Sensor placement causes outcome-dependent bias in ambulatory light-exposure estimates
This study demonstrates that while chest-mounted light dosimeters can provide sufficiently accurate aggregated timing and duration metrics for scalable studies, both chest and wrist placements significantly underestimate eye-level light exposure—particularly at night and for temporal dynamics—with wrist placement introducing the greatest and most unpredictable bias, thereby necessitating near-eye measurement for precise, small-sample, or time-resolved analyses.