Older adults beliefs about coping strategies for anxiety: A UK-based multicultural qualitative study informed by Leventhals Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation

This UK-based qualitative study of 52 older adults from diverse ethnic backgrounds reveals that while self-help strategies are the most common coping mechanism for anxiety, individual salient identities rather than cultural background drive strategy selection, highlighting the need for interventions that empower self-help while addressing barriers to formal care and acknowledging intra-group heterogeneity beyond the limitations of Leventhal's Common-Sense Model.

The Gist

🧠 The Big Picture: A "Toolbox" for Worry

Imagine your mind is a house, and anxiety is like a storm battering the windows. This study asked a simple but important question: How do older adults (65+) in the UK fix their leaky roofs when the storm hits?

The researchers interviewed 52 people from different backgrounds (White British, South Asian, African, and Caribbean). They wanted to know: Do they call a professional roofer (a therapist)? Do they try to fix it themselves with duct tape and hope (self-help)? Or do they just sit inside and wait for the rain to stop?

The study used a famous psychological map called Leventhal's Common-Sense Model. Think of this model as a GPS that assumes: If you feel sick, you look at the map, decide on a route, and drive to the doctor.

The Surprise: The researchers found that for older adults, the "GPS" is broken. Their decisions aren't just about how sick they feel; they are about who they are, their identity, and their personal rules for life.

---

🛠️ The Main Finding: The "DIY First" Rule

The biggest discovery is that almost everyone tries to fix the storm themselves first. They treat self-help as their "first aid kit."

• The Distraction Strategy: "I can't stop thinking about the storm, so I'm going to go walk the dog, watch a funny movie, or garden." It's like putting a bucket under the leak to catch the water so you can relax for a bit.
• The "Inner Strength" Strategy: Many participants said, "I have to be the captain of my own ship." They used positive self-talk ("I am a wise woman," "I am strong") to keep the boat steady.
• The "Group Anchor" Strategy: For many, especially those with strong religious or cultural ties, their community (like a church or a women's group) acted like an anchor. It didn't stop the storm, but it kept them from drifting away.

Key Insight: These strategies weren't just about "culture." A South Asian woman and a White British man might use the exact same strategy if they both valued being "strong" and "independent." It was their personal identity that mattered more than their passport.

---

🚪 The Door to the Doctor: Why It's Hard to Open

Even when the storm gets really bad, many older adults hesitate to call a professional roofer (the NHS or a therapist). Why?

1. The "Strong Person" Mask
Imagine wearing a heavy, invisible mask that says "I am strong; I don't need help."

• For many men in the study, taking anxiety medication felt like admitting, "I am weak."
• For many women, talking about their feelings felt like "complaining" or being a burden to the family.
• The Analogy: It's like refusing to ask for directions because you don't want to look lost. They would rather drive in circles than admit they need a map.

2. The "Crisis Only" Rule
Many participants believed: "You only go to the doctor if you are bleeding or can't walk."

• They saw anxiety as a "soft" problem, not a "real" medical emergency.
• They often waited until they were so depressed or suicidal that they had to go. By then, the storm had already flooded the house.

3. The "Bad Experience" Fear
Some people were scared of the "roofer" (the GP or doctor).

• The "Quick Fix" Fear: They worried doctors would just hand them a pill (like a band-aid) without listening to the story of why the roof is leaking.
• The "Stranger" Fear: Talking to a stranger about your deepest fears felt wrong. "Why tell a stranger my secrets when I can tell my sister or my pastor?"
• The "Discrimination" Fear: Some minority participants felt that doctors wouldn't understand their culture or would treat them with less respect, like they were "less than."

---

💊 The Medicine Cabinet: "Zombie Pills" vs. "Magic Beans"

When it came to medication, the older adults had mixed feelings.

• The Fear: They called pills "zombie makers" or "happy tablets." They were terrified of becoming dependent, feeling groggy, or losing their sharp minds.
• The Reality: Many who took pills did so reluctantly, often cutting the dose in half or taking them only on "bad days" to test the waters. They wanted to feel better, but they didn't want to lose themselves in the process.

---

🗣️ The "Talking Cure": To Talk or Not to Talk?

• The Good: Some loved talking to a counselor. They saw it as "unloading a heavy backpack." They liked that the therapist was a neutral stranger who wouldn't gossip.
• The Bad: Others hated it. They felt it was a waste of time to talk about the past instead of fixing the future. They felt it was unnatural to pour your heart out to someone you don't know.
• The CBT Confusion: Many didn't know what "CBT" (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) was. They thought it was just "talking." One participant joked that CBT might work for a "middle-class white professional" but wouldn't work for someone with a different background or language.

---

🌍 The "Culture" Myth: It's Not About the Passport

The study challenged a common idea: that culture is a rigid box that dictates how you behave.

• The Old Way of Thinking: "South Asians do X, Africans do Y, White people do Z."
• The New Way of Thinking: The researchers found that identity is the real boss.
  • If you are a "strong grandmother," you act like one, whether you are from Manchester, Mumbai, or Kingston.
  • If you are a "devout Christian," your faith guides your coping, regardless of your skin color.
  • The Metaphor: Culture isn't a wall that separates people; it's a color palette. Everyone has the same colors (fear, love, strength), but they paint their own unique picture based on their personal history and values.

---

🏁 The Takeaway: What Should We Do?

The researchers suggest two main things:

1. Don't just tell people to "go to the doctor." Instead, give them better tools to fix the roof themselves. Teach them how to use self-help strategies effectively. Think of it as giving them a high-quality toolkit rather than just a map.
2. Fix the "Doctor's Shop." If older adults feel judged, rushed, or misunderstood by doctors, they won't come back. Doctors need to listen better, understand that "anxiety" is a real illness, and respect the patient's identity and culture.

In short: Older adults are incredibly resourceful and resilient. They are trying to manage their anxiety with the tools they have. The goal isn't to force them to change, but to make the professional help available when they do need it, so it feels like a helpful partner, not a stranger with a clipboard.

Technical Summary

Title

Older adults' beliefs about coping strategies for anxiety: A UK-based multicultural qualitative study informed by Leventhal's Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation.

1. Problem Statement

• Context: Anxiety disorders in older adults are underdiagnosed and undertreated. Older adults, particularly those from minority ethnic backgrounds, are less likely to utilize formal mental health services compared to younger populations.
• Gap in Knowledge: While previous research has explored illness representations (how people perceive anxiety), there is a lack of understanding regarding the beliefs underpinning coping strategies (how people manage anxiety). Furthermore, existing models, such as Leventhal's Common-Sense Model (CSM), may not fully capture the complexity of help-seeking behaviors in diverse, multicultural older populations.
• Objective: To explore and compare the beliefs underpinning coping strategies for anxiety among self-reporting White British, South Asian, and African/Caribbean older adults in the UK, using Leventhal's CSM as a theoretical framework.

2. Methodology

• Study Design: A pragmatic, generic qualitative approach utilizing the Framework Method for data analysis. The study employed a multicultural design to compare perspectives across three distinct cultural groups.
• Participants:
  • Sample Size: 52 older adults (aged 65+).
  • Demographics: 16 White British, 20 South Asian (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi), and 16 African/Caribbean.
  • Subgroups: Participants were categorized into two groups based on symptom severity: 27 with "distressing anxiety" (significant emotional pain/functional impairment) and 25 with "non-distressing anxiety."
  • Recruitment: Purposive and snowball sampling during the UK COVID-19 lockdown (April 2021–May 2022). Recruitment utilized gatekeepers, community organizations, and social media. Terms like "stress" and "worrier" were used alongside "anxiety" to reduce stigma and improve inclusivity.
• Data Collection:
  • Format: Two interviews per participant. The first involved screening (Geriatric Anxiety Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale) and consent; the second was a semi-structured interview (38–160 mins).
  • Languages: 10 interviews were conducted in non-English languages (Urdu, Hindi, Bengali, Wolof, Luganda, Punjabi, Sylheti) with professional interpreters.
  • Tools: A topic guide co-produced with Public Contributors (PPIE) based on Leventhal's CSM, covering self-help, help-seeking, treatment beliefs, and barriers/enablers.
• Analysis:
  • Framework Method: Data were analyzed using a matrix output to compare cases and codes.
  • Theoretical Approach: Deductive analysis based on Leventhal's CSM (illness representations, coping, appraisal) combined with inductive analysis to identify new themes not captured by the model.
  • Validation: Public contributors reviewed data interpretation; data saturation was reached after 45 interviews, with 7 additional interviews conducted for linguistic diversity.

3. Key Contributions

• Theoretical Extension: The study demonstrates that while Leventhal's CSM provides a useful scaffold, it is insufficient to fully explain coping behaviors in this demographic. It identifies critical factors missing from the model, specifically the role of salient identities (personal, role, and social) and higher-order goals (e.g., maintaining a "strong" self-image) in driving or inhibiting help-seeking.
• Cultural Nuance vs. Identity: The research challenges the notion that "culture" acts as a static, homogeneous boundary. Instead, it finds that salient identities (e.g., religious faith, gender roles, professional status) are more predictive of coping strategies than broad cultural categories (White British vs. South Asian).
• Typology of Anxiety: The study introduces a distinction between "distressing" and "non-distressing" anxiety, noting that help-seeking behaviors differ significantly between those who view their anxiety as a manageable trait versus a crisis requiring intervention.

4. Key Results

• Dominance of Self-Help: Across all groups, self-help was the primary coping mechanism. Strategies included:
  • Distraction: Walking, gardening, TV.
  • Somatic Management: Breathing exercises, warm fluids.
  • Identity Affirmation: Leveraging personal strengths, religious faith (prayer), and social group memberships to maintain a positive self-concept.
  • Social Comparison: Downward social comparison (comparing oneself to those worse off) to boost self-esteem.
• Informal Help-Seeking: Participants relied heavily on trusted family and friends. However, stigma and the fear of "burdening" others or being seen as "weak" often prevented disclosure. Religious institutions (Churches, Mosques) served as vital informal support networks, particularly for African/Caribbean and South Asian participants.
• Barriers to Formal Help:
  • Threshold for Help: Formal help was generally sought only when anxiety caused severe functional impairment or was comorbid with depression. Anxiety alone was often not viewed as a legitimate reason for medical intervention.
  • Provider Distrust: GPs were viewed as gatekeepers but often criticized for overprescribing medication, lack of continuity of care, and racial stereotyping.
  • Treatment Beliefs:
    • Medication: Viewed as a "last resort," associated with addiction, "zombie-like" states, and weakness. Many participants self-managed doses or refused meds due to fear of side effects.
    • Psychotherapy: "Talking therapies" were mixed. While some valued the detachment of a stranger, others felt it ignored root causes or was culturally inappropriate (e.g., CBT perceived as unsuitable for non-White, low-literacy populations).
• The Role of Identity: Participants prioritized maintaining a "strong" persona (especially men and matriarchs) over seeking help. Religious identity often facilitated coping through surrender to a higher power, whereas cultural identity influenced the type of social group sought for support.

5. Significance and Implications

• Clinical Practice: Interventions should not solely focus on increasing awareness of anxiety disorders but should empower older adults to utilize their existing self-resources (self-help strategies, social identities) more effectively. Social prescribing (linking patients to community groups) is highlighted as a viable, culturally acceptable adjunct to formal therapy.
• Policy and Service Design: Mental health services must address systemic barriers, including racial discrimination, lack of continuity of care, and the perception of services as "weakness." Services need to be culturally responsive, moving beyond a "one-size-fits-all" approach (e.g., standard CBT) to accommodate diverse cultural and religious worldviews.
• Research Direction: Future cross-cultural research must acknowledge heterogeneity within groups. Researchers should avoid treating cultural groups as monolithic blocks and instead investigate how intersecting identities (religion, gender, age, class) shape health behaviors.
• Model Limitation: The study suggests that Leventhal's CSM needs modification to include "social influences" and "identity goals" to accurately predict help-seeking behavior in older, multicultural populations.

Conclusion: The study concludes that no single model can fully depict the complexity of coping behaviors. Effective support for older adults requires a nuanced approach that validates their self-help strategies, addresses identity-based barriers to help-seeking, and dismantles structural inequities in healthcare delivery.