← Latest papers
🔢 mathematics

Unbounded logarithmic limsup in Erd\H{o}s problem 684

The paper proves that the function f(n)f(n) from Erdős problem 684 is unbounded relative to logn\log n by constructing a sequence of integers nn for which f(n)f(n) grows faster than any constant multiple of logn\log n.

Original authors: Ji Ho Bae

Published 2026-04-28
📖 4 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Ji Ho Bae

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The Mystery of the "Smooth" Numbers: A Story of Mathematical Chaos

Imagine you are a professional organizer. Your job is to take a massive, chaotic pile of numbers and sort them into two boxes:

  1. The "Small-Fry" Box: Contains only numbers made of "small" building blocks (prime numbers like 2, 3, 5, 7...).
  2. The "Giant" Box: Contains the "leftovers"—the big, heavy prime numbers that are too large to fit in the small box.

In mathematics, there is a famous puzzle called Erdős Problem 684. It asks: How "small" can we keep our building blocks if we want the "Small-Fry" box to be almost as big as the original pile?

For a long time, mathematicians thought there was a predictable limit. They thought that as the pile of numbers grew, the size of the building blocks needed to stay relatively small—specifically, they thought the limit grew at a steady, predictable rate (logarithmically).

Ji Ho Bae has just proven that this intuition is wrong. He has shown that the building blocks don't just grow; they can explode in size unpredictably. The "limit" isn't a ceiling; it's an open sky.


The Strategy: The "Perfectly Imperfect" Multiplier

To prove this, Bae couldn't just pick random numbers. He had to engineer a very specific, very strange number that would "trick" the sorting process. He used three main "tools" to build this mathematical trap:

1. The Kummer Carry-Free Zone (The "No-Spill" Rule)

Imagine you are stacking blocks. Usually, if you stack them too high, they tip over or "carry over" into the next column. In math, when you add numbers, "carries" change how prime factors are distributed.
Bae used a clever trick (called Kummer’s Theorem) to build a number where, for all the small building blocks, no carries happen. It’s like building a tower so perfectly balanced that even as it gets huge, not a single block wobbles. This keeps the "Small-Fry" box under control for a long time.

2. The QM-Box (The "Precision Lock")

Now, Bae needed to make sure that once the building blocks got slightly larger, they would behave in a very specific, chaotic way.
He created something called a QM-Box. Think of this as a high-tech combination lock. To make his "trap" work, he needed to find a number (a "multiplier") that fits a massive system of simultaneous locks. Each lock is a different prime number, and each one has a different, complex setting.

3. The Timofeev Method (The "Crowd Control" Expert)

The hardest part of the paper is proving that such a "multiplier" actually exists. It’s like trying to find one specific person in a crowd of billions who is wearing a red hat, blue shoes, and holding a yellow umbrella, all while they are walking in a specific pattern.
Bae uses a heavy-duty mathematical tool called Timofeev’s method. This tool is like a super-computer that analyzes "crowds" of numbers. It proves that even though the requirements are incredibly strict, there are still enough numbers out there that "the person in the red hat" is guaranteed to exist.


The Grand Reveal: The Sky is the Limit

By combining these tools, Bae constructed a sequence of numbers where the "Small-Fry" box stays surprisingly small for a very long time, even as the total number gets astronomically large.

He proved that the ratio between the "building block size" and the "number size" doesn't settle down to a fixed number. Instead, it keeps climbing higher and higher, forever.

In short: Mathematicians thought they knew the speed limit of this mathematical process. Bae proved that there is no speed limit—the numbers can accelerate into infinity.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →