← Latest papers
🔭 astrophysics

High-redshift transverse BAO measurements with the SDSS quasar catalog

This study analyzes the SDSS-DR16 quasar catalog to detect transverse BAO signals in two high-redshift shells (1.5z2.01.5 \leq z \leq 2.0), providing new angular diameter distance measurements that bridge an observational gap and yield cosmological parameters consistent with Planck and DESI constraints.

Original authors: Felipe Avila, Armando Bernui, Miguel A. Sabogal, Rafael C. Nunes

Published 2026-08-03
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Felipe Avila, Armando Bernui, Miguel A. Sabogal, Rafael C. Nunes

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the universe as a giant, expanding balloon being blown up by an invisible force. If you were to paint a pattern of dots on that balloon before it started inflating, those dots would drift apart as the balloon grew. But here's the twist: those dots wouldn't just drift randomly. Because of how the universe worked in its very first moments, the dots would have a "favorite" distance between them, like a cosmic ruler stamped into the fabric of space itself. This favorite distance is called the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO). Think of it as the echo of a giant sound wave from the Big Bang that froze in place, leaving a specific spacing between galaxies that we can still measure today.

Why do we care about this cosmic ruler? Because it helps us measure how fast the universe is stretching. If we know how big the ruler should be, and we measure how big it looks to us from Earth, we can figure out how much the universe has expanded since that light left the galaxies. This is crucial because there's a mysterious force called dark energy that is pushing the universe apart, and scientists are trying to understand if this force is constant or if it's changing over time. To do this, they need to measure the universe at different times in its history, like checking the speedometer of a car at different points on a long road trip.


Now, let's zoom in on a new road trip report from a team of astronomers who decided to look at a very specific, tricky part of that journey: the "high-redshift" zone. In astronomy, "redshift" is like a time machine; the higher the number, the further back in time we are looking. While we have good maps for the "nearby" universe and some for the very distant past, there was a huge, foggy gap in the middle, specifically between redshifts of 1.5 and 2.0. It was like trying to drive from New York to Los Angeles but having no map for the entire state of Colorado.

The team, led by Felipe Avila and colleagues, decided to fill in that gap using a massive catalog of quasars. Quasars are like the universe's brightest lighthouses—super-bright cores of distant galaxies powered by black holes. The problem is, they are rare and scattered, making them hard to use for precise measurements. It's a bit like trying to measure the distance between cities by counting how many lighthouses you see in a specific patch of sky; if the lighthouses are too far apart, your measurement gets "fuzzy."

To solve this, the researchers used a clever trick called tomography. Imagine slicing a loaf of bread into incredibly thin slices. Instead of looking at the whole loaf (which would blur the details), they sliced the universe into 50 very thin, separate layers of time, each representing a tiny slice of the redshift interval. By looking at these thin slices one by one, they could sharpen the image and stop the "fuzziness" caused by looking at things that are slightly in front of or behind each other.

They scanned these 50 slices looking for that cosmic ruler pattern. After crunching the numbers with a sophisticated statistical toolkit, they found the pattern! They spotted the acoustic peak—the signature of that frozen sound wave—in two specific, unconnected slices of time: one centered at a redshift of 1.725 and another at 1.775.

The results were statistically significant, meaning the odds of this being a random fluke were very low. For the slice at 1.725, they found the pattern with a confidence of 3.4 sigma (which is like saying, "We are 99.9% sure this is real"). For the slice at 1.775, the confidence was 3.0 sigma. They measured the angle of this pattern to be 1.911° ± 0.062° and 1.727° ± 0.081° respectively.

Using these measurements, they calculated the size of the universe at those times. They found that the angular diameter distance (a way of measuring how big things look) was 11.00 ± 0.36 times the sound horizon scale at the first redshift, and 11.96 ± 0.56 times that scale at the second.

When the team plugged these new, high-redshift data points into the existing maps of the universe, they found that everything fit together beautifully. Their new measurements bridged the gap perfectly and agreed with the predictions from other major studies, like those from the Planck satellite and the DESI collaboration. They didn't find any weird contradictions or evidence that the rules of the universe are breaking down in this time period. Instead, their work confirms that the standard model of cosmology (the flat-ΛCDM model) holds up even in this unexplored territory.

In short, these astronomers successfully used a thin-slice technique to find the cosmic ruler in a part of the universe that was previously too foggy to see. They didn't just find a needle in a haystack; they found two needles in two different haystacks, proving that the cosmic map is consistent and reliable all the way back to when the universe was much younger. This success suggests that using quasars as cosmic tracers is a powerful tool for future studies, especially if we want to understand if the mysterious dark energy is changing its mind as the universe expands.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →