Neutrino Masses with Enhanced B−L Symmetry
Original authors: Xiyuan Gao, Amir N. Khan
Original authors: Xiyuan Gao, Amir N. Khan
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Technical Summary: Neutrino Masses with Enhanced B−L Symmetry
Problem Statement
The origin of neutrino masses remains an open question in particle physics. While neutrino oscillations confirm that neutrinos are massive, they are seven to thirteen orders of magnitude lighter than charged fermions. Standard explanations often invoke the seesaw mechanism, which typically breaks the U(1)B−L (baryon minus lepton number) symmetry, allowing for Majorana masses but violating lepton number. Alternatively, if neutrinos are Dirac fermions, U(1)B−L can be an exact symmetry. However, gauging this symmetry usually implies a "fifth force" that has not been observed, suggesting the associated gauge coupling must be extremely weak. Furthermore, conventional models assume the B−L charges of right-handed neutrinos (νR) are identical to those of left-handed lepton doublets (ℓL) to permit Dirac mass terms. This paper investigates whether relaxing the charge quantization condition and the equality of νR and ℓL charges can allow for a scenario where the B−L interaction is strong for neutrinos but remains negligible for baryons and charged leptons, thereby evading current fifth-force constraints.
Methodology
The authors assume all three active neutrinos are Dirac fermions, preserving the exact symmetry SU(3)c×U(1)QED×U(1)B−L. They analyze the anomaly cancellation conditions for the B−L gauge group. The standard anomaly-free conditions for the three generations of νR are:
- ∑QνR=−3
- ∑QνR3=−3
Conventionally, the solution QνR=−1 for all generations is chosen. The authors explore the solution space where B−L charges are not necessarily quantized to integers. They identify a novel class of solutions where the charge of one generation (e.g., νeR) approaches $-3$, while the charges of the other two generations (νμR,ντR) become arbitrarily large and opposite in sign. Specifically, they introduce a parameter ϵ such that as ϵ→0, the charges scale as:
QνμR≈+ϵ1,QντR≈−ϵ1
while QνeR≈−3.
This setup is promoted to a local gauge symmetry. The authors argue that the large charge factor (1/ϵ) does not violate perturbative unitarity if one defines an effective coupling gνeff≡ϵ−1gB−L. They associate the breaking of this symmetry with a sub-eV scale neutrino condensate induced by non-perturbative gravitational effects, rather than a fundamental Higgs field. This generates effective Dirac mass terms without explicit chiral symmetry breaking at the Lagrangian level.
Key Contributions and Results
- Enhanced B−L Symmetry Regime: The paper establishes a previously unexplored regime where two generations of right-handed neutrinos carry arbitrarily enhanced B−L charges, while quarks and charged leptons retain their canonical charges. This results in a gauge interaction that is potentially strong (O(1)) for neutrinos but extremely feeble for baryons, effectively decoupling neutrino-specific constraints from standard fifth-force tests.
- Mass Generation Mechanism: The authors propose that neutrino masses arise from a gravity-induced condensate ⟨νLνR⟩, analogous to the QCD condensate. This mechanism naturally explains the smallness of neutrino masses via a sub-eV symmetry breaking scale and allows for time-varying masses, consistent with cosmological bounds.
- Phenomenological Constraints:
- Neutrino Decay: The primary constraint arises from the decay νi→νjA′, where A′ is the B−L gauge boson. If A′ is lighter than the heaviest neutrino, this decay channel provides a robust bound on the enhanced coupling ϵ−1gB−L. The decay width is calculated, showing that for mA′≪mν, the decay is dominated by the longitudinal mode of A′.
- Scattering Processes: The A′ boson can mediate neutrino-electron (ν−e) elastic scattering and Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering (CEνNS) via kinetic mixing with the photon (χ). The authors note that astrophysical constraints on stellar cooling limit χ≲10−14, making the kinetic mixing term small but non-zero.
- Experimental Sensitivity: The paper highlights that current and future experiments (DUNE, JUNO, Hyper-Kamiokande, IceCube-Gen2, and dark matter detectors like LZ and XENONnT) are crucial for testing this framework. Low-threshold detectors are particularly sensitive to the ultra-light A′ mediator.
- Comparison with Fifth-Force Tests: The authors demonstrate that while high-precision gravity tests (e.g., MICROSCOPE, IUPUI) constrain the coupling for baryons, the enhanced B−L symmetry allows neutrino experiments to provide significantly stronger constraints on the gauge coupling gB−L when ϵ is sufficiently small.
Significance and Claims
The paper claims to uncover a "previously unexplored regime" in the assignment of U(1)B−L charges. Its significance lies in demonstrating that a gaugeable B−L symmetry can be strong for neutrinos without contradicting the non-observation of fifth forces on baryonic matter. This challenges the conventional wisdom that B−L gauge couplings must be universally tiny.
The authors argue that the enhanced coupling strength ϵ−1gB−L should be treated as a fundamental parameter of nature. They assert that probing this parameter is an immediate experimental priority to determine if it is smaller than O(1). The framework serves as a benchmark for ultralight new physics, offering a mechanism to evade cosmological and astrophysical constraints that typically plague models with light gauge bosons coupled to neutrinos. The paper concludes that the absence of bare neutrino mass terms permits this re-assignment of charges, opening a path to explain the neutrino mass hierarchy through symmetry and gravitational effects rather than high-scale seesaw mechanisms.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.
Get the best general relativity papers every week.
Trusted by researchers at Stanford, Cambridge, and the French Academy of Sciences.
Check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
Something went wrong. Try again?
No spam, unsubscribe anytime.