← Latest papers
🔭 astrophysics

Towards Genuine Coexistence: Per-Satellite Emission and Radiation Limits to Protect Radio Astronomy and Geodetic VLBI at 1-14 GHz from Satellite Constellations

This paper analyzes the interference from current and future non-geostationary satellite constellations on geodetic VLBI and radio astronomy across 1–14 GHz, revealing that existing spurious emissions—particularly the second harmonic of 2620 MHz downlinks—already cause significant data loss and establishing maximum tolerable per-satellite emission limits to ensure genuine coexistence.

Original authors: Balthasar Indermuehle, Lucia McCallum, Emma van der Wateren, Hayo Hase, Benjamin Winkel, Liroy Lourenco, Federico Di Vruno, Michael Lindqvist, Gregory Hellbourg, Gyula Jozsa

Published 2026-08-13
📖 3 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Balthasar Indermuehle, Lucia McCallum, Emma van der Wateren, Hayo Hase, Benjamin Winkel, Liroy Lourenco, Federico Di Vruno, Michael Lindqvist, Gregory Hellbourg, Gyula Jozsa

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the universe as a giant, silent library where the books are written in radio waves instead of ink. For decades, scientists have been the quiet librarians, listening to the faint whispers of distant stars, black holes, and the very birth of our cosmos. To hear these whispers, they use massive radio telescopes—giant metal ears that are incredibly sensitive. The problem is, the library is getting crowded. Just as you might try to hear a pin drop in a room while a rock concert is playing next door, these astronomers are trying to listen to the universe while thousands of new, noisy satellites zoom overhead. These satellites are part of "constellations," huge swarms of machines designed to beam internet down to Earth. While they are great for sending memes and videos, their electronic hums and accidental radio leaks are drowning out the cosmic signals. The question isn't just about annoying the astronomers; it's about whether we can still measure the Earth's wobble and orientation with the precision needed for GPS, aviation, and even keeping our global clocks in sync.

This paper is a loud alarm bell ringing for those quiet librarians. The authors, a team of radio astronomers and geodesists, decided to stop guessing how much noise these satellites make and actually go out and measure it. They used a powerful telescope in Australia to track real satellites, listening to their "intended" signals (the internet beaming down), their "unwanted" signals (radio static and harmonics that leak out like a bad radio station), and their "unintended" radiation (electronic noise from the satellites' brains and power supplies). They found that right now, with about 12,000 active satellites, the noise is already so loud that it breaks the rules for protecting radio astronomy in two key frequency bands. But the real shocker is what happens when we look to the future. The authors ran computer simulations to see what would happen if the sky fills up with the hundreds of thousands of satellites that companies have planned to launch. Their models show that by the time we reach 300,000 satellites, the noise from specific broadband harmonics could wipe out up to 68% of the data for certain types of Earth-measuring science called "geodetic VLBI," while other types of satellite noise remain below the critical threshold.

The paper doesn't just say "it's bad"; it does the math to tell us exactly how bad it is and what needs to change. They calculated a "noise ceiling"—a strict limit on how much radio noise each individual satellite is allowed to emit if we want to keep the universe audible. They found that current satellites are already way too loud, exceeding these safe limits by huge margins (sometimes 20 to 70 decibels, which is like shouting when you should be whispering). The authors argue that this isn't a problem of running out of space or frequency; it's an engineering problem. They show that satellites can be built to be much quieter, using technology that is already standard in the aerospace industry to protect the satellites' own internal electronics. The paper concludes that if we don't demand these stricter limits now, the next generation of satellites will effectively blind our radio telescopes and scramble our ability to measure the Earth's rotation, turning our cosmic library into a chaotic, noisy mess where the stars can no longer speak.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →