← Latest papers
⚛️ high-energy experiments

Search for axion-like particles decaying to two photons at Belle II

Using 408 fb⁻¹ of data from the Belle II detector, researchers searched for axion-like particles decaying into two photons across a mass range of 0.17 to 9.80 GeV/c², found no significant excess, and established the most restrictive upper limits to date on the ALP-photon coupling for masses below 5.00 GeV/c².

Original authors: Belle II Collaboration, M. Abumusabh, I. Adachi, A. Aggarwal, H. Ahmed, Y. Ahn, H. Aihara, M. Akdag, N. Akopov, S. Alghamdi, M. Alhakami, A. Aloisio, N. Althubiti, K. Amos, M. Angelsmark, N. Anh Ky, C
Published 2026-07-10
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Belle II Collaboration, M. Abumusabh, I. Adachi, A. Aggarwal, H. Ahmed, Y. Ahn, H. Aihara, M. Akdag, N. Akopov, S. Alghamdi, M. Alhakami, A. Aloisio, N. Althubiti, K. Amos, M. Angelsmark, N. Anh Ky, C. Antonioli, K. Arai, D. M. Asner, H. Atmacan, T. Aushev, V. Aushev, R. Ayad, V. Babu, H. Bae, N. K. Baghel, S. Bahinipati, P. Bambade, Sw. Banerjee, S. Bansal, M. Barrett, M. Bartl, J. Baudot, A. Baur, A. Beaubien, F. Becherer, J. Becker, G. F. Benfratello, J. V. Bennett, F. U. Bernlochner, V. Bertacchi, M. Bertemes, E. Bertholet, M. Bessner, S. Bettarini, V. Bhardwaj, B. Bhuyan, F. Bianchi, T. Bilka, A. Biswas, D. Biswas, A. Bobrov, D. Bodrov, A. Bondar, G. Bonvicini, J. Borah, A. Boschetti, A. Bozek, M. Bračko, P. Branchini, T. E. Browder, A. Budano, S. Bussino, F. Callet, Q. Campagna, M. Campajola, L. Cao, M. Carminati, G. Casarosa, C. Cecchi, M. -C. Chang, P. Cheema, L. Chen, B. G. Cheon, C. Cheshta, H. Chetri, K. Chilikin, K. Chirapatpimol, H. -E. Cho, K. Cho, S. -J. Cho, S. -K. Choi, S. Choudhury, S. Chutia, J. Cochran, J. A. Colorado-Caicedo, I. Consigny, L. Corona, D. Crook, S. Cuccuini, J. X. Cui, E. De La Cruz-Burelo, S. A. De La Motte, G. De Nardo, G. De Pietro, R. de Sangro, M. Destefanis, S. Dey, R. Dhayal, A. Di Canto, J. Dingfelder, Z. Doležal, X. Dong, M. Dorigo, C. Driver, K. Dugic, G. Dujany, P. Ecker, D. Epifanov, J. Eppelt, R. Farkas, P. Feichtinger, T. Ferber, T. Fillinger, C. Finck, G. Finocchiaro, F. Forti, A. Frey, B. G. Fulsom, A. Gabrielli, P. Gagneja, A. Gale, E. Ganiev, M. Garcia-Hernandez, A. Garmash, L. Gärtner, G. Gaudino, V. Gaur, V. Gautam, A. Gaz, P. Gebeline, A. Gellrich, G. Ghevondyan, D. Ghosh, H. Ghumaryan, G. Giakoustidis, D. Giesegh, R. Giordano, A. Giri, P. Gironella Gironell, A. Glazov, B. Gobbo, R. Godang, O. Gogota, W. Gradl, E. Graziani, D. Greenwald, Y. Guan, K. Gudkova, I. Haide, H. Haigh, Y. Han, K. Hayasaka, H. Hayashii, S. Hazra, C. Hearty, M. T. Hedges, A. Heidelbach, G. Heine, I. Heredia de la Cruz, M. Hernández Villanueva, T. Higuchi, M. Hoek, M. Hohmann, R. Hoppe, P. Horak, X. T. Hou, C. -L. Hsu, T. Humair, T. Iijima, K. Inami, G. Inguglia, N. Ipsita, A. Ishikawa, R. Itoh, M. Iwasaki, P. Jackson, D. Jacobi, W. W. Jacobs, E. -J. Jang, Q. P. Ji, S. Jia, Y. Jin, A. Johnson, K. K. Joo, K. H. Kang, G. Karyan, T. Kawasaki, F. Keil, C. Ketter, C. Kiesling, C. Kim, D. Y. Kim, H. Kim, J. -Y. Kim, K. -H. Kim, H. Kindo, K. Kinoshita, P. Kodyš, T. Koga, S. Kohani, A. Korobov, S. Korpar, E. Kovalenko, R. Kowalewski, M. Krein, P. Križan, P. Krokovny, T. Kuhr, Y. Kulii, D. Kumar, K. Kumara, T. Kunigo, A. Kuzmin, Y. -J. Kwon, S. Lacaprara, T. Lam, J. S. Lange, T. S. Lau, R. Leboucher, F. R. Le Diberder, H. Lee, M. J. Lee, C. Lemettais, P. Leo, P. M. Lewis, C. Li, L. K. Li, Q. M. Li, S. X. Li, W. Z. Li, Y. Li, Y. B. Li, Y. P. Liao, J. Libby, J. Lin, S. Lin, Z. Liptak, V. Lisovskyi, C. Liu, G. Liu, M. H. Liu, Q. Y. Liu, Z. Q. Liu, D. Liventsev, S. Longo, A. Lozar, T. Lueck, C. Lyu, J. L. Ma, Y. Ma, M. Maggiora, S. P. Maharana, R. Maiti, G. Mancinelli, R. Manfredi, E. Manoni, M. Mantovano, D. Marcantonio, S. Marcello, M. Marfoli, C. Marinas, C. Martellini, A. Martens, T. Martinov, L. Massaccesi, M. Masuda, T. Matsuda, D. Matvienko, S. K. Maurya, M. Maushart, J. A. McKenna, Z. Mediankin Gruberová, R. Mehta, F. Meier, D. Meleshko, M. Merola, C. Miller, M. Mirra, K. Miyabayashi, H. Miyake, R. Mizuk, G. B. Mohanty, S. Moneta, A. L. Moreira de Carvalho, H. -G. Moser, N. Mudgal, Th. Muller, H. Murakami, R. Mussa, K. R. Nakamura, M. Nakao, Y. Nakazawa, M. Naruki, Z. Natkaniec, A. Natochii, M. Nayak, M. Neu, S. Nishida, R. Nomaru, S. Ogawa, R. Okubo, H. Ono, Y. Onuki, I. Ostrowski, G. Pakhlova, S. Pardi, J. Park, K. Park, S. -H. Park, A. Passeri, S. Patra, T. K. Pedlar, R. Pestotnik, M. Piccolo, L. E. Piilonen, P. L. M. Podesta-Lerma, T. Podobnik, L. Polat, A. Prakash, V. Prasad, C. Praz, S. Prell, E. Prencipe, M. T. Prim, S. Privalov, I. Prudiiev, H. Purwar, P. Rados, S. Raiz, K. Ravindran, J. U. Rehman, M. Reif, S. Reiter, M. Remnev, L. Reuter, D. Ricalde Herrmann, I. Ripp-Baudot, G. Rizzo, S. H. Robertson, J. M. Roney, A. Rostomyan, N. Rout, G. Russo, S. Saha, L. Salutari, D. A. Sanders, S. Sandilya, L. Santelj, C. Santos, V. Savinov, B. Scavino, J. Schmitz, S. Schneider, M. Schnepf, K. Schoenning, C. Schwanda, Y. Seino, K. Senyo, J. Serrano, M. E. Sevior, C. Sfienti, W. Shan, C. P. Shen, X. D. Shi, T. Shillington, T. Shimasaki, J. -G. Shiu, D. Shtol, B. Shwartz, A. Sibidanov, F. Simon, J. B. Singh, J. Skorupa, A. Soffer, A. Sokolov, E. Solovieva, W. Song, S. Spataro, K. Špenko, B. Spruck, M. Starič, P. Stavroulakis, S. Stefkova, R. Stroili, M. Sumihama, K. Sumisawa, M. Takahashi, M. Takizawa, U. Tamponi, K. Tanida, F. Testa, A. Thaller, D. V. Thanh, T. Tien Manh, O. Tittel, R. Tiwary, E. Torassa, K. Trabelsi, F. F. Trantou, I. Tsaklidis, M. Uchida, I. Ueda, T. Uglov, K. Unger, Y. Unno, K. Uno, S. Uno, P. Urquijo, Y. Ushiroda, S. E. Vahsen, R. van Tonder, K. E. Varvell, M. Veronesi, A. Vinokurova, V. S. Vismaya, L. Vitale, V. Vobbilisetti, R. Volk, R. Volpe, E. Waheed, M. Wakai, S. Wallner, M. -Z. Wang, X. L. Wang, A. Warburton, M. Watanabe, S. Watanuki, C. Wessel, X. P. Xu, B. D. Yabsley, S. Yamada, W. Yan, W. P. Yan, J. Yelton, K. Yi, J. H. Yin, K. Yoshihara, C. Z. Yuan, J. Yuan, L. Yuan, Y. Yusa, L. Zani, F. Zeng, M. Zeyrek, B. Zhang, X. Zhao, V. Zhilich, J. S. Zhou, Q. D. Zhou, X. Y. Zhou, L. Zhu, R. Žlebčík

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the universe is a giant, invisible ocean, and the Standard Model is the map we've drawn of the islands we can actually see. But scientists suspect there are hidden islands—secret realms of "dark matter" and mysterious particles lurking just out of sight. One of the most exciting suspects for a bridge between our visible world and these hidden ones is a ghostly particle called an Axion-Like Particle (ALP).

Think of an ALP as a shy, invisible chameleon. It doesn't like to be seen directly, but it has a secret superpower: it can briefly turn into a pair of photons (particles of light) and then vanish again. If we could catch it doing this magic trick, we'd have proof of a whole new layer of reality.

The Great Photon Hunt at Belle II

To play detective, the Belle II Collaboration set up a high-speed camera at the SuperKEKB collider in Japan. They smashed electrons and positrons (the antimatter twins of electrons) together at incredible speeds, creating a chaotic explosion of energy. They then waited to see if any of that energy would spontaneously spawn an ALP.

The plan was simple but tricky:

  1. The Setup: When an electron and positron collide, they usually just bounce off or create other known particles. But if an ALP exists, the collision might produce a single photon and an ALP (e+eγae^+e^- \to \gamma a).
  2. The Magic Trick: The ALP is unstable. It almost instantly splits into two more photons (aγγa \to \gamma\gamma).
  3. The Clue: So, the scientists looked for events where three photons appeared out of nowhere. One is the "recoil" photon from the collision, and the other two are the ALP's disguise.

They analyzed a massive amount of data, equivalent to 408 fb⁻¹ of integrated luminosity (a measure of how many collisions they watched). They scanned for ALPs with masses ranging from 0.17 GeV/c² to 9.80 GeV/c².

The Search for the "Bump"

Imagine you are listening to a very loud, static-filled radio station. You are looking for a specific, pure musical note that shouldn't be there. In the world of particle physics, this "note" is a narrow peak in a graph of photon masses. If ALPs exist, the two photons from the ALP decay would always have the same combined mass, creating a sharp spike in the data.

The team used a super-smart computer brain (a neural network) to filter out the "static"—the billions of ordinary background events that look like three photons but are just random noise from known physics. They also used a "kinematic fit," which is like a digital puzzle solver that forces the energy and momentum of the three photons to add up perfectly, sharpening their view of the data.

The Verdict: Silence is Golden (for now)

After sifting through the data, the result was a bit of a letdown for those hoping to find new physics immediately, but a huge victory for precision science: They found no ALPs.

There was no mysterious spike in the graph. The data looked exactly like what we expect from the Standard Model, with no extra "ghost" particles hiding in the noise. The biggest "bump" they saw was near 0.22 GeV/c², but it wasn't a real discovery; it was just a statistical fluke that, when you account for the fact that they looked at so many different masses, turned out to be only a 1.4σ global significance (which is like finding a few extra grains of sand on a beach and thinking you found a buried treasure chest).

What This Means for the "Chameleon"

Even though they didn't find the ALP, the paper is a massive success because it tells us exactly where the ALP isn't.

  • The Limits: The team set strict upper limits on how often these particles could be made. They calculated that if ALPs exist in the mass range of 0.17 GeV/c² to 5.00 GeV/c², their interaction with light (the coupling strength gaγγg_{a\gamma\gamma}) must be incredibly weak—less than 10⁻⁴ GeV⁻¹.
  • The Improvement: This is the tightest net ever cast in this specific mass range. They improved upon previous results by up to a factor of 9. In other words, if ALPs were "hiding" in this mass zone with a certain strength, the old experiments might have missed them, but the new Belle II data would have definitely seen them. Since they didn't, those specific types of ALPs are effectively ruled out.

The Bottom Line

The paper doesn't say ALPs don't exist at all; it just says they aren't the "loud, easy-to-find" kind in the mass range they checked. The "chameleon" is either even more invisible than we thought, or it's hiding in a different mass range entirely.

The authors have drawn a very precise "No Trespassing" sign over a huge chunk of the particle physics map. They haven't found the hidden island, but they've proven that if it's there, it's much smaller and quieter than we hoped. The search continues, but now we know exactly where not to look.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →