Neutrino mass, scalar dark matter, and collider signatures in a radiative doublet-triplet model
This paper proposes a radiative neutrino mass model based on the T4-3-i-C1 topology featuring an inert doublet and scalar/fermion triplets that simultaneously explains neutrino masses (predicting one massless neutrino), provides a CP-even scalar dark matter candidate, and yields distinctive collider signatures from long-lived triplet particles.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
The universe is filled with two great mysteries that the standard model of physics cannot explain. First, there is the invisible substance known as dark matter, which holds galaxies together but refuses to reveal its true nature. Second, there are neutrinos, ghostly particles that stream through everything in the cosmos. For decades, scientists believed these neutrinos had no mass, but experiments have proven they do, however tiny that mass may be. The puzzle is that the mechanism giving them this weight is unknown, and the standard model offers no candidate for dark matter that fits the bill. Physicists have long suspected that these two mysteries might be solved by the same new physics, a hidden sector of particles that interacts with our world only very weakly.
A team of researchers has now explored a specific theoretical framework that links these two problems, proposing a universe where the mass of neutrinos is generated through a subtle, one-step quantum process involving new, unseen particles. In this model, the lightest of these new particles is stable and electrically neutral, making it a perfect candidate for the dark matter that permeates the cosmos. The scientists built a detailed map of this theory, testing it against every known law of physics and every experimental measurement available today. They found that the model works, surviving rigorous checks from particle colliders, cosmological observations, and sensitive underground detectors. Most importantly, they discovered that this single theory can explain the observed patterns of neutrino masses while simultaneously accounting for the amount of dark matter in the universe, offering a unified solution to two of the biggest questions in modern physics.
The researchers focused on a specific arrangement of new particles, imagining a world where the familiar Higgs field interacts with a new set of invisible partners. These partners include a new type of scalar particle, which is a cousin to the Higgs boson, and a new type of fermion, a heavy cousin to the neutrino. In this setup, the new particles are protected by a hidden symmetry that prevents them from decaying into ordinary matter, ensuring that the lightest one remains stable forever. This stability is crucial, as it allows the lightest particle to survive from the birth of the universe until today, forming the dark matter we observe. The model is designed so that the new particles can only interact with the known world through a very specific, loop-like process. This loop is the key to the neutrino mass: the new particles circulate in a quantum loop, effectively generating a tiny mass for the neutrinos without ever appearing as free particles in the process.
To see if this idea holds water, the team performed a massive computational scan, testing millions of possible combinations of particle masses and interaction strengths. They checked each combination against a long list of real-world constraints. They ensured the theory did not break the rules of quantum mechanics, that it produced the correct amount of dark matter observed by satellites, and that it did not conflict with precise measurements of how particles behave in accelerators. They also checked that the model did not predict rare decays of charged particles that experiments have already ruled out. The results were encouraging. The model survived all these tests, finding a "sweet spot" where the new particles could exist with masses ranging from a few tens of gigaelectronvolts up to nearly two thousand gigaelectronvolts. This range is significant because it places the new particles within reach of current and future particle colliders, meaning they are not just mathematical curiosities but potential discoveries waiting to be made.
One of the most striking findings concerns the nature of the neutrino mass itself. The model predicts that the three known types of neutrinos do not all have the same mass pattern. Instead, it suggests that one of the three neutrinos is completely massless, while the other two carry the weight. This specific arrangement, known as a rank-two mass matrix, is a direct consequence of the model's structure. The researchers found that this prediction works for two different possible orderings of the neutrino masses, though one ordering fits the data slightly better. In this preferred scenario, the model predicts that the total mass of the three neutrinos is very small, but large enough to be detected by upcoming experiments designed to weigh neutrinos directly or to observe a rare process called neutrinoless double beta decay. This provides a clear path for future experiments to confirm or rule out the theory.
The study also looked closely at how these new particles would behave if they were created in a particle collider like the Large Hadron Collider. Because the new particles are heavy and interact weakly, they would not leave a simple, immediate signal. Instead, they would likely produce a cascade of decays. The heavier new particles would decay into lighter ones, eventually producing the stable dark matter particle, which would escape the detector unseen. This process would leave behind a signature of missing energy, accompanied by jets of ordinary particles or leptons. Depending on the exact masses of the new particles, these decays could happen instantly, or they could be delayed, causing the particles to travel a measurable distance before decaying. This variety of signatures offers multiple ways for experimentalists to hunt for the theory's predictions. The researchers identified specific benchmark scenarios where the new particles would be produced in large numbers, with decay patterns that are distinct from the background noise of standard physics.
Furthermore, the team examined how this new dark matter would interact with ordinary matter in underground detectors. These detectors look for the faint recoil of an atomic nucleus when a dark matter particle bumps into it. The model predicts that the interaction between the new dark matter and nuclei is mediated by the Higgs boson. However, the researchers found that in many of the viable scenarios, the strength of this interaction is naturally suppressed. This suppression happens because of a delicate balance between the different ways the new particles mix with the Higgs field. As a result, the predicted signal is often weak enough to evade current detection limits, yet strong enough to be within reach of the next generation of detectors. This explains why we have not seen dark matter yet, even as we continue to refine our search.
The paper concludes by mapping out the future of this research. The viable regions of the model are not just theoretical possibilities; they are concrete targets for the next decade of physics. The predicted neutrino masses are within the sensitivity of upcoming experiments like KATRIN and LEGEND-1000. The predicted dark matter signals are within the reach of future direct-detection experiments. And the predicted collider signatures are within the energy reach of the High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider and potential future muon colliders. The researchers emphasize that while their work is a theoretical simulation, it provides a clear, testable roadmap. If the universe follows this path, the next generation of experiments will not only find the dark matter but also uncover the mechanism that gives neutrinos their mass, solving two of the most enduring puzzles in science with a single, elegant theory.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.