← Latest papers
🤖 machine learning

From Rights to Rites: Expectations Management in Smart-Home AI

Through 33 interviews with industry practitioners, this paper introduces "Expectations Management" (EM), a model that moves beyond traditional trust theories to explain how designers navigate moral and cultural tensions when shaping user expectations for smart-home AI.

Original authors: Varad Vishwarupe, Ivan Flechais, Marina Jirotka, Nigel Shadbolt

Published 2026-04-28
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Varad Vishwarupe, Ivan Flechais, Marina Jirotka, Nigel Shadbolt

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The "Polite Houseguest" Problem: Making Smart Homes Feel Like Home

Imagine you invite a new houseguest to stay with you. On paper, they are the perfect guest: they are incredibly helpful, they clean the dishes without being asked, and they always remember your favorite snack.

But there’s a catch. They don't understand "vibes." They might start cleaning your bedroom while you’re changing, or they might interrupt a serious family conversation just to tell you that your smart toaster is ready. Technically, they are doing exactly what they were hired to do—being "helpful"—but socially, they are being rude, intrusive, and creepy.

This paper, "From Rights to Rites," explores this exact problem in the world of Smart-Home AI (like Alexa, Google Nest, or smart thermostats).


The Core Idea: "Rights" vs. "Rites"

The researchers found that building a smart home isn't just about following the rules; it’s about following the "unwritten rules." They call this the tension between Rights and Rites.

  • The "Rights" (The Rulebook): These are the hard rules. "The device must protect user privacy," "The device must follow GDPR laws," and "The device must be safe." This is like a guest following the house rules: Don't smoke inside, and don't steal the silver.
  • The "Rites" (The Social Vibe): These are the unwritten, cultural traditions of a home. It’s knowing when to be quiet, how to show respect to elders, and how much "help" is too much. This is like a guest knowing that even though they can walk into the living room, they shouldn't do it while the family is mourning or celebrating.

The problem? Most AI companies are great at the "Rights" (the rules), but they struggle with the "Rites" (the social etiquette).


The Three Stages of Managing Expectations

The researchers interviewed experts from Amazon, Google, and Microsoft to see how they try to manage these "social vibes." They discovered that managing expectations is a continuous cycle, much like raising a child or training a pet:

  1. Shaping (The First Impression): This is how the AI is introduced. Does it sound like a helpful butler or a bossy supervisor? Designers try to "shape" the AI's personality through its tone and how it asks for permission.
  2. Calibrating (Reading the Room): This is the hardest part. A good guest knows when to step back. The researchers found that designers are trying to teach AI to "read the room"—to notice if a user is being silent because they are busy or silent because they are annoyed. It’s about teaching the AI restraint.
  3. Repairing (The Apology): When the AI inevitably messes up (like interrupting a private moment), it can't just fix a line of code. It has to "repair" the relationship. This means the AI needs to apologize in a way that feels sincere and culturally appropriate, rather than just saying, "Error 404: I am sorry."

The Four Great Tensions (The "Tightrope Walk")

Designing a smart home is like walking a tightrope. If you lean too far one way, you fall. Designers are constantly balancing four specific tensions:

  • Helpfulness vs. Intrusiveness: Do I remind you to take your medicine (Helpful), or am I hovering over your shoulder while you eat dinner (Intrusive)?
  • Automation vs. Autonomy: Should I turn off the lights to save energy (Automation), or should I let you decide when it's dark enough (Autonomy)?
  • Personalization vs. Predictability: I know you like the lights dim at 8 PM (Personalization), but if I do it without asking, do I feel like a spy (Predictability)?
  • Transparency vs. Obscurity: Should I tell you every single thing I'm doing (Transparency), or will that constant talking become annoying noise (Obscurity)?

The Bottom Line

The paper concludes that making a "smart" home isn't just a technical challenge of making machines faster or smarter. It is a moral and cultural challenge.

To truly succeed, AI shouldn't just be a tool that follows the law; it needs to be a "guest" that understands the delicate, sacred, and unwritten rituals of human life. It needs to know not just what it can do, but what it should do.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →