Impact of perturbative tensor interactions on the spontaneous fission half-lives of superheavy nuclei
This study demonstrates that incorporating a perturbative tensor term into the Gogny-D1S force significantly reduces the first fission barrier height in superheavy nuclei, thereby decreasing theoretical spontaneous fission half-lives and improving their agreement with experimental data.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Imagine the atomic nucleus as a tiny, wobbly drop of liquid, held together by a sticky force that fights against the electric repulsion trying to blow it apart. For heavy atoms, this balance is so delicate that they can spontaneously split in two, a process called nuclear fission. It's like a stretched rubber band that suddenly snaps; the energy released is immense. But for the heaviest, most unstable elements we can create in a lab—superheavy nuclei—this snapping happens so fast that they vanish almost instantly. Scientists have been trying to predict exactly how long these atomic giants last before they split. To do this, they use complex computer models that map out the "energy landscape" of the nucleus. Think of this landscape as a mountain range where the nucleus sits in a valley (its stable state) and must climb over a mountain peak (the fission barrier) to fall apart. The higher the mountain, the longer the nucleus survives.
Recently, physicists have been refining the rules of this game. They know that inside the nucleus, protons and neutrons interact in complicated ways, and one specific type of interaction, called the "tensor force," has been a bit of a mystery. It's like a subtle magnetic tug between the particles that depends on how they are oriented. While standard models have mostly ignored this tug, new theories suggest it might be the missing piece of the puzzle. The big question is: Does adding this tiny, subtle force change the height of the mountain peaks enough to explain why some superheavy atoms live longer or shorter than our current models predict?
This paper takes a deep dive into that question by running detailed simulations on a series of superheavy nuclei, ranging from Nobelium to Darmstadtium. The researchers compared two versions of their nuclear model: the standard version (called D1S) and a new version that includes the perturbative tensor term (called D1ST). They found that adding this tensor force doesn't change the "glue" holding the nucleus together (pairing properties) or the weight of the nucleus as it moves (collective inertia). However, it does something dramatic to the mountain itself: it lowers the height of the first mountain peak (the inner fission barrier) significantly.
Because the mountain is lower, the nucleus can "tunnel" through it much more easily, just as a ball would roll down a shorter hill faster than a taller one. The results show that when the tensor force is included, the predicted lifetimes of these superheavy nuclei become much shorter. In fact, for many of the elements studied, the new predictions with the tensor term match experimental data much better than the old models did. For example, for the nucleus Rutherfordium-260, the standard model predicted a lifetime that was too long, but the new model with the tensor term predicted a lifetime of about seconds, which is very close to the experimental value of seconds. The paper concludes that this tensor interaction is a crucial ingredient for accurately describing how these heavy atoms fall apart, and the authors plan to use this improved understanding to study even heavier elements in the future.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.