Non-onsite symmetry breaking: topological phase coexistence and criticality

This paper investigates the spontaneous symmetry breaking of non-onsite symmetries in one and two spatial dimensions, revealing novel phases characterized by the coexistence of distinct symmetry-protected topological orders, long-range entanglement, and topological quantum criticality.

Original authors: Zhehao Zhang, Yabo Li, Tsung-Cheng Lu

Published 2026-05-28
📖 6 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Zhehao Zhang, Yabo Li, Tsung-Cheng Lu

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The Big Idea: Breaking Rules to Make New Worlds

Imagine you are organizing a massive dance party. Usually, the rules of the dance are simple: everyone spins in place (an "onsite" rule). If everyone breaks this rule at the same time, the party changes from a chaotic mess into an orderly line dance. This is what physicists call Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB). It's how materials decide to become magnets or superconductors.

But in this paper, the authors ask a weird question: What happens if the rule itself is weird?

Instead of telling everyone to spin in place, imagine the rule is: "If you and your neighbor are holding hands, you must swap places." This rule involves two people at once; it's not just about one person. The authors call this a "non-onsite" symmetry. They wanted to see what kind of "dance" (state of matter) emerges when this weird, two-person rule is broken.

Part 1: The One-Dimensional Party (The 1D Chain)

The Setup:
Imagine a single line of people holding hands. The "weird rule" is that if you look at the whole line, the pattern of who is holding hands with whom flips.

The Discovery:
Usually, when a symmetry breaks, you get one specific outcome (like everyone facing North). But here, the authors found something magical: The ground state (the most comfortable resting position) is a superposition of two completely different worlds.

  • World A: Everyone is just standing still in a simple line (a "trivial" state).
  • World B: Everyone is holding hands in a complex, knotted pattern (a "cluster state" or SPT order).

The Analogy:
Imagine a coin that, when it lands, doesn't just show Heads or Tails. Instead, it lands in a state where it is both a perfectly smooth coin (World A) and a coin with a complex, knotted string wrapped around it (World B) at the same time.

The paper proves that:

  1. They coexist: The system doesn't have to choose one or the other; it lives in a superposition of both.
  2. It's stable: Even if you wiggle the system slightly (add a small perturbation), this weird "both/and" state stays stable up to a certain point.
  3. The Critical Point: If you wiggle it too hard, the system snaps. It loses its "both/and" nature and becomes a "critical" phase. Think of this like a bridge that is perfectly balanced between two cliffs. If you push it too far, it falls into a river of pure chaos (a gapless phase described by a Conformal Field Theory), where things are constantly fluctuating and never settle down.

The "Charge" Problem:
In normal physics, if you break a rule, you can find a "charged" object that proves it (like a magnet pole). But because this rule is so weird (non-onsite), the "charged object" needed to prove the breakage cannot be a normal, reversible object. It's like trying to use a key that only works one way and then disappears. The authors found a specific "non-invertible" operator that acts as this proof, showing that the system has long-range connections that can't be explained by simple local rules.

Part 2: The Two-Dimensional Party (The 2D Grid)

The Setup:
Now imagine the dancers are on a honeycomb grid (like a beehive). The rule is even stranger: "If you form a closed loop with your neighbors, you must swap places."

The Discovery:
When this rule breaks, the system doesn't just pick one pattern. It creates a "Soup."

The Analogy:
Imagine a pot of soup where the ingredients are loops of 1D "knotted" strings.

  • In a normal soup, you have random noodles.
  • In this "SPT Soup," the noodles are actually tiny, knotted 1D quantum states (SPTs).
  • These knotted loops are floating everywhere, overlapping and condensing.

The Result:
On a torus (a donut shape), there are four different versions of this soup that look exactly the same if you only look at a small spoonful (local view). You can't tell them apart unless you look at the whole donut.

  • The Critical Twist: Unlike normal topological order (like the Toric Code) which is rigid and has a gap (a "hard" energy cost to change), this soup is critical. The connections between the loops decay slowly (algebraically), like a signal fading over a long distance rather than vanishing instantly. It's a "liquid" topological state that is constantly fluctuating, sitting right on the edge of a phase transition.

Part 3: How to Make It (The Recipe)

The authors also figured out how to cook this up in a lab using quantum computers.

The Protocol:

  1. Start: Put all qubits (quantum bits) in a simple state.
  2. Measure: Perform measurements on some parts of the system.
  3. Feedback: Based on the measurement results, apply a quick "correction" (a unitary gate).
  4. Result: With a 50% chance, you end up with the perfect "Superposition of Trivial and Knotted" state.

The Catch:
While they can make the 1D version reliably, making the 2D "SPT Soup" is much harder. It's like trying to untangle a knot in a ball of yarn by only looking at a tiny section of it. The "defects" (mistakes in the pattern) in this 2D soup are stubborn; they can't be easily fixed with a simple, quick move, making the 2D version harder to prepare perfectly.

Summary of the "New Physics"

  • Non-Onsite Symmetries: These are rules that involve groups of neighbors, not just individuals.
  • Coexistence: Breaking these rules creates a state that is simultaneously "simple" and "complex" (trivial and topological).
  • Criticality: This state is fragile. Push it too hard, and it turns into a critical, fluctuating phase (CFT) rather than a solid, stable phase.
  • SPT Soup: In 2D, breaking these rules creates a "condensate" of 1D knots, resulting in a state with long-range algebraic correlations (power-law decay) rather than short-range order.

In short, the paper discovers a new class of quantum matter where the "rules of the game" are so interconnected that breaking them creates a hybrid world of order and chaos, existing in a delicate, critical balance.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →