Testing Higgs-Coupled Minimal Dark Matter with Solar Neutrinos after the LZ High-Recoil Event
This paper investigates the Higgs-coupled Minimal Dark Matter interpretation of a recent LZ nuclear-recoil event and finds that, while the model successfully reproduces the terrestrial signal, the resulting high-energy solar neutrino flux from DM annihilation strongly conflicts with IceCube constraints for most thermal mass benchmarks, particularly those below 48 TeV.
Original paper dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
For decades, astronomers have known that the visible stars and galaxies in the universe are only a small fraction of what exists. The rest is an invisible substance called dark matter, which holds galaxies together through its gravity but refuses to interact with light. While we know it is there, we have never directly caught a single particle of it. One leading idea suggests that dark matter consists of heavy, slow-moving particles that occasionally bump into normal atoms. However, as detectors on Earth have become more sensitive, they have found nothing, forcing scientists to consider more complex scenarios where these particles might be harder to catch.
A recent clue appeared from the LUX-ZEPLIN experiment, a massive detector buried deep underground. The team reported seeing a single, unusual event where a nucleus in the detector received a very strong kick, far more energetic than typical background noise. This high-energy kick suggested a specific type of interaction: the dark matter particle might need to absorb a small amount of energy to change its state before it can bounce off an atom. This process, known as endothermic scattering, pushes the signal to higher energies, explaining why the detector saw such a powerful hit.
A new study takes this single event and asks a critical question: if this interpretation is correct, what should we see happening in the Sun? The researchers focused on a specific theoretical model where dark matter particles interact with the Higgs field, the same field that gives particles mass. In this model, the same force that causes the high-energy kick on Earth also pulls dark matter into the Sun. Once trapped by the Sun's immense gravity, these particles would sink to the core, collide, and eventually destroy each other, releasing a flood of high-energy neutrinos. These ghostly particles would travel to Earth, where a massive detector called IceCube, buried in the Antarctic ice, could spot them.
The researchers performed a detailed, step-by-step calculation to see if this scenario holds up. They did not simply assume the dark matter particles would behave perfectly; instead, they modeled the complex reality of the Sun's interior. They accounted for the fact that the Sun is not a solid block but a hot gas where atomic nuclei are constantly jiggling. They also considered that the dark matter particles might not start in their lowest energy state and would need to lose energy through various collisions before settling down to annihilate. By running these simulations with extreme precision, they determined exactly how many neutrinos should be arriving at Earth for each of the six proposed versions of this dark matter model.
The results were decisive. For the two lightest versions of the model, which fit the mass range of the single event seen on Earth, the predicted number of neutrinos from the Sun is thousands of times higher than what IceCube has actually observed. The detectors have seen far fewer neutrinos than this theory predicts, effectively ruling out these two versions of the model. The situation is similar for the next two heavier versions; while the gap is smaller, the predicted signal is still significantly higher than the observed limit, placing these models under severe strain.
For the heaviest versions of the model, the situation is more nuanced because they fall outside the standard range of data that IceCube has published. The researchers had to carefully estimate how the detector's sensitivity changes for such massive particles. Even with a very conservative estimate that assumes the detector becomes much less efficient at these extreme masses, the heaviest models still predict more neutrinos than are seen, though the margin is tighter. The 82 TeV benchmark is highly sensitive to these assumptions, while the 130 TeV benchmark remains below the extrapolated sensitivity, making it the only candidate that currently survives this test.
Ultimately, this work demonstrates that a single event on Earth can be tested against the entire solar system. By using the Sun as a giant trap and the Antarctic ice as a listening post, the researchers showed that the most popular explanations for the high-energy kick are likely incorrect. The study does not prove what dark matter is, but it successfully narrows the field, showing that if this specific type of interaction is responsible for the signal, the universe must be populated by much heavier particles than previously thought, or the model itself needs to be abandoned.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.