← Latest papers
💻 computer science

A System of Care, Not Control: Co-Designing Online Safety and Wellbeing Solutions with Guardians ad Litem for Youth in Child Welfare

This paper presents findings from a co-design workshop with Guardians ad Litem that identifies systemic barriers to supporting online safety for youth in the Child Welfare System and proposes holistic, multi-stakeholder technology solutions focused on fostering trust, communication, and agency rather than restrictive control.

Original authors: Johanna Olesk, Ozioma C. Oguine, Mariana Fernandez Espinosa, Alexis B. Peirce Caudell, Karla Badillo-Urquiola

Published 2026-03-17
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Johanna Olesk, Ozioma C. Oguine, Mariana Fernandez Espinosa, Alexis B. Peirce Caudell, Karla Badillo-Urquiola

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine a young person navigating a vast, stormy ocean. For most kids, they have a sturdy boat, a map, and a captain (their parents) who knows how to steer. But for kids in the Child Welfare System (CWS)—those in foster care or dealing with family trauma—their boat is often leaking, they don't have a map, and the "captains" around them keep changing.

This paper is about a group of people called Guardians ad Litem (GALs). Think of them as the "official referees" appointed by the court. Their job is to make sure these vulnerable kids are safe and happy. But there's a problem: the ocean has changed. It's no longer just the physical world; it's also the internet. And the referees aren't sure how to keep the kids safe online without ruining their chance to have fun or make friends.

Here is the story of what the researchers found and what they propose, explained simply.

The Problem: The "All-or-Nothing" Trap

Right now, when adults try to keep these kids safe online, they often act like they are building a fortress. They lock the doors, ban the phones, and say, "No internet allowed!"

The paper argues this is like trying to teach someone to swim by throwing them into a pool and then immediately pulling them out because the water is scary.

  • The Issue: These kids are already lonely and hurting. The internet is often the only place they feel heard or understood. If you cut them off completely, they just go online in secret, without any safety net, making them easy targets for predators.
  • The Referees' Struggle: The GALs (the referees) feel helpless. They don't know how TikTok or Snapchat works. They don't have a clear rulebook from the court. And the adults around the kid (foster parents, bio parents, social workers) often fight over who is in charge, sending mixed messages. It's like a relay race where everyone is running in a different direction.

The Solution: A "Care Team" Instead of a "Police Force"

The researchers sat down with 10 GALs and asked, "If you could invent a magic tool to help these kids, what would it look like?"

Instead of building a bigger wall, the GALs imagined a high-tech safety net that works like a team sport. They came up with three main ideas:

1. The "Digital Buddy" (The Avatar)

Imagine a friendly, customizable video game character that lives inside the kid's phone.

  • How it works: This isn't a spy camera. It's a therapist-bot. If the kid is feeling sad or angry, the avatar says, "Hey, let's take a break and breathe."
  • The Magic: It teaches the kid how to handle emotions and spot danger, but it does it like a friend, not a boss. It only alerts a human adult if the kid is in real danger (like self-harm), protecting the kid's privacy while keeping them safe.

2. The "Clear Channel" (The Unified App)

Right now, the adults in a child's life talk on different apps, send emails, and whisper in corners. Information gets lost or twisted.

  • The Fix: The GALs imagined one secure app where everyone (the referee, the foster mom, the therapist, the bio dad) can talk.
  • The Magic: It's like a group chat with guardrails. The kid can choose who sees what. If they want to talk to their therapist privately, the foster mom doesn't see it. But if there's a safety issue, the right people get notified immediately. This stops the "he said, she said" drama and makes sure everyone is on the same page.

3. The "Bridge to Reality"

The goal isn't to keep the kid glued to the screen. It's to help them move from the digital world back to the real world.

  • The Fix: The tools would gently remind the kid to put the phone down, read a book, or go for a walk.
  • The Magic: Think of it as a digital coach that says, "You've been playing for an hour; let's go build a fort with your foster dad." It helps the kid practice real-life relationships, which is what they need most.

The Big Lesson: Care, Not Control

The most important takeaway from this paper is a shift in mindset.

  • Old Way: "We must control the child to keep them safe." (Like a prison guard).
  • New Way: "We must build a relationship so the child wants to be safe." (Like a trusted coach).

The researchers realized that for kids who have been hurt before, trust is the only real safety gear. If you build a system based on spying and locking things down, the kids will break it. But if you build a system based on listening, understanding, and teamwork, the kids will feel safe enough to ask for help when things go wrong.

In short: We need to stop trying to be the "Internet Police" for these kids and start being their "Internet Coaches." We need to build a system that cares for their hearts, not just a system that controls their screens.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →