Older adults' beliefs about anxiety: A multicultural qualitative study informed by Leventhal's Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation

This UK qualitative study utilizing Leventhal's Common-Sense Model reveals that older adults' beliefs about anxiety are shaped more by individual salient identities and the distress level of their condition than by broad cultural categories, highlighting the need for nuanced, person-centred approaches to address underdiagnosis and low service utilization.

The Gist

The Big Picture: What Was This Study About?

Imagine you have a group of older adults from different backgrounds living in the UK: some are White British, some are from South Asia (like India or Pakistan), and some are from Africa or the Caribbean. They all have something in common: they worry a lot. Some of them worry so much it hurts their daily life (distressing anxiety), while others worry but feel they can handle it (non-distressing anxiety).

The researchers wanted to know: How do these different people understand and explain their own worry?

They used a famous psychological map called Leventhal's Common-Sense Model. Think of this model like a GPS for illness. When you get sick, your brain automatically tries to answer five questions to navigate your recovery:

1. What is it? (Identity)
2. Why did it happen? (Cause)
3. How long will it last? (Timeline)
4. Can I fix it? (Control/Cure)
5. How bad will it get? (Consequences)

The study found that while everyone uses this "GPS," the map they are looking at is very different depending on who they are and how much their worry is hurting them.

---

Key Findings: The "Two Types of Worriers"

The most surprising discovery wasn't about culture (like being British vs. South Asian); it was about how much the worry was hurting them. The researchers split the group into two camps:

1. The "Distressed" Worriers (The ones in deep pain)

These are people whose anxiety is severe.

• The Analogy: Imagine they are stuck in a foggy valley. They know something is wrong, but they can't see the path out.
• What they believe: They don't think their worry is just "getting old." They know it's not normal. But they also don't think it's a "disease" like a broken leg that a doctor can fix with a cast. They feel stuck in the middle. They often blame their physical health (like Parkinson's or bad knees) or the loss of their independence.
• The Trap: Because they can't label it clearly as "illness" or "normal aging," they feel helpless. They don't seek help because they aren't sure what they are seeking help for.

2. The "Non-Distressed" Worriers (The ones who think they are fine)

These are people who worry, but they feel they are coping.

• The Analogy: Imagine they are walking on a well-paved sidewalk. They see a pothole (worry), but they think, "Oh, that's just part of the road."
• What they believe: They often think anxiety is just a normal part of getting older, or a sign of a "weak personality." Some even think the word "anxiety" is a trendy label people use to get attention or money.
• The Trap: Because they think it's "normal" or "just a personality flaw," they don't think they need a doctor. They try to "tough it out" or pray it away.

---

The Cultural Twist: It's Not Just About "Culture"

You might expect that a South Asian person would have a totally different view than a White British person. But the study found something more interesting: It's about your "Identity," not just your passport.

• The "Religious Shield": For some people with strong religious or cultural identities, their faith acts like a shield. If they are part of a tight-knit church or community, that group protects them from anxiety.
• The "Religious Trap": However, for others, that same faith can feel like a trap. If they are worried, they might think, "If I had enough faith, I wouldn't be worried." This makes them feel guilty and ashamed, so they hide their feelings.
• The Language Barrier: The word "Anxiety" is like a key that fits some locks but not others.
  • In English, "Anxiety" and "Depression" are two different keys.
  • In some other languages, there is only one big key (like "Mental Health" or "Stress") that opens both doors.
  • Some people avoid the word "Anxiety" because it sounds like a medical label that implies they have "lost their faith" or are "shameful." They prefer words like "Pressure," "Thinking too much," or "Having no peace."

---

The "New Map" Dimensions

The researchers found that the original "GPS" (Leventhal's Model) was missing two important features for older adults:

1. The "Aggravating Factors" (The Gas Pedal):
   These aren't the cause of the anxiety, but things that make it worse. For example, a person might be anxious about their health, but the fear of falling down the stairs makes them too scared to leave the house. The fear of the consequence becomes a new problem.

2. The "Protective Factors" (The Seatbelt):
   These are things that stop the anxiety from getting worse. For many, it wasn't a pill; it was belonging. Being part of a community where you feel like a brother or sister, or having a strong faith, acted like a seatbelt that kept them safe during the bumpy ride of life.

---

The Big Lesson: Stop Using "One Size Fits All"

The most important takeaway is this: Don't treat all older adults from a specific culture as a single block.

• The Analogy: Imagine you have a box of apples. You might think, "All red apples taste the same." But if you look closer, some are sweet, some are sour, some are bruised, and some are perfect.
• The Reality: Grouping people just by their ethnicity (e.g., "All South Asians think X") is like assuming all red apples taste the same. It ignores the fact that a person's personal story, their faith, their physical health, and how much pain they are in matters more than their background.

What Should We Do?

The paper suggests that doctors and helpers need to stop asking, "What is your culture?" and start asking, "What is your story?"

Instead of handing out a generic brochure about "Anxiety," they need to listen to how this specific person describes their worry. Is it "pressure"? Is it "lack of peace"? Is it "thinking too much"? Once they speak the person's language, they can help them navigate out of that foggy valley or fix the potholes on their sidewalk.

In short: Anxiety is a universal human experience, but the map we use to navigate it is drawn by our personal lives, not just our passports.

Technical Summary

1. Problem Statement

Anxiety disorders in older adults are significantly underdiagnosed and undertreated, particularly within minority ethnic groups in the UK. Despite high prevalence and negative health outcomes, over 70% of older adults with anxiety do not seek mental health services. Existing research suggests that cultural factors heavily influence illness perceptions and help-seeking behaviors, yet there is a scarcity of qualitative, cross-cultural research exploring how older adults from diverse backgrounds (White British, South Asian, African, and Caribbean) conceptualize anxiety. Furthermore, it is unclear how well existing theoretical frameworks, specifically Leventhal's Common-Sense Model (CSM) of Self-Regulation, apply to anxiety in this specific demographic.

2. Methodology

• Study Design: A multicultural qualitative study utilizing a generic qualitative approach (Ritchie and Spencer) grounded in subtle realism, interpretivism, and pragmatism.
• Participants: 52 older adults (aged 65+) living independently in the UK. The sample included:
  • 16 White British
  • 20 South Asian (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi)
  • 16 African or Caribbean
  • Note: The sample was stratified into two subgroups based on the severity of their experience: 27 with distressing anxiety (significant distress/functional impairment) and 25 with non-distressing anxiety.
• Data Collection:
  • Conducted between April 2021 and May 2022 (during COVID-19 lockdowns).
  • Methods included phone, virtual (Zoom), and in-person interviews.
  • Professional interpreters facilitated interviews for non-English speakers (languages included Urdu, Hindi, Bengali, Wolof, Luganda, Punjabi, Sylheti).
  • Recruitment used purposive and snowball sampling, employing lay terms ("worrier," "stress") alongside medical terms to ensure inclusivity.
• Data Analysis:
  • Framework Method: A comparative thematic analysis using a matrix output (cases vs. themes).
  • Coding Strategy: Deductive coding based on Leventhal's CSM dimensions (Identity, Cause, Timeline, Consequences, Control/Curability, Coherence, Emotional Representation) combined with inductive analysis to identify new themes.
  • Rigor: Analysis was cross-checked by the research team, and public contributors (co-researchers) reviewed extracts and validated interpretations.

3. Key Contributions

• Theoretical Extension: The study validates the applicability of Leventhal's Common-Sense Model to anxiety in older adults but identifies two new dimensions not originally in the model:
  1. Aggravating Factors: Triggers that worsen symptoms (e.g., specific activities like driving or shopping).
  2. Protective Factors: Elements that alleviate or prevent symptoms (e.g., community belonging, faith).
• Identity vs. Culture: The research challenges the notion that "culture" is a monolithic predictor of beliefs. Instead, it demonstrates that salient identities (e.g., religious devotion, caregiver role, specific personal history) are more influential than broad ethnic categorizations in shaping illness beliefs.
• Distress Typology: It introduces a critical distinction between "distressing" and "non-distressing" anxiety, revealing that these groups hold fundamentally different beliefs about the nature, cause, and manageability of anxiety.

4. Key Results

The findings mapped onto Leventhal's CSM dimensions with significant variations:

• Illness Identity (Labels):
  • Participants with distressing anxiety who accessed services were comfortable with Western medical labels ("anxiety," "panic attacks").
  • Those with non-distressing anxiety or those from minority groups often avoided medical labels due to stigma, shame, or the belief that the terms implied a lack of faith. They preferred colloquial terms like "stress," "pressure," or "thinking a lot."
  • In some languages, "anxiety" and "depression" were merged under a single umbrella term for mental distress.
• Perceived Causes:
  • Distressing Group: Attributed anxiety to unmodifiable stressors, cumulative losses (health, independence, loved ones), and physical decline. They viewed anxiety as a justified but uncontrollable response to suffering.
  • Non-Distressing Group: Viewed anxiety as a normal part of aging or a result of "weak" personality traits/lack of faith.
  • Cultural Specifics: South Asian and African/Caribbean participants cited cultural expectations (e.g., family unity, elder care) and discrimination as unique stressors.
• Timeline & Course:
  • Distressing Group: Viewed anxiety as chronic, progressive, or fluctuating.
  • Non-Distressing Group: Viewed anxiety as acute, short-term, and episodic ("comes and goes").
• Control & Curability:
  • Distressing Group: Often felt anxiety was incurable and uncontrollable, leading to feelings of helplessness.
  • Non-Distressing Group: Believed anxiety was easily manageable through simple strategies (avoidance, distraction) or willpower.
• Emotional Representation:
  • Distressing anxiety was associated with shame, helplessness, and a sense of being "weak."
  • Confusion about whether symptoms were "normal" aging or pathology created a "limbo" state, preventing participants from classifying their condition as an illness requiring treatment.

5. Significance and Implications

• Clinical Practice: The study highlights that broad cultural generalizations are insufficient for effective care. Clinicians must assess an individual's salient identities and the severity of their distress rather than relying solely on ethnic background.
• Service Utilization: The ambiguity between "normal" aging stress and "pathological" anxiety, combined with the stigma of medical labels, explains low help-seeking rates. Interventions must address the "illness trajectory" ambiguity.
• Research Methodology: The paper argues against grouping diverse populations into homogeneous cultural categories. Future cross-cultural research must adopt nuanced, person-centered approaches to capture the diversity within groups.
• Theoretical Impact: While Leventhal's CSM is useful, the study suggests it may need adaptation for mental health contexts where the boundary between "self" and "illness" is blurred, and where social suffering is a primary driver of symptoms.

In conclusion, the study provides a nuanced understanding of how older adults from diverse backgrounds perceive anxiety, emphasizing that distress levels and personal identity salience are more predictive of health beliefs than cultural background alone.