← Latest papers
⚛️ general relativity

Quasi-isotropic Asymptotic Expansions in Varying Speed of Light Cosmologies

This paper generalizes the quasi-isotropic asymptotic expansion of Einstein equations to cosmologies with varying speed of light and gravitational constant, demonstrating that the resulting solutions lack the necessary arbitrary functions to constitute general solutions for these theories.

Original authors: Dimitrios Trachilis

Published 2026-09-11
📖 4 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Dimitrios Trachilis

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The story of our universe often begins with a single, blinding moment of creation, a point where space and time were compressed into an infinitely small, infinitely hot singularity. For decades, physicists have tried to understand what happened in those first fractions of a second, relying on the standard laws of gravity and the speed of light as they exist today. However, some theories suggest that in the very early universe, the speed of light might not have been the constant, unchanging limit we measure now. Instead, it could have been much faster, perhaps even infinite, before settling into its current value. This idea, known as a varying speed of light, offers a different way to solve puzzles about why the universe looks so smooth and flat, without needing the rapid expansion known as inflation. To test these ideas, scientists look for mathematical solutions that describe how the universe behaves as it emerges from that initial singularity, checking if these new theories can produce a universe that looks like the one we see around us.

In a recent study, a researcher at the American University of the Middle East set out to test whether these varying speed of light theories could actually describe a general, realistic universe emerging from the Big Bang. The goal was to see if the mathematics of these theories allowed for enough freedom to describe the messy, uneven reality of our cosmos, or if they were too rigid. The scientist used a specific mathematical technique, originally developed to study the standard laws of gravity, to build a detailed model of the universe's birth. This model allowed the speed of light and the strength of gravity to change over time, but only in a way that depended on the passage of time, not on where you were in space. The researcher then constructed a series of approximations, starting with the simplest possible shape for the universe and adding layers of complexity to see if the math held up.

The investigation revealed a significant limitation in these theories. When the researcher tried to build a solution that could represent any possible universe, the math simply did not allow for enough variety. In a truly general solution, there should be eight independent pieces of information, or "free functions," that can be set arbitrarily to describe different possible starting conditions for the universe. These pieces determine how space curves, how matter moves, and how dense the universe is at the very beginning. However, the study found that the varying speed of light models only produced three independent pieces of information. The other five pieces of information were not free to vary; instead, they were forced by the equations to be specific, rigid functions of the first three. This means the theory is too restrictive. It cannot describe the full range of possible universes that might exist; it can only describe a very narrow, specific subset.

The findings suggest that while varying speed of light theories are mathematically consistent, they fail to provide a general solution for the birth of the universe. The equations force the universe into a specific, highly ordered state, removing the natural randomness and complexity that a general solution should allow. This result mirrors what happens in standard gravity theories when similar approximations are used, but it confirms that simply changing the speed of light does not fix the underlying mathematical rigidity. The study also showed that the specific way the speed of light and gravity change over time does not alter this outcome; the limitation is built into the structure of the theory itself. The research concludes that to fully understand the chaotic, anisotropic nature of the early universe, where space might have been stretching and twisting in different directions, these simplified models are not enough. They serve as a necessary stepping stone, but the full picture likely requires exploring more complex, chaotic dynamics that these current models cannot capture.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →