← Latest papers
🔢 mathematics

Density of large holes among power-free lattice points

This paper establishes precise asymptotic formulas for the densities of large holes and deep points within rr-free lattice points in Zd\mathbb{Z}^d, refining previous bounds and exact-gap expansions by providing explicit constants and error terms that hold uniformly across dimensions and ball norms.

Original authors: Francesco Cellarosi

Published 2026-10-02
📖 7 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Francesco Cellarosi

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

In the vast, orderly grid of the integers, there exists a hidden pattern of exclusion. Imagine a vast field of points stretching infinitely in every direction, where each point is defined by a set of whole number coordinates. Some of these points are "visible" from the center, meaning their coordinates share no common divisor other than one. Others are "invisible" because their coordinates share a common factor, such as being all even or all multiples of three. Mathematicians call the visible ones "primitive" or "power-free" points, and the invisible ones "non-power-free." For decades, researchers have studied how these invisible points cluster together. They know that if you look at a small patch of the grid, you will almost always find at least one visible point. But what happens if you look at a very large patch? Is it possible to find a massive, empty region where every single point is invisible?

This question leads to the study of "holes" in the lattice. A hole is a large, connected area where no visible points exist. The size of such a hole is measured by how far you can travel from its center in any direction before hitting a visible point. For a long time, mathematicians knew that these holes could be made arbitrarily large, but they did not know how rare they were. They could prove that a hole of a certain size exists, but they could not calculate the precise probability of finding one in a random section of the grid. The question was not just about existence, but about density: as the size of the hole grows, how quickly does the likelihood of finding one drop to zero?

A new study by Francesco Cellarosi addresses this problem with remarkable precision. The research focuses on a specific type of invisible point: those whose coordinates are all divisible by the same prime number raised to a certain power. By treating the grid as a graph where points are connected to their immediate neighbors, the author identifies the "deep" points—the centers of these massive invisible regions. The study calculates the exact rate at which the density of these deep points decreases as the size of the hole increases. The result is a detailed formula that describes this drop-off, revealing that the probability of finding such a hole is not just small, but follows a very specific, predictable curve involving logarithms and powers.

The paper does more than just count these holes; it distinguishes between different ways of measuring their size. The author considers holes shaped like spheres, cubes, and diamonds, showing that while the shape changes the specific numbers in the formula, the fundamental behavior remains the same. The study also refines previous work by other mathematicians who had established that these holes exist and provided rough upper limits on their frequency. Cellarosi's work sharpens these limits, providing a much more accurate picture of the landscape. The findings show that the density of these large holes is governed by a complex interplay between the size of the grid, the power of the prime numbers involved, and the geometry of the region being examined.

One of the most significant aspects of this research is its application to one-dimensional number lines, which corresponds to the study of integers rather than multi-dimensional grids. In this simpler case, the problem translates to finding long sequences of consecutive integers that are all "non-power-free." For example, finding a run of numbers where none of them are "square-free" (meaning each is divisible by a square number like 4, 9, or 16). The study provides a precise formula for the density of such runs as they get longer. This improves upon earlier estimates by other researchers, offering a clearer understanding of how these gaps behave as they stretch out. The author proves that the probability of finding a gap of a specific length follows a specific mathematical pattern, correcting and refining earlier approximations that were less precise.

The methodology relies on a clever combination of number theory and probability. The author constructs a "random covering model," a theoretical framework where the invisible points are generated by a random process that mimics the actual distribution of numbers. By analyzing this random model, the author can calculate the probability of a large hole appearing. The proof involves carefully counting how many points in a large region can be covered by the "shadows" of small prime numbers and then determining how many large prime numbers are needed to cover the remaining points. This process allows the author to derive the exact asymptotic form of the density, which describes the behavior of the system as the hole size approaches infinity.

The results are uniform across different dimensions, meaning the same underlying logic applies whether the grid is a line, a plane, or a higher-dimensional space. The study also explores what happens when the dimension of the grid grows alongside the size of the hole, a scenario that was previously difficult to analyze. The author shows that even in these high-dimensional settings, the density of large holes follows a predictable pattern, though the specific constants change. This suggests a deep structural consistency in how these invisible clusters form, regardless of the complexity of the space they inhabit.

In the context of the broader mathematical landscape, this work connects to the study of "visible" lattice points, which are points that can be seen from the origin without any other lattice point blocking the view. The invisible points are the ones that block the view. The existence of large holes among the invisible points means there are vast regions where the view is completely blocked. The study confirms that while these regions are rare, they are not impossible, and their frequency can be calculated with high precision. The author's work builds on earlier constructions by other mathematicians who used the Chinese Remainder Theorem to prove that such holes must exist, but goes further by quantifying exactly how often they occur.

The paper also addresses the relationship between the density of these holes and the density of the points that define them. It shows that the probability of finding a hole is related to the volume of the region and the density of the invisible points, but with a correction factor that accounts for the specific geometry of the problem. This correction factor involves constants that depend on the dimension of the grid and the power of the prime numbers. The author provides explicit formulas for these constants, allowing for precise calculations in specific cases, such as the two-dimensional plane or the one-dimensional number line.

Ultimately, the study provides a comprehensive map of the "holes" in the lattice of power-free points. It transforms a qualitative understanding of these gaps into a quantitative science, offering a formula that predicts their frequency with high accuracy. The work does not just confirm that these holes exist; it tells us exactly how rare they are and how their rarity changes as they grow larger. This level of detail is a significant step forward in the field, providing a solid foundation for future research into the distribution of numbers and the geometry of lattices. The findings are rigorous and proven, offering a definitive answer to a question that had previously only been partially understood.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →