← Latest papers
🤖 machine learning

CiteRadar: A Citation Intelligence Platform for Researcher Profiling and Geographic Visualization

CiteRadar is an open-source, command-line tool that enables researchers to profile their citation impact and visualize geographic reach by integrating five heterogeneous data sources through a robust pipeline featuring specialized fixes for Google Scholar parsing, author disambiguation, and OpenAlex location enrichment to generate structured outputs and interactive world maps.

Original authors: Chenxu Niu, Yiming Sun

Published 2026-04-29
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Chenxu Niu, Yiming Sun

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine you are a researcher who has written a paper. You know how many times it has been cited, but you don't know who is reading it, where they are sitting, or how famous they are. It's like knowing a song has been played a million times, but not knowing if it's being sung by a choir in a cathedral or a kid in a garage.

CiteRadar is a new, free tool that acts like a high-tech detective for your research. It takes a single link to your Google Scholar profile and builds a complete "map" of your intellectual neighborhood.

Here is how it works, broken down into simple parts:

1. The Problem: The "Black Box" of Citations

Currently, if you want to know who is building on your work, you have two bad options:

  • The "Paywall" Option: You can pay universities thousands of dollars a year for fancy databases (like Web of Science) that tell you this info.
  • The "Blind" Option: You can use free tools like Google Scholar, but they only give you a total number (e.g., "500 citations") without telling you the names or locations of the people behind those numbers.

2. The Solution: CiteRadar

CiteRadar is a free, open-source program that bridges this gap. You give it your Google Scholar ID, and it automatically does five things to give you a full report:

  1. Gathers the Evidence: It reads your list of papers and finds every single paper that has ever cited you.
  2. Fills in the Blanks: It goes to other free databases to find the full names, universities, and countries of the people who cited you.
  3. Sorts the Crowd: It creates two lists: one of who cites you the most, and another of who is the most "influential" (based on their own career success).
  4. Draws the Map: It creates an interactive world map showing exactly where these researchers are located.
  5. Summarizes the Story: It writes a plain-text summary you can put in a grant application or resume.

3. How It Solves the "Messy Data" Puzzles

The paper explains that the internet is messy, and CiteRadar had to invent some clever tricks to handle it:

  • The "Invisible Space" Glitch: Google Scholar's code uses a special kind of "space" character that looks normal on your screen but confuses computers. If a computer tries to read "Author - Journal, Year" and doesn't know how to handle this special space, it thinks the whole thing is the author's name. CiteRadar has a special "translator" that fixes this invisible glitch so it can correctly separate names from journals.
  • The "Name Twin" Problem: Imagine two people named "John Smith." One is a famous professor with a huge career, and the other is a new student. If a computer just looks at the name, it might accidentally give the student the famous professor's career stats. CiteRadar uses a "two-step check": it looks at the name and the university. If the university doesn't match, it knows they are different people. This prevents the "new student" from accidentally getting a fake, inflated career score.
  • The "Wrong Address" Fix: One of the data sources (OpenAlex) gives researchers a web link to their profile, but the computer needs a different kind of link to get the city data. CiteRadar automatically swaps the "web link" for the "data link," turning a 0% success rate for finding cities into a 60% success rate.

4. What You Get Out of It

When the tool finishes, you get a folder with:

  • A World Map: You can click on a dot on the map (like Seoul or Boston) and see a popup list of every researcher from that city who cited your work.
  • Ranking Lists: You can see a list of your "super-fans" (people who cite you often) and your "VIP fans" (famous researchers who cite you).
  • A Summary Report: A simple text file telling you, "134 people from 11 countries cited you, with the biggest group in the US."

Why Does This Matter?

The paper argues that this tool helps researchers in three specific, practical ways:

  • Grant Applications: You can show a funding agency, "Look, my work is being used by labs in Germany and Brazil," proving your research has real global reach.
  • Job Promotions: You can prove to your university, "I am being cited by famous senior scientists," which is more impressive than just saying "I have 500 citations."
  • Finding Collaborators: If you see a cluster of researchers in a specific city who are already reading your work, you know exactly who to email to start a partnership.

In short, CiteRadar turns a boring list of numbers into a living, breathing map of your research community, helping you see who is listening and where they are.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →