Crudely Estimated Maximum Mass for a Cosmological Black Hole
Based on -body simulations showing that orbital velocity increases linearly over time, this paper conjectures a crude upper mass limit of approximately for supermassive black holes in the current universe, beyond which equal-mass binaries would fail to coalesce within the age of the universe.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the vast, dark architecture of the cosmos, gravity acts as the ultimate sculptor, pulling matter together to form stars, galaxies, and the most extreme objects known: black holes. These are regions of space so dense that nothing, not even light, can escape their pull. When two galaxies collide, their central black holes often find themselves locked in a slow, cosmic waltz, orbiting one another. For decades, astronomers have understood that as these pairs spiral inward, they should eventually crash together, releasing a tremendous burst of ripples in space-time called gravitational waves. However, a persistent puzzle has lingered: simulations suggest that for the most massive black hole pairs, the forces that usually drive them together—like the friction of surrounding stars or gas—might not be strong enough to push them close enough for the final, explosive merger to happen within the current age of the universe. If this is true, there must be a limit to how large a black hole can grow by merging with another before the universe simply runs out of time.
A recent study by theoretical physicist Don N. Page at the University of Alberta tackles this question by looking at the slow, steady drift of black hole pairs before they begin to emit significant gravitational waves. The research builds on earlier computer simulations that tracked how stars in the centers of galaxies interact with orbiting black hole pairs. These simulations showed that the gravitational tug of nearby stars causes the black holes to lose energy and move closer together at a rate that is surprisingly steady, regardless of how massive the black holes are. This process is slow, taking hundreds of billions of years to bring the pair close enough for the final plunge, a timescale far longer than the roughly 14 billion years the universe has existed so far. Page's work asks a simple but profound question: if we add the extra push from gravitational waves to this slow stellar drift, is there a maximum mass for a black hole that could possibly form by merging within the lifetime of our universe?
The paper suggests that there is indeed a ceiling. By combining the slow drift caused by stars with the faster inspiral caused by gravitational radiation, the author calculates that black hole binaries can only merge if their combined mass is below a certain threshold. If the pair is too heavy, the universe simply does not have enough time to bring them together. The calculations indicate that the maximum mass for a black hole formed through this sequence of mergers is approximately 140 trillion times the mass of our Sun. This figure is derived by assuming the most efficient scenario possible: a series of mergers between black holes of equal size, happening continuously since the beginning of time. Even under these ideal conditions, any black hole heavier than this limit would still be too far apart to have coalesced by today.
This finding has a direct consequence for how we listen to the universe. Astronomers use detectors to hunt for the gravitational waves emitted by these merging giants. The study predicts that the signal from these events should not get stronger as the frequency of the waves gets lower, once the waves correspond to periods longer than about 100,000 years. In other words, there is a cutoff point. Below a certain pitch, the gravitational waves from supermassive black hole binaries should stop increasing in intensity because the heaviest pairs simply never had time to merge. This provides a clear, testable prediction for future observations: if we look for signals with very long periods, we should not find the expected surge in strength from the most massive black holes, confirming that a cosmic speed limit exists for their growth.
The author is careful to note that this is a crude estimate, a rough upper bound rather than a precise measurement. It relies on specific assumptions about how black holes merge in a sequence and how the surrounding stars influence their motion. The paper does not claim to have solved the mystery of black hole formation definitively, but rather offers a plausible limit based on current understanding of physics and the age of the cosmos. It suggests that while the universe is vast and old, it is not old enough to allow the formation of black holes significantly larger than this calculated limit through the standard process of binary mergers. This work adds a crucial piece to the puzzle of cosmic evolution, defining the boundaries of what is possible for the most massive objects in existence.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.