" of Entropy

Think of the standard way we measure information (called Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy) as a basic TV remote with fixed buttons. Scientists previously found two "upgraded" remotes: the Rényi remote and the Tsallis remote. These work differently when dealing with huge, complex systems like black holes.

The authors introduce the Sharma–Mittal (SM) entropy as a "Universal Remote." It has two adjustable dials (parameters).

  • If you turn one dial, it acts exactly like the Rényi remote.
  • If you turn the other, it acts like the Tsallis remote.
  • If you set them just right, it acts like the standard remote.

The paper asks: "What happens to gravity if we use this Universal Remote instead of the old, fixed one?"

2. The Black Hole "Weight Limit" (The Bekenstein Bound)

There is a famous rule in physics called the Bekenstein bound. Imagine it as a strict weight limit on an elevator. No matter how much information (people) you try to pack into a black hole (the elevator), there is a maximum amount of "stuff" it can hold based on its size and energy.

The researchers checked if their Universal Remote respects this weight limit.

  • The Result: Yes, it does, but only if the two dials on the remote are set within a specific "safe zone." If you turn the dials too far in certain directions, the math breaks the rules of physics. This tells us that the universe is picky; it won't allow just any random way of counting information.

3. Erasing a Bit of Information Costs Energy

There is a principle called Landauer's Principle. It says that if you want to delete a single "bit" of information (like pressing the "delete" key on a computer), you must waste a tiny amount of energy as heat. You can't delete things for free.

The authors applied this to black holes. They asked: "If a black hole deletes one bit of information, how much does its mass change?"

  • The Result: In the old standard model, the mass change is predictable. With the SM Universal Remote, the mass change depends on the settings of the two dials.
    • In some settings, the black hole loses mass slower than expected.
    • In other settings, it loses mass faster.
    • This suggests that the "cost" of deleting information isn't the same for every black hole; it depends on the hidden "texture" of the universe's information storage.

4. Gravity as an "Emergent" Force

The paper uses a theory by physicist Erik Verlinde, which suggests gravity isn't a fundamental force (like magnetism) but something that emerges from information, much like how "wetness" emerges from the movement of many water molecules.

When they used the SM entropy to calculate gravity:

  • Close up: Gravity looks exactly like Newton's classic laws (what we learn in school).
  • Far away: Gravity starts to behave differently. The "Universal Remote" predicts that at very large distances (like across a galaxy), gravity gets stronger or weaker than Newton predicted, depending on the dial settings.

5. The "Dark Matter" Mystery and MOND

This is the most exciting part. Astronomers see galaxies spinning so fast that they should fly apart. To explain this, they usually invent "Dark Matter" (invisible stuff holding them together).

However, there is another theory called MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics). It suggests that gravity just changes its behavior at very large distances, so you don't need invisible matter; the rules of gravity are just different out there.

  • The Discovery: The authors found that if they set their Universal Remote's dials to a specific ratio (one dial is 1.5 times the other), the math naturally produces the exact behavior of MOND.
  • The Implication: This suggests that the weird way galaxies spin might not be caused by invisible "dark matter" at all. Instead, it might be because the universe's information storage (entropy) has a specific "texture" that makes gravity act differently on a galactic scale.

Summary

The paper argues that if we view the universe through the lens of this flexible "Universal Remote" for information (Sharma–Mittal entropy):

  1. It respects the fundamental limits of black holes.
  2. It changes how black holes lose mass when they "delete" information.
  3. It naturally explains why galaxies spin the way they do without needing to invent "Dark Matter," by simply adjusting how gravity works at the largest scales.

It's a proposal that the "glue" holding the universe together might be a result of how information is stored and processed, rather than a mysterious invisible substance.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →