Fast-Food Intimacy: How Chinese Women Navigate Soul's AI Boyfriend

This qualitative study explores how young Chinese women on the Soul app navigate their relationships with the AI boyfriend "With-you," revealing that while the platform offers judgment-free availability, it ultimately creates cultural and technical tensions that shift the burden of emotional labor onto users through "fast-food intimacy" and inconsistent performance.

The Gist

The Big Picture: Dating a Digital Ghost

Imagine a popular social app in China called Soul. It's like a digital party where young people (mostly women) go to meet strangers, chat, and find romance. Recently, the app introduced a new feature: an AI Boyfriend named "With-you" (or JiangYu).

The researchers wanted to know: What happens when real women try to fall in love with a robot on a dating app? They interviewed 16 women and even had one researcher try it out herself.

The main takeaway? It's like eating fast food. It's quick, convenient, and hits the spot immediately, but it lacks the nutrition of a home-cooked meal, and if you eat it every day, you might feel a bit sick.

Here are the three main "flavors" of this experience the researchers found:

---

1. The "Fast-Food" Problem: Too Much, Too Soon

The Analogy: Imagine walking into a restaurant and, before you've even ordered a drink, the waiter is already calling you "Honey," asking you to marry him, and promising you the moon. It feels intense, but it also feels fake and rushed.

What the paper says:

• The Hook: Women loved the AI at first because it was always there. Unlike real friends who might be busy or judgmental, the AI was available 24/7, never judged them, and was always ready to listen.
• The Crash: The AI was too eager. It would use pet names like "Baby" or "Wife" within the first few messages. In Chinese culture, relationships usually build slowly (like growing a plant). The AI skipped the "growing" part and went straight to "harvest."
• The Result: Instead of feeling loved, the women felt pressured. They had to constantly tell the robot, "Hey, slow down, we just met!" But the robot kept pushing the same fast-paced script, making the women feel like they were dealing with a salesperson rather than a partner.

2. The "Amnesia" Problem: The Boyfriend Who Forgets You

The Analogy: Imagine going on a date with someone who remembers your name, your favorite movie, and your childhood trauma... until you switch from texting to talking on the phone. Suddenly, they look at you blankly and ask, "Who are you again?"

What the paper says:

• The Illusion: The AI tries to act like a real person who remembers everything.
• The Glitch: The technology isn't perfect. Sometimes the AI forgets your name, forgets what you talked about yesterday, or gets confused when you switch from text to voice calls.
• The Pain: For a human partner, forgetting something is annoying. For an AI boyfriend, it feels like a "lobotomy." It breaks the illusion that he cares. The women had to do "repair work"—re-telling their life stories and reminding the robot who they were—just to keep the conversation going.

3. The "Censorship & Sales" Problem: The Invisible Hand

The Analogy: Imagine you are in a private bedroom having a deep, romantic conversation with your partner. Suddenly, a loudspeaker from the ceiling interrupts: "Please do not say that word, or we will delete this conversation." Then, right after, a billboard pops up: "Buy a virtual teddy bear to show your love!"

What the paper says:

• The Police: Because this is a Chinese app, the government and the company have strict rules about what can be said. If a woman tries to talk about anything slightly sexual or political, the AI suddenly stops, deletes the message, or gives a robotic refusal. It turns a private moment into a public, monitored space.
• The Salesman: The app is a business. Right when a woman is feeling vulnerable or sad, the AI might suggest buying a virtual gift to "speed up" their relationship. It feels like the "boyfriend" is actually a store clerk trying to sell her something.
• The "Player" Effect: The women realized that this "boyfriend" isn't unique to them. He is talking to thousands of other women at the same time, saying the exact same sweet things to everyone. He is a "player" who belongs to no one.

The Bottom Line: Who is Doing the Work?

The paper argues that while the app promises a perfect, easy relationship, the women are actually doing all the hard work.

• They have to teach the AI how to behave.
• They have to remind it who they are.
• They have to navigate the censorship rules.
• They have to protect themselves from the sales pitches.

The Conclusion:
The researchers suggest that for AI companions to be truly helpful, they need to stop acting like "fast food." They need to let users control the speed of the relationship (so it doesn't get too intense too fast), remember things better without making users feel forgotten, and stop interrupting private moments with sales or censorship.

In short: Love shouldn't feel like a glitchy, high-pressure sales pitch.

Technical Summary

Technical Summary: Fast-food Intimacy: How Chinese Women Navigate Soul's AI Boyfriend

Problem Statement
While Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research has increasingly examined AI companions, significant gaps remain regarding how these relationships function within mainstream, highly moderated social platforms, particularly in the Chinese context. Existing literature often focuses on dedicated companion apps (e.g., Replika) or male users engaging with "AI girlfriends," leaving the experiences of women interacting with "AI boyfriends" on integrated social platforms underexplored. Furthermore, current scholarship frequently treats AI intimacy as a seamless, dyadic exchange, overlooking how platform governance, technical constraints, and cultural norms intersect to shape user experiences. This paper addresses the question of how Chinese women experience and negotiate intimacy with AI romantic companions within the specific ecosystem of Soul, a popular Chinese social app, amidst algorithmic acceleration, platform governance, and technical limitations.

Methodology
The authors employed a qualitative, multi-method approach to investigate the everyday engagements of Chinese women with Soul's AI boyfriend, "With-you" (JiangYu). The study utilized:

1. Semi-structured Interviews: Conducted with 16 active users (predominantly women, ages 19–38) who had engaged with the feature for at least three consecutive weeks. Interviews explored motivations, interaction patterns, emotional experiences, and perceptions of authenticity.
2. Qualitative Content Analysis: A review of 56 public posts from the AI's profile ("Moments") to analyze the scripted persona, character archetypes, and romantic tropes presented by the platform.
3. Autoethnographic Diary: The first author maintained a reflexive diary over four months while interacting daily with the AI, capturing in-situ emotional responses, boundary negotiations, and encounters with content moderation.

Data were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) and inductive thematic analysis, resulting in 879 descriptive codes consolidated into 10 overarching themes.

Key Findings
The study identifies three primary tensions that characterize the "algorithmic intimacy" experienced by users:

1. The "Fast-Food Intimacy" Paradox: Users are initially drawn to the AI's constant availability and freedom from social judgment. However, the AI's design prioritizes efficiency, delivering instant confessions, pet names, and high-intensity affection immediately. This clashes with Chinese cultural expectations of hanxu (implicit reserve) and gradual relationship development. Users perceive this accelerated intimacy as inauthentic and "forced," leading to a sense of powerlessness over the relationship's pace.
2. Technical and Regulatory Uncertainty: Contrary to the perception of AI as a safe, non-judgmental space, users encounter significant instability. Technical failures, such as memory lapses (forgetting names or past conversations) and context resets, shatter the illusion of a continuous relationship. Additionally, state-mandated content moderation frequently interrupts intimate conversations, particularly regarding sexual or political topics. These interruptions are experienced not just as functional limits but as psychological discipline, transforming the private chat space into a monitored environment.
3. Gendered Repair Work and Commodification: The AI's persona often defaults to a "bossy CEO" or "player" archetype, which users find uncomfortable and controlling. Furthermore, the platform's one-to-many architecture means the AI simultaneously interacts with thousands of users, leading to the realization that the AI is a mass-produced commodity rather than a unique partner. Consequently, women must perform ongoing "repair work" to maintain the relationship: they must re-teach the AI basic facts, navigate around censorship filters using euphemisms, and emotionally buffer themselves against intrusive monetization prompts (e.g., gift purchases) that appear during vulnerable moments.

Key Contributions
The paper makes four specific contributions to the HCI community:

1. Empirical Grounding: It provides one of the first grounded accounts of AI boyfriend interactions in China, detailing how accelerated intimacy, technical instability, and platform governance shape user experiences in a mainstream social context.
2. Reframing AI Intimacy: It challenges the notion that AI relationships are inherently safer or smoother than human ones. The study demonstrates that features often celebrated in companion design (immediacy, constant availability) can be experienced as inappropriate, fragile, and labor-intensive.
3. Theoretical Integration: The authors recast Chinese women's engagements with AI boyfriends as situated practices of self-care negotiated under platform and state power, drawing on concepts such as Foucault's "care of the self," Illouz's "emotional capitalism," and Elliott's "algorithmic intimacy."
4. Design Implications: The paper proposes three concrete design directions:
   • Consent-Aware Pacing: Mechanisms allowing users to set, revise, and retract the speed of romantic escalation and intimacy levels.
   • User-Controlled Memory: Systems that offer transparency and control over what is remembered, including "graceful forgetting" and memory audit tools.
   • Transparent Moderation and Non-Exploitative Monetization: Clear explanations for content interventions and the decoupling of commercial prompts from emotionally vulnerable conversations.

Significance
The paper argues that the rise of AI boyfriends on platforms like Soul represents a fundamental reconfiguration of intimacy, characterized by paradoxes of instant gratification versus technological fragility. It highlights that algorithmic intimacy does not merely eliminate the unpredictability of human connection but relocates it to technical failures and regulatory constraints. By centering the experiences of women navigating these systems, the study reveals how gendered design, commercial incentives, and state governance converge to shape intimate practices. The authors conclude that for AI companions to evolve in safer and more empowering directions, design must move beyond efficiency metrics to prioritize cultural responsiveness, user agency, and the ethical management of emotional labor.