From Quantum Relative Entropy to the Semiclassical Einstein Equations

This paper demonstrates that the semiclassical Einstein equations naturally emerge from the proportionality between quantum relative entropy and horizon area variations, thereby generalizing Jacobson's thermodynamic derivation by replacing classical entropy with well-defined quantum information measures.

Philipp Dorau, Albert Much

Published 2026-03-04
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Imagine you are standing in a vast, empty room. This room represents the vacuum of space—nothing but "empty" space. Now, imagine you throw a single pebble into this room. The air ripples, the light bends, and the room feels different.

For decades, physicists have known that matter (the pebble) and gravity (the bending of the room) are deeply connected. Einstein's famous equations describe exactly how matter tells space how to curve, and how space tells matter how to move. But why does this connection exist? Is it just a fundamental rule of the universe, or is there a deeper reason?

In this paper, two physicists from Leipzig, Germany, propose a fascinating answer: Gravity is actually a form of information processing.

Here is the story of their discovery, broken down into simple concepts.

1. The "Thermodynamics" of Space

In the 1990s, a physicist named Ted Jacobson had a brilliant idea. He suggested that Einstein's equations aren't just about geometry; they are about thermodynamics (the science of heat and energy).

He imagined a tiny, invisible wall in space (called a "Rindler horizon"). If you shine heat (energy) at this wall, the wall's "entropy" (a measure of disorder or information) changes. Jacobson showed that if you assume the area of this wall changes in a specific way when heat hits it, you can mathematically derive Einstein's equations.

The Problem: Jacobson's argument relied on "classical" thermodynamics. But space isn't just a smooth sheet; it's made of quantum particles. In the quantum world, the usual way we measure "disorder" (called von Neumann entropy) breaks down and gives infinite, nonsensical numbers.

2. The New Tool: "Relative Entropy"

The authors of this paper say, "Let's fix this by using a better tool."

Instead of measuring the total disorder of the room, they measure the difference between two states.

  • State A: The empty room (the vacuum).
  • State B: The room with the pebble thrown in (a "coherent excitation").

In the language of quantum information, this difference is called Relative Entropy. Think of it like a "distinguishability score."

  • If the room is empty and you look at it, it looks exactly like the empty room. The score is zero.
  • If you throw a pebble in, the room looks different. The score goes up.

The authors prove that in the quantum world, this "distinguishability score" is perfectly well-defined and finite, even where other methods fail.

3. The Magic Connection: Information = Energy

Here is the core magic of their paper. They used advanced math (called "Modular Theory") to look at what happens at the edge of this local "room" (the horizon).

They discovered a direct link:

The "distinguishability score" (Relative Entropy) is exactly equal to the amount of energy flowing across the horizon.

Imagine you are watching a river.

  • Old View: You see water flowing (Energy).
  • New View: The authors say the amount of water flowing is actually a measure of how much the "information" of the river has changed compared to a calm, still river.

If you add energy (throw a pebble), the "information difference" between the calm river and the rippling river increases. The math shows these two things are two sides of the same coin.

4. From Information to Gravity

Now, they bring in the famous Bekenstein-Hawking idea: The entropy of a black hole (or a horizon) is proportional to its surface area.

So, the chain of logic becomes:

  1. Energy flows across the horizon.
  2. This energy is mathematically identical to a change in Relative Entropy (Information).
  3. If we assume that Information is proportional to Area (just like in black hole physics), then:
    • Energy Flow \rightarrow Change in Area.

When you translate "Change in Area" back into the language of geometry, you get Einstein's Equations.

The Big Picture: Why This Matters

This paper suggests that gravity isn't a fundamental force like magnetism. Instead, it is an emergent phenomenon, much like temperature.

  • Temperature isn't a property of a single atom; it's a statistical result of how trillions of atoms move.
  • Gravity might not be a fundamental property of space; it might be the result of how quantum information changes when matter is present.

The Analogy:
Imagine a crowd of people in a stadium.

  • If everyone is standing still, the "information" of the crowd is low.
  • If a wave starts (people standing up and sitting down), the "information" changes.
  • The authors are saying that the "wave" (gravity) is just the stadium's way of reacting to the change in information caused by the people moving.

Conclusion

The authors have taken a complex thermodynamic argument and upgraded it with modern quantum information theory. They showed that if you look at space through the lens of quantum information (specifically, how distinguishable an excited state is from the vacuum), the laws of gravity fall out naturally.

It suggests that at the deepest level of reality, space, time, and gravity are woven together by the fabric of information.