← Latest papers
🤖 machine learning

Sharpness-aware Model Merging with Salience Recovery for LLM-based Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation

This paper proposes SharpRec, a novel framework for LLM-based cross-domain sequential recommendation that addresses knowledge conflicts and performance saturation in model merging through sharpness-aware geometric alignment and preference salience activation to significantly outperform existing state-of-the-art baselines.

Original authors: Huwei Ji, Jiajie Su, Yuyuan Li, Xiaohua Feng, Chaochao Chen

Published 2026-07-29
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Huwei Ji, Jiajie Su, Yuyuan Li, Xiaohua Feng, Chaochao Chen

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine you are a librarian trying to recommend the perfect book to a visitor. If you only know they love sci-fi, you might suggest a space opera. But what if you also knew they secretly love cooking? A truly smart librarian could connect those dots, suggesting a sci-fi novel set in a futuristic kitchen. This is the dream of "Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation": using what a person likes in one area (like movies) to guess what they might enjoy in another (like books), even if they haven't explicitly told you about their new interests.

To do this, modern computers use "Large Language Models" (LLMs). Think of these as super-smart, well-read brains that understand the deep meaning of words, not just a list of keywords. They can figure out that "Star Wars" and "cooking" might share a theme of "epic journeys," even if the user never bought a cookbook. However, teaching these brains to juggle multiple interests at once is tricky. If you try to mix their knowledge of sports and toys, they might get confused, mixing up the rules of soccer with the rules of building blocks. This paper tackles the problem of how to combine these different "expert brains" into one super-brain without them tripping over each other or forgetting their unique skills.

The researchers, Huwei Ji and their team from Zhejiang University and Hangzhou Dianzi University, discovered that simply smashing different recommendation models together doesn't work well. They found two main problems. First, the models often have "geometric incompatibility." Imagine trying to merge two different puzzle pieces that were carved to fit into very different, jagged holes; if you force them together, the picture gets distorted. Second, they noticed a "saturation" effect. If you keep adding more and more sources of knowledge (like adding books, movies, sports, and toys), the model's performance hits a wall and stops improving. It's like mixing too many paints together; eventually, you just get a muddy brown instead of a vibrant new color. The team calls this "statistical homogenization," where the unique, sharp details of each interest get smoothed out into a boring average.

To fix this, the team built a new framework called SharpRec. They didn't just mash the models together; they gave them a makeover. First, they used a technique called "Sharpness-aware Geometric Alignment." Think of this as sanding down the jagged edges of the puzzle pieces before gluing them. By gently nudging the models to find "flat" spots in their learning landscape (places where small changes don't ruin the result), they made sure the different domains could fit together smoothly without crashing.

Second, they introduced "Preference Salience Activation." When the models were merged, the unique, high-value details (like a specific love for vintage toys) were getting lost in the crowd. SharpRec acts like a highlighter, finding those important, rare details that got smoothed out and boosting them back up. It's like taking a blurry photo and using software to sharpen the most important parts, ensuring the model remembers the specific things that make a user unique, rather than just a generic average.

The team tested SharpRec on real-world data from Amazon, looking at pairs like Books and Movies, or Sports and Toys. They found that their method consistently outperformed all the other top methods. In fact, while other methods hit a performance wall after combining just three or four different domains, SharpRec kept getting better and better as they added more sources. They also showed that it works even when there are very few users who overlap between the two domains, proving it doesn't need a massive crowd of people who like both things to make the connection.

In short, the paper suggests that by carefully aligning the "shape" of the models and actively protecting their most unique features, we can build recommendation systems that are not only smarter but also capable of learning from a vast array of different interests without getting confused or losing their edge. The results, measured by how often the system correctly guessed the next item a user would like, show that this approach is a significant step forward in making AI recommenders that truly understand our complex, multi-faceted lives.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →