Beam-test evaluation of pre-production Low Gain Avalanche Detectors for the ATLAS High Granularity Timing Detector

This paper presents beam-test results demonstrating that pre-production Low Gain Avalanche Detectors for the ATLAS High Granularity Timing Detector meet all performance requirements, including charge collection, time resolution, and hit efficiency, even after neutron irradiation simulating end-of-life High Luminosity-LHC conditions.

Original authors: A. Aboulhorma, M. Ait Tamlihat, H. M. Alfanda, O. Atanova, N. Atanov, I. Azzouzi, J. Barreiro Guimarães da Costa, T. Beau, D. Benchekroun, F. Bendebba, G. Bergamin, Y. Bimgdi, A. Blot, A. Boikov, J. B
Published 2026-02-02
📖 4 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: A. Aboulhorma, M. Ait Tamlihat, H. M. Alfanda, O. Atanova, N. Atanov, I. Azzouzi, J. Barreiro Guimarães da Costa, T. Beau, D. Benchekroun, F. Bendebba, G. Bergamin, Y. Bimgdi, A. Blot, A. Boikov, J. Bonis, D. Boumediene, C. Brito, A. S. Brogna, A. M. Burger, L. Cadamuro, Y. Cai, N. Cartalade, R. Casanova Mohr, R. Cherkaoui El Moursli, Y. Che, X. Chen, E. Y. S. Chow, L. D. Corpe, C. G. Crozatier, L. D'Eramo, S. Dahbi, D. Dannheim, G. Daubard, Y. Davydov, J. Debevc, Y. Degerli, E. Delagnes, F. Deliot, M. Dhellot, P. Dinaucourt, G. Di Gregorio, P. J. Dos Santos De Assis, C. Duan, O. Duarte, F. Dulucq, J. Ehrecke, Y. El Ghazali, A. El Moussaouy, A. Falou, L. Fan, Y. Fan, Z. Fan, K. Farman, F. Fassi, Y. Feng, M. Ferreira, F. Filthaut, F. Fischer, P. Fusté, J. Fu, J. García Rodriquez, G. Gaspar De Andrade, V. Gautam, Z. Ge, R. Gonçalo, M. Gouighri, S. Grinstein, K. Gritsay, F. Guilloux, S. Guindon, A. Haddad, S. E. D. Hammoud, L. Han, A. M. Henriques Correia, M. Hidaoui, B. Hiti, J. Hofner, S. Hou, P. J. Hsu, X. Huang, Y. Huang, K. Hu, C. Insa, J. Jeglot, X. Jia, G. Kramberger, M. Kuriyama, B. Y. Ky, D. Lacour, A. Lafarge, B. Lakssir, A. Lantheaume, D. Laporte, C. de La Taille, M. A. L. Leite, A. Leopold, H. Li, L. Li, M. Li, S. Li, S. Li, Y. Li, Z. Li, S. Liang, Z. Liang, B. Liu, K. Liu, K. Liu, Y. L. Liu, Y. W. Liu, F. L. Lucio Alves, M. Lu, Y. J. Lu, F. Lyu, D. Macina, R. Madar, N. Makovec, S. Malyukov, I. Mandić, T. Manoussos, S. Manzoni, G. Martin-Chassard, F. Martins, L. Masetti, R. Mazini, E. Mazzeo, K. Ma, X. Ma, R. Menegasso, J-P. Meyer, Y. Miao, A. Migayron, M. Mihovilovic, M. Milovanovic, M. Missio, V. Moskalenko, N. Mouadili, A. Moussa, I. Nikolic-Audit, C. C. Ohm, H. Okawa, S. Okkerman, M. Ouchrif, C. Pénélaud, A. Parreira, B. Pascual Dias, R. E. de Paula, J. Pinol Bel, P. -O. Puhl, C. Puigdengoles Olive, M. Puklavec, J. Qin, M. Qi, H. Ren, H. Riani, S. Ridouani, V. Rogozin, L. Royer, F. Rudnyckyj, E. F. Saad, G. T. Saito, A. Salem, H. Santos, S. Scarfi, Ph. Schwemling, N. Seguin-Moreau, L. Serin, R. P. Serrano Fernandez, A. Shaikovskii, Q. Sha, L. Shan, R. Shen, X. Shi, P. Skomina, H. Smitmanns, H. L. Snoek, A. P. Soulier, A. Stein, H. Stenzel, J. Strandberg, W. Sun, X. Sun, Y. Sun, Y. Tan, K. Tariq, Y. Tayalati, S. Terzo, A. Torrento Coello, S. Trincaz-Duvoid, U. M. Vande Voorde, I. Velkovska, R. P. Vieira, L. A. Vieira Lopes, A. Visibile, A. Wang, C. Wang, S. M. Wang, T. Wang, T. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Wan, Q. Weitzel, J. Wu, M. Wu, W. Wu, Y. Wu, L. Xia, D. Xu, H. Xu, L. Xu, Z. Yan, H. Yang, H. Yang, X. Yang, X. Yang, J. Ye, I. Youbi, J. Yuan, I. Zahir, H. Zeng, D. Zhang, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, Z. Zhang, M. Zhao, Z. Zhao, X. Zheng, Z. Zhou, Y. Zhu, X. Zhuang

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) as the world's most energetic particle accelerator, smashing protons together to recreate conditions just after the Big Bang. As scientists upgrade this machine to the "High Luminosity" phase, they are essentially turning up the volume on the noise. Instead of a few particles passing through at a time, they will be bombarding the detectors with a blizzard of collisions happening all at once. This "pile-up" makes it incredibly hard to tell which particle came from which collision.

To solve this, the ATLAS experiment is building a new, ultra-fast camera called the High Granularity Timing Detector (HGTD). Think of this detector not just as a camera that takes pictures, but as a high-speed video camera that can freeze time so precisely it can distinguish between two events happening a billionth of a second apart.

The heart of this new camera is a special type of silicon sensor called a Low Gain Avalanche Detector (LGAD). You can think of an LGAD as a "smart microphone" for particles. When a particle hits it, the sensor doesn't just hear a whisper; it amplifies the signal so it can be heard clearly, even in a noisy room.

The Stress Test: Simulating a Harsh Environment

The paper describes a rigorous "stress test" these sensors underwent before being approved for the final camera. The environment inside the LHC is brutal; it's like a nuclear reactor where sensors are constantly bombarded by radiation. Over time, this radiation damages the sensors, much like how constant sunlight fades a painting or rust eats away at metal.

To prepare for this, scientists took pre-production sensors and subjected them to a "radiation bath" at a nuclear reactor in Slovenia. They blasted them with neutrons until they had absorbed as much radiation as they would see over the entire lifetime of the upgraded LHC (up to 2.5 × 10¹⁵ neutrons per square centimeter). It's like taking a new car, driving it through a sandstorm for a million miles, and then checking if the engine still runs.

The Results: Do They Still Work?

The team tested these "beaten-up" sensors at two major particle physics labs (CERN in Switzerland and DESY in Germany) using high-speed particle beams. They looked at three main things:

  1. The Signal (Charge Collection):

    • The Goal: The sensor needs to catch enough "electric charge" from a passing particle to be useful.
    • The Result: Even after being blasted with maximum radiation, the sensors still collected enough charge to work. Interestingly, the paper found that if the particle hits the sensor at a slight angle (like a raindrop hitting a windshield rather than falling straight down), the sensor actually collects more charge. This is because the particle travels a longer path through the sensor, leaving a bigger trail of energy.
  2. The Speed (Time Resolution):

    • The Goal: The sensor needs to time the arrival of a particle with extreme precision (better than 50 picoseconds, which is 50 trillionths of a second).
    • The Result: The sensors passed this test with flying colors. Even the most damaged sensors could time events with the required precision, provided they were given a little extra electrical "push" (voltage) to overcome the radiation damage.
  3. The Reliability (Efficiency):

    • The Goal: The sensor needs to detect almost every particle that passes through it (at least 95% of the time).
    • The Result: The sensors were incredibly reliable. They detected particles with over 99% efficiency when new, and still maintained over 95% efficiency even after the heavy radiation damage. The tests showed that the sensors work uniformly across their entire surface, meaning no "dead spots" appeared after the stress test.

The Verdict

The paper concludes that these specific sensors, made by two different teams (IHEP and USTC in China), are ready for the job. They proved they can survive the harsh, radiation-filled environment of the future LHC while still acting as ultra-fast, precise timers.

In short, the scientists built a prototype "smart microphone," threw it into a hurricane of radiation, and found that it still hears every whisper perfectly. This gives them the confidence to install millions of these sensors into the ATLAS detector, ensuring they can untangle the complex web of particle collisions in the future.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →