← Latest papers
⚛️ nuclear experiments

Deformation from zinc to zirconium

This paper presents extensive gamma-ray spectroscopy of neutron-rich nuclei between Ni and Sn using the MINOS target system, revealing persistent deformation beyond N=60, erosion of the N=50 shell closure near 78Ni, and providing a theoretical analysis of collective effects in Ge isotopes via the projected generator coordinate method.

Original authors: Sidong Chen, Frank Browne, Tomás R. Rodríguez, Volker Werner

Published 2026-09-23
📖 8 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Sidong Chen, Frank Browne, Tomás R. Rodríguez, Volker Werner

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Atoms are the fundamental building blocks of the visible universe, but their interiors are far from simple spheres. At the heart of every atom lies a nucleus, a dense cluster of protons and neutrons held together by powerful forces. For decades, physicists have mapped out how these particles arrange themselves, discovering that certain numbers of protons or neutrons create particularly stable, spherical configurations, much like a perfectly round ball. These special numbers act as "magic numbers," creating a shell structure that resists change. However, as scientists look further out into the chart of elements, toward nuclei that are heavy and packed with extra neutrons, this perfect roundness often breaks down. In these exotic regions, the nucleus can stretch, squash, or twist into elongated or flattened shapes, behaving more like a rugby ball or a pancake than a sphere. Understanding exactly when and why this happens is crucial because it reveals the fundamental rules that govern how matter is assembled in the universe, from the stars that forge these elements to the very stability of the matter around us.

A team of researchers has now taken a closer look at a specific, complex region of this atomic landscape, situated between the elements zinc and zirconium. By firing beams of unstable, neutron-rich atoms at a target and watching how they break apart and emit light, they have captured a detailed picture of how atomic nuclei change their shape as they gain more neutrons. Their work confirms that the transition from a round, rigid shape to a stretched, deformed one does not stop abruptly at a specific point, but rather persists and evolves in surprising ways. They found that while some nuclei hold onto their spherical nature due to strong internal stability, others immediately begin to deform, and in some cases, the nucleus can exist in multiple shapes at once, or twist into a three-dimensional form that is neither a simple sphere nor a flat disk.

The study focused on a chain of isotopes, which are versions of the same element that differ only in the number of neutrons they contain. The researchers began their journey at zinc, an element with 30 protons, and moved step-by-step toward zirconium, which has 40 protons. They were particularly interested in what happens just beyond the point where the nucleus has 50 neutrons, a number that usually acts as a strong barrier, keeping the nucleus spherical and stable. In the case of zinc, the data showed that once the nucleus crosses this 50-neutron threshold, it does not stay round. Instead, it immediately begins to stretch and deform, suggesting that the stabilizing effect of the magic number is very local and does not extend far into the next set of elements. This was a significant finding because it helped clarify why the element nickel-78, which sits nearby, behaves in such a complex way, hinting that the rules of nuclear stability are more fragile than previously thought.

As the team moved to the next elements, germanium and selenium, the story became even more intricate. They discovered that these nuclei do not just stretch in one direction; they often twist into a shape that is tilted, known as triaxial. Imagine a ball that is not just squashed at the poles but is also twisted so that it has no single axis of symmetry; this is the kind of shape the researchers found emerging in these elements. Their observations showed that the energy levels of the nuclei, which act like a fingerprint of their shape, matched predictions for these twisted structures. This suggests that the nuclei in this region are not settling into a single, simple form but are exploring a variety of complex geometries, mixing different shapes together in a way that was difficult to predict before.

The investigation continued further up the chain to krypton and finally to zirconium, where the nuclei are packed with even more neutrons. Here, the researchers looked for a specific point where the nucleus might suddenly become stable again, perhaps due to a new kind of internal order at 70 neutrons. While some theories suggested that the nucleus of zirconium-110 might snap back into a spherical shape, the experimental evidence pointed in a different direction. The data showed that the nucleus remained deformed, behaving like a spinning top rather than a stationary ball. This confirmed that the drive toward deformation is a powerful force in this region, overwhelming any potential stabilizing effects that might have been expected from the neutron count alone. The results also highlighted the existence of "shape isomers," where a nucleus can get stuck in a temporary, different shape before settling down, adding another layer of complexity to how these tiny objects behave.

To make sense of these observations, the researchers relied on sophisticated computer models that simulate the behavior of protons and neutrons from first principles. These models allowed them to visualize the energy landscapes of the nuclei, showing where the most stable shapes lie and how the nucleus might move between them. The simulations confirmed that the nuclei in this region are indeed capable of coexisting in multiple shapes, such as being both elongated and flattened at the same time, or transitioning smoothly between them. The agreement between the real-world measurements and these theoretical calculations gave the team confidence that they were seeing the true nature of these exotic atoms. They found that the models successfully reproduced the specific energy patterns observed in the experiments, validating the idea that these nuclei are governed by a delicate balance of forces that allow for such rich and varied shapes.

The experiments were conducted using a specialized setup at a major research facility, where beams of unstable atoms were smashed into a liquid hydrogen target. This technique allowed the scientists to create and study nuclei that exist for only a fraction of a second before decaying. By detecting the gamma rays, a form of high-energy light, emitted as these nuclei settled into lower energy states, the team could reconstruct the internal structure of the atoms. The precision of these measurements was critical, as the differences between a spherical nucleus and a deformed one often show up as very subtle shifts in the energy of the emitted light. The researchers also used advanced detectors to track the paths of particles knocked out of the target, ensuring that they were studying the correct isotopes and could distinguish between different types of nuclear behavior.

One of the most striking aspects of the findings is the persistence of deformation. The data showed that once the nuclei in this region start to stretch, they do not easily return to a spherical shape, even as they gain more neutrons. This challenges older ideas that suggested the nucleus might stabilize again at certain points. Instead, the evidence points to a continuous evolution where the nuclei become increasingly collective, meaning the protons and neutrons move together in a coordinated way to create these large-scale shapes. This collective behavior is what gives rise to the complex structures observed, from the twisted triaxial forms to the coexistence of different shapes within the same atom.

The study also shed light on the specific role of the number of neutrons in driving these changes. In the zinc isotopes, the transition from a spherical to a deformed shape happened almost immediately after crossing the magic number of 50 neutrons. In contrast, for the heavier elements like zirconium, the deformation was already well-established, and the nucleus maintained this shape even at neutron numbers where some theories predicted a return to stability. This suggests that the forces holding the nucleus together are highly sensitive to the specific combination of protons and neutrons, and that the "magic numbers" that usually provide stability are not as rigid as once believed in these extreme environments.

Looking ahead, the researchers emphasize the need for even more precise measurements to fully understand the lifetimes of these excited states and the probabilities of the transitions between them. They propose that future experiments using higher-resolution detectors could provide a clearer picture of the internal dynamics, potentially revealing even more subtle details about how these nuclei twist and turn. The ability to study these fleeting, exotic atoms is a testament to the advancements in experimental technology, allowing scientists to probe the very limits of nuclear stability. By mapping out the shapes of these nuclei, the team has provided a crucial piece of the puzzle in understanding how the universe builds its matter, from the stable elements we know to the fleeting, deformed forms that exist only in the most extreme conditions.

In the end, this work paints a picture of the atomic nucleus not as a static, rigid object, but as a dynamic, fluid entity that can stretch, twist, and reshape itself in response to the delicate balance of forces within. The journey from zinc to zirconium reveals a landscape of constant change, where the rules of stability are flexible and the shapes of matter are far more diverse than previously imagined. The persistence of deformation across this region suggests that the universe is capable of sustaining these complex structures even in the face of strong stabilizing forces, offering a new perspective on the fundamental nature of matter.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →