← Latest papers
💻 computer science

Euclidean SVP is deterministically NP-hard to approximate within any constant factor

This paper establishes that the Euclidean Shortest Vector Problem is deterministically NP-hard to approximate within any constant factor, thereby extending previous deterministic hardness results to arbitrary constants and providing deterministic counterparts to Khot's randomized theorem and the dimension-dependent regimes of Haviv and Regev.

Original authors: Daqing Wan

Published 2026-08-14
📖 3 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Daqing Wan

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine you are a master locksmith trying to crack a safe, but the safe is made of a strange, invisible material that exists in hundreds of dimensions at once. This is the world of lattices, which are essentially infinite grids of points stretching out in every direction. In the real world, we use these grids to build the locks that protect our digital secrets, like your passwords and bank accounts. The security of these locks relies on a single, stubborn question: What is the shortest path from the center of the grid to the nearest point?

Finding this shortest path is called the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP). It's easy to do if you only need to be roughly close, but finding the exact shortest path is notoriously difficult. In fact, mathematicians have long suspected that as the grid gets bigger, finding the answer becomes so hard that no computer, no matter how powerful, could solve it in a reasonable amount of time. This isn't just a math puzzle; if we could easily solve it, the digital locks protecting the internet would crumble. For years, scientists knew the problem was hard, but they couldn't prove it was hard without relying on a little bit of luck (randomness) in their calculations. They needed a proof that worked every single time, like a perfectly engineered machine, rather than a lucky guess.

This paper is the story of how a researcher named Daqing Wan finally built that perfect machine. The author proves that for any fixed level of difficulty you can imagine, finding the shortest path in these grids is indeed impossible for standard computers to solve quickly, and this proof works deterministically—meaning it never needs to roll dice or guess. The paper achieves this by combining two clever tricks: first, creating a "trap" using a special type of code that forces the shortest path to be a simple, binary choice (like a light switch being on or off); and second, using a mathematical "magnifying glass" called a tensor product to blow up that simple trap into a massive, unsolvable maze.

Here is the magic of the magnifying glass: usually, when you combine two complex grids, the shortest path in the new, bigger grid isn't just the combination of the shortest paths from the original ones. It's messy and unpredictable. But Wan discovered a special rule for a specific type of measurement (called the 1\ell_1 norm) where the lengths do multiply perfectly. By forcing the problem into this specific measurement first, and then blowing it up, the author shows that if you could solve the easy version, you could solve the impossible version. Since the impossible version is known to be too hard for computers, the easy version must be too, proving that the whole system is secure.

The result is a major upgrade to our understanding of digital security. It confirms that even if an attacker tries to find a "good enough" answer (within any constant factor) rather than the perfect one, they are still stuck. The paper also shows that this hardness isn't just a one-time thing; by making the "magnifying glass" bigger and bigger, the problem becomes harder and harder, reaching levels of difficulty that would take longer than the age of the universe to solve. This work doesn't just say the problem is hard; it builds a deterministic, step-by-step proof that leaves no room for doubt, solidifying the foundation of the cryptography that keeps our digital lives safe.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →