Study of muon-tagged and decays to the final state
Using LHCb data from 2016–2018, this study measures the branching fraction of the to for the first time and performs a simultaneous amplitude analysis of and decays, revealing significant differences in their Dalitz-plot distributions that suggest distinct internal structures and potential exotic contributions.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Imagine the universe as a giant, cosmic LEGO set. For decades, scientists have been building structures out of tiny, fundamental blocks called quarks. Usually, these blocks snap together in pairs (like a charm quark and a strange quark) to form familiar particles called mesons. But recently, physicists have started finding "exotic" structures—particles made of four quarks stuck together in ways that don't fit the standard rules. It's like finding a LEGO creation that requires four specific bricks to hold together, defying the usual two-brick pattern.
To understand these strange new shapes, scientists need to look at how they fall apart. When a heavy particle decays, it breaks into lighter pieces, and the way those pieces fly apart tells a story about the particle's internal structure. Think of it like watching a shattered vase: if the pieces scatter in a specific, chaotic pattern, it might mean the vase was made of a single solid material. But if the pieces cluster in a weird way, it might suggest the vase was actually two different materials glued together. This is the puzzle the LHCb experiment at CERN is trying to solve: Are these exotic particles just heavy versions of normal particles, or are they something entirely new, like a "molecule" made of two other particles loosely bound together?
The Great Particle Detective Story
In this study, the LHCb collaboration acted as cosmic detectives, hunting for clues inside a specific type of particle decay. They focused on two "cousin" particles: the Ds1(2460)+ and the Ds1(2536)+. These two are very similar in mass and have the same "quantum numbers" (which is like saying they have the same spin and charge), so you might expect them to behave exactly the same way when they break apart.
The team looked at data collected between 2016 and 2018, sifting through billions of collisions to find cases where these particles decayed into a Ds+ meson and two pions (a Ds+ π+ π− trio). To find these rare events, they used a clever trick: they looked for a "muon tag." Since these particles often come from the decay of even heavier beauty hadrons, they searched for a muon (a heavy cousin of the electron) that was produced alongside the particle of interest. This helped them filter out the noise and focus on the signal.
The Plot Twist: Cousins with Different Personalities
The big surprise came when the scientists mapped out the "Dalitz plot" for each particle. You can think of a Dalitz plot as a map of the dance floor where the decay products are dancing. It shows exactly how the energy is shared between the three particles as they fly apart.
If the two cousin particles were just standard, boring versions of the same thing, their dance floors should look identical. But they didn't.
- The Ds1(2460)+ dance floor was chaotic and structured. It showed a distinct "double-peak" pattern and a strong preference for certain energy arrangements.
- The Ds1(2536)+ dance floor, by contrast, was much more uniform and smooth.
This difference is huge. It suggests that even though these two particles look similar on the outside, their internal structures are different. The authors suggest that the Ds1(2460)+ might contain a "molecular" component—a loose bond between a D meson* and a K meson (a D*K molecule). When this molecule decays, it leaves a specific fingerprint on the dance floor that the other cousin doesn't have.
Ruling Out the Boring Explanations
The scientists didn't just guess; they tested several theories to see which one fit the data.
- The "Just Resonances" Theory: They first tried to explain the messy dance floor of the Ds1(2460)+ using only standard resonances (like the f0(500) and f2(1270) particles) acting as intermediaries. This failed. The data simply didn't fit a model where only the two pions were interacting.
- The "Triangle Loop" Theory: They also tested a theory involving "triangle diagrams," where particles loop around in a specific way before decaying. While this worked okay for one particle, it was strongly disfavored for the other and didn't explain the whole picture well.
- The "Molecule" Theory: The winning explanation involved a K-matrix model. This model treats the decay as if the Ds+ and a pion are interacting with a hidden "bound state" (a molecule) that sits right at the edge of the energy threshold (the DK threshold). This model successfully described the weird patterns in the Ds1(2460)+ data and the smoother patterns in the Ds1(2536)+ data simultaneously.
The data strongly suggests that the Ds1(2460)+ has a significant "molecular" nature, while the Ds1(2536)+ is more like a conventional particle.
New Measurements and Limits
Beyond the big picture, the paper also delivered some precise numbers:
- First-Ever Measurement: They measured the branching fraction (the probability) of the Ds1(2536)+ decaying into Ds+ π+ π− for the first time. They found it happens about 1.57% of the time (specifically, 1.57 ± 0.08 ± 0.09 ± 0.17%).
- Masses: They refined the masses of both particles. The Ds1(2460)+ weighs 2459.51 ± 0.14 ± 0.13 ± 0.15 MeV, and the Ds1(2536)+ weighs 2535.18 ± 0.04 ± 0.05 ± 0.16 MeV.
- Width Limit: They set a new, tighter limit on how "wide" (how quickly it decays) the Ds1(2460)+ is. They found its width is less than 1.38 MeV with 95% confidence. This is a significant improvement over the previous limit of 3.5 MeV.
The Takeaway
This paper doesn't just add a number to a list; it changes how we see the family tree of these particles. By showing that two seemingly identical particles dance to different tunes, the LHCb team provides strong evidence that the Ds1(2460)+ is likely a D*K molecular state—a temporary, exotic molecule of quarks—while its cousin is something else entirely. It's a vivid reminder that in the quantum world, looks can be very, very deceiving.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.