← Latest papers
⚛️ phenomenology

Charmonium-nucleon femtoscopy as a possible probe of the nucleon gravitational form factor

This paper proposes using charmonium-nucleon femtoscopy as a probe of the nucleon's gravitational form factors by constructing an effective potential from lattice-QCD data and HAL QCD constraints to evaluate correlation functions sensitive to the nucleon's DD-form factor.

Original authors: Ren Ejima, Daisuke Fujii, Mamiya Kawaguchi

Published 2026-07-02
📖 3 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Ren Ejima, Daisuke Fujii, Mamiya Kawaguchi

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the proton (a particle inside an atom's nucleus) not as a solid marble, but as a tiny, vibrating balloon filled with invisible forces. Scientists have long wanted to map out exactly how the energy and pressure are distributed inside this balloon. They call these maps "Gravitational Form Factors." One specific part of this map, called the "D-term," is like the blueprint for the internal pressure and stress—essentially, how the balloon holds itself together without popping.

For a long time, this "D-term" has been the "last unknown global property" of the proton. We know it exists, but we haven't been able to measure it directly. Usually, scientists try to figure it out by firing high-energy beams at protons and analyzing the scattered debris (a bit like trying to understand a car's engine by smashing it and looking at the broken parts).

The New Idea: Listening to the Echo
This paper proposes a different way to "listen" to the proton's internal pressure. Instead of smashing it, the authors suggest looking at how a proton interacts with a charmonium particle.

Think of charmonium (specifically the J/ψJ/\psi and ψ(2S)\psi(2S) particles) as a tiny, heavy, and very compact "probe" or "diver."

  • The proton is the ocean.
  • The charmonium is the diver.
  • The interaction is how the water pushes back on the diver.

The authors use a theoretical framework (based on Quantum Chromodynamics, or QCD) to build a "map" of the ocean (the proton) based on its pressure and energy. They then drop their "diver" (the charmonium) into this map to see how it behaves.

The Experiment: Two Different Divers
The researchers tested two different types of divers to see which one could best feel the pressure of the ocean:

  1. The J/ψJ/\psi Diver: This is a standard, compact diver. The authors found that when this diver moves through the proton's "ocean," the resulting interaction (measured as a correlation function) is somewhat "deaf" to the specific details of the internal pressure (the D-term). It's like a small boat floating on a calm sea; it doesn't feel the subtle shifts in water pressure very well. The paper shows that changing the internal pressure settings doesn't change the boat's path much.

  2. The ψ(2S)\psi(2S) Diver: This is a larger, more sensitive diver (a higher energy state). The authors found that this diver is much more sensitive to the internal pressure. When they adjusted the "D-term" (the pressure map) in their calculations, the path of this larger diver changed noticeably. It's like a large submarine that feels every shift in the water's density.

The Conclusion
The paper concludes that while the standard J/ψJ/\psi interaction isn't a great tool for measuring the proton's internal pressure, the larger ψ(2S)\psi(2S) interaction might be a very sensitive probe.

By studying how these particles correlate (how they move together) in high-energy collisions (like those at the Large Hadron Collider), scientists might be able to "see" the proton's internal pressure map in a new way. This wouldn't replace current methods but would offer a complementary perspective, like using a different kind of sonar to map the ocean floor.

Important Caveat
The authors are careful to note that this is currently a theoretical investigation. They haven't extracted the final, perfect map of the proton yet. They are essentially saying, "If we can pin down some of the unknown numbers in our model, this method could become a powerful new tool to measure the proton's internal stress." They are not claiming to have solved the mystery of the proton's structure today, but rather identifying a promising new path to do so.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →