Uptake and retention in HIV care among pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV under different eras of vertical transmission prevention policies in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 82 studies across 17 sub-Saharan African countries demonstrates that the implementation of Option B+ policies significantly improved both HIV care uptake (by 8%) and retention rates (by 46%) among pregnant and postpartum women, although retention levels remain insufficient to meet UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets.

Original authors: Jinga, N. N., Hwang, C., Rossouw, L., Clouse, K., Nattey, C., Mbwele, B., Ngcobo, N. B., Beestrum, M., Huffman, M. D., Fox, M. P., Maskew, M.

Published 2026-04-08
📖 3 min read☕ Coffee break read
⚕️

This is an AI-generated explanation of a preprint that has not been peer-reviewed. It is not medical advice. Do not make health decisions based on this content. Read full disclaimer

Imagine a massive, bustling train station in Sub-Saharan Africa. The passengers are pregnant women living with HIV, and their destination is "Health and Safety." The goal is to get every single passenger on the right train (starting medication) and keep them on it all the way to the final stop (staying healthy and preventing the virus from passing to their babies).

For a long time, the station had a complicated, changing schedule. Sometimes, you had to wait for a specific ticket office to open; sometimes, the rules changed depending on the day. This was the "Pre-Option B+" era. It was like trying to catch a train where the departure times were confusing, and many people got lost, missed their ride, or got off the train too early.

Then, the station managers introduced a new, streamlined system called "Option B+". Think of this as installing an express lane with a friendly guide who says, "If you are pregnant and need this medicine, just hop on the train immediately. No waiting, no extra paperwork, no questions asked."

This paper is like a giant report card that looks at how well this new system worked between 2010 and 2025. The researchers gathered data from 17 different countries (82 different studies) to see if the new "express lane" actually helped more women get on the train and stay on it.

Here is what they found, translated into everyday terms:

1. Getting on the Train (Uptake)

Before the new system, some women missed the train or didn't know where to go. After the "Option B+" express lane opened, 8% more women successfully boarded the train.

  • The Analogy: Imagine a bus stop where 100 people were waiting. Before the change, maybe 90 got on. After the change, 98 got on. It's a small but important improvement in getting people started.

2. Staying on the Train (Retention)

This is where the real magic happened. Getting on the train is one thing; staying on it for the long journey is another. Many women used to get off the train halfway through because the journey was too hard or the rules were confusing.

  • The Old Days: Before the new policy, only about 37 out of 100 women stayed on the train for the full 6-month journey.
  • The New Days: After the policy changed, that number jumped to 73 out of 100 women staying on the train.
  • The Analogy: This is a 46% improvement. It's like upgrading a bumpy, confusing dirt road into a smooth highway. The journey became so much easier that almost twice as many people decided to stick with it.

The Bottom Line

The report concludes that the new "Option B+" policy was a huge success. It acted like a traffic light turning green, allowing more women to start treatment and keeping them safe on their journey.

However, there is still work to do.
Even though the numbers improved dramatically, the goal is to have 95 out of 100 women staying on the train and healthy. Right now, we are at about 73. It's like a marathon runner who has run a great race but hasn't quite crossed the finish line yet. The new system is working, but we need to keep fixing the bumps in the road so that every single woman can reach the finish line safely.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →