The Principle of Minimum Justified Correlation
This paper establishes that Shannon entropy, Fisher information, and quantum kinetic energy are all measures of correlation that increase under a fundamental map to independent marginals, thereby supporting a "principle of minimum justified correlation" which posits that physical systems should be described by the least correlated distributions consistent with given constraints.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the physical world, things are rarely isolated. A gas molecule bumps into its neighbor, a planet feels the pull of a distant star, and two electrons in an atom repel one another. These interactions create links, or correlations, between the parts of a system. For decades, physicists have used two different languages to describe these links. One language comes from information theory, a field that measures how much knowing the state of one thing tells you about another. The other comes from quantum mechanics, the rules that govern the behavior of the smallest particles, where energy is constantly in motion. While these fields often talk past each other, a new analysis suggests they are actually describing the same underlying reality from different angles. The core idea is simple: when two things are linked, they share information, and that link costs energy. If you could magically sever that link while keeping the individual properties of each part the same, the system would lose a specific amount of energy, and that loss is a direct measure of how strongly they were connected.
This connection between information and energy is the focus of a new paper by John H. Van Drie, a researcher from North Andover, Massachusetts. The work brings together three concepts that are usually studied separately: a measure of how much two variables depend on each other, a measure of how sharply that dependence changes across space, and the kinetic energy of a quantum system. Kinetic energy, in this context, is simply the energy of motion. The paper demonstrates that for a quantum system, the extra energy required to keep two particles correlated is exactly equal to a specific mathematical measure of how much those particles are linked. It is a precise accounting identity, not an approximation. The author shows that if you take a quantum system and mathematically remove the correlation between its parts—keeping the individual behavior of each part exactly as it was—the system's energy drops. The amount of energy lost is not random; it is a perfect match for the "Fisher information" of the correlation, a concept that describes how rapidly the relationship between the particles varies from one point in space to another.
The study begins with a thought experiment involving a fundamental transformation. Imagine you have a detailed map showing the joint behavior of two variables, such as the positions of two particles. This map shows not just where each particle is likely to be, but how their locations are tied together. The researcher applies a simple operation to this map: he replaces the joint picture with two separate pictures, one for each particle, and multiplies them together. This new, combined picture has the exact same individual probabilities for each particle as the original, but it completely removes the link between them. In the world of information, this act of "decorrelation" always increases the total entropy, or disorder, of the system. The paper confirms that this same act, when applied to continuous distributions like those found in physics, reveals a hidden structure. The increase in entropy is exactly equal to the amount of mutual information that was removed. But the paper goes further, showing that this process also affects the energy of the system.
When the researcher applies this same correlation-removing map to a quantum wavefunction, a striking result emerges. The kinetic energy of the system decreases. The paper proves that the difference between the energy of the original, correlated system and the new, uncorrelated system is directly proportional to the relative Fisher information. This is a measure of how "sharp" or concentrated the correlation is in space. If the particles are linked in a way that changes rapidly over small distances, the Fisher information is high, and the energy cost of maintaining that link is high. If the link is smooth and broad, the cost is lower. The author shows that this relationship holds true even when the wavefunction is complex, involving phases and signs, provided the comparison is made correctly. The energy lost by removing the correlation is exactly the energy stored in the spatial structure of that correlation.
This finding supports a principle the author calls the "principle of minimum justified correlation." In the language of information theory, developed by the late physicist E. T. Jaynes, the best guess for a system's state, given only certain constraints, is the one with the maximum entropy. The paper argues that this is equivalent to saying the system should have the least amount of correlation that is strictly required by the physical laws or constraints at hand. If a physical law, such as the Pauli exclusion principle for electrons, demands that two particles be correlated, then that correlation must exist. But if there is no physical reason for them to be linked, the system will naturally settle into a state where they are independent. The paper suggests that nature avoids adding unnecessary links. Any correlation that exists is there because the physics of the situation demands it, and the energy of the system reflects exactly that necessity.
The author illustrates this with a concrete example involving two coupled quantum harmonic oscillators, a standard model in physics. In this system, the strength of the link between the two oscillators is controlled by a single number. The paper calculates the exact amount of entropy gained and energy lost when the link is removed. The results show that for weak links, the energy loss is proportional to the square of the link strength, while for very strong links, the energy loss grows much faster. This confirms that the two measures of correlation—the total amount of information shared and the spatial sharpness of that sharing—are related but distinct. One tells you how much information is shared, while the other tells you how tightly packed that information is in space. The paper notes that this distinction is crucial because the energy cost is tied to the spatial sharpness, not just the total amount.
The work also clarifies the relationship between this new finding and existing ideas in quantum chemistry. In that field, "correlation energy" usually refers to the difference between the exact energy of a system and the energy calculated using a simplified model called the Hartree-Fock method. The author points out that this traditional definition is different from the one proposed here. The traditional measure includes changes in both kinetic and potential energy and is often negative, meaning the simplified model overestimates the energy. In contrast, the new measure looks only at the kinetic energy and compares the real system to a state where the particles are completely independent. This new "kinetic Fisher correlation" is always positive, representing the extra energy required to maintain the link. The paper argues that while the traditional view focuses on the total energy gap, this new view isolates the specific kinetic cost of the correlation itself.
The author is careful to state what this work does not do. It does not derive the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics from scratch, nor does it claim that all kinetic energy is simply correlation energy. The relationship is exact for the specific case of removing correlation while holding the individual particle distributions fixed. The paper also notes that for identical particles like electrons, the simple uncorrelated state used in the comparison does not respect the quantum rule that identical particles must be antisymmetric. Therefore, the comparison is a diagnostic tool to measure the kinetic structure of the dependence, rather than a proposal for a new physical wavefunction. The work is presented as a first part of a larger investigation, with a second paper planned to address more complex questions, such as how these ideas apply to time-dependent systems, the role of particle spin, and how to generate the Schrödinger equation itself from these principles.
Ultimately, the paper offers a unified way of seeing the physical world. It suggests that the energy we see in a quantum system is not just a random property but a direct reflection of the information structure holding the system together. When we look at a system and see particles moving with a certain amount of kinetic energy, we are seeing the cost of the links between them. If those links are removed, the energy drops, and the system becomes more disordered in terms of information. The principle of minimum justified correlation provides a clear rule for understanding why systems behave the way they do: they carry only as much correlation as the physical constraints force them to carry. This perspective bridges the gap between the abstract world of information and the tangible world of energy, showing that in the quantum realm, to know is to pay.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.