Radiological Evaluation of the Natural History of PIK3CA-Related Overgrowth Spectrum (PROS)

This multicenter study of 30 patients provides the first radiological description of the natural history of PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS), demonstrating that tissue malformations typically exhibit sustained progression and volume increase into adulthood.

Fraissenon, A., Morin, G., Boddaert, N., Berteloot, L., Guibaud, L., CANAUD, G.

Published 2026-03-10
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read
⚕️

This is an AI-generated explanation of a preprint that has not been peer-reviewed. It is not medical advice. Do not make health decisions based on this content. Read full disclaimer

Imagine your body is a bustling construction site. Normally, there's a strict foreman (your genes) who tells the workers exactly when to build, how big to build, and when to stop.

PIK3CA-related Overgrowth Spectrum (PROS) happens when a specific instruction manual gets a typo after the construction has already started. This typo causes a specific group of workers to ignore the "stop" signal. Instead of building just the right amount, they keep adding extra bricks, extra pipes, and extra concrete in one specific area. This results in parts of the body growing too large, too fast, or in the wrong shape.

This paper is like a long-term surveillance camera that watched 30 of these construction sites over many years to see what happens if you don't try to fix them with surgery or medicine.

Here is the breakdown of what they found, using simple analogies:

1. The "Untouched" Experiment

The researchers wanted to know: If we leave these overgrowths alone, do they eventually stop growing, or do they keep getting bigger?

To find out, they looked at 30 patients who had confirmed genetic typos. Crucially, they only looked at patients who hadn't had surgery or taken special drugs to shrink the growths between their first and second MRI scans. This was like watching a garden without ever watering it or pulling weeds, just to see how the plants naturally behave.

2. The "Right-Skewed" Growth Curve

The most important discovery is that almost everything kept growing.

  • The Stat: 86.6% of the patients saw their overgrowths get bigger.
  • The Analogy: Imagine a group of 30 people saving money. Most of them added a little bit to their savings every year. But a few people were like lottery winners, adding a massive amount.
    • On average, the "growth" (the size of the overgrowth) increased by about 52%.
    • However, the median (the middle point) was 37.8%.
    • This means while most grew steadily, a few grew explosively (some even doubled or tripled in size).

3. It Doesn't Stop at Puberty

For a long time, doctors wondered: "Do these growths stop getting bigger once the child becomes an adult?"

  • The Finding: No. The growth didn't stop when the patients hit puberty.
  • The Analogy: Think of a balloon that you stop blowing into when you turn 18. You might expect it to stay the same size forever. But in PROS, the balloon keeps slowly inflating even into your 30s, 40s, and beyond. The "engine" driving the growth never really turns off; it just runs at different speeds for different people.

4. The "Lumpy" Nature of the Growth

The overgrowths aren't just one big lump of muscle. They are often a messy mix of different tissues, like a smoothie made of the wrong ingredients.

  • The Mix: Some were mostly veins (like a tangled hose), some were lymph fluid (like a water balloon), and some were fatty tissue (like a soft pillow).
  • The Result: The MRI scans showed that these "smoothies" were often a complex mix of all three. The researchers found that the ones with more veins and fluid tended to grow faster than the ones that were just fat.

5. Why This Matters (The "Baseline" Problem)

Why did the researchers spend years watching these patients without treating them?

  • The Problem: We now have new "magic erasers" (drugs) that can shrink these growths. But to know if the drug works, we need to know how fast the growth would have grown on its own.
  • The Analogy: Imagine you are testing a new car brake. To know if the brake works, you first need to know how fast the car was rolling down the hill before you hit the brakes. If you don't know the natural speed, you can't tell if the brake actually slowed it down or if the car just naturally slowed down because the hill got flatter.
  • The Takeaway: This study provides that "natural speed" data. Now, when a patient takes a new drug, doctors can compare their growth to this "natural history" to see if the drug is truly working.

Summary

This paper tells us that PROS is a progressive condition. It is not a one-time event that happens in childhood and then freezes. It is a slow-burning fire that keeps smoldering and spreading throughout a person's entire life.

  • Good news: We now have a clear map of how these growths behave naturally.
  • Bad news: They rarely stop on their own.
  • Actionable news: Because we know they keep growing, doctors can now be more proactive. They can monitor patients closely and use new medicines earlier to stop the "construction crew" from building too much, rather than waiting until the problem becomes unmanageable.

Get papers like this in your inbox

Personalized daily or weekly digests matching your interests. Gists or technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →