← Latest papers
⚛️ quantum physics

Benchmarking exchange-only control of a 48-spin singlet manifold

This paper demonstrates that by utilizing the full Hilbert space of a 48-spin singlet manifold rather than restricting operations to encoded qubits, researchers achieved a record-low system-level error rate of 3×10−43 \times 10^{-4} per exchange interaction, revealing rich scrambling dynamics and establishing a new benchmark for exchange-only quantum computing performance.

Original authors: HRL Quantum Team, Microsoft Collaborators, :, Stephen Carr, Matt Abbitt, Michael Abraham, Edwin Acuna, I. Alverado, Carter Andrews, Hussein Anton, Katherine M. Beech, Aaron J. Bluestone, Jacob Z. Blu
Published 2026-10-07
📖 6 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: HRL Quantum Team, Microsoft Collaborators, :, Stephen Carr, Matt Abbitt, Michael Abraham, Edwin Acuna, I. Alverado, Carter Andrews, Hussein Anton, Katherine M. Beech, Aaron J. Bluestone, Jacob Z. Blumoff, Matthew G. Borselli, Brydon Boyd, Jacob T. Boyer, Peter Brewer, Steven L. Brown, Joseph D. Broz, Tyler A. Cain, John B. Carpenter, Faustin W. Carter, Brittany Carter, Matthew D. Chambers, James M. Chappell, Kevin C. Chen, Edward H. Chen, Maxwell D. Choi, Matthew N. H. Chow, Justin E. Christensen, Aaron M. Chronister, Andrew M. Clapper, Michael D. Cornelius, Gregory M. Crosswhite, Stanislav Culaclii, Erik S. Daniel, Dominic Daprano, John K. David, Charles R. Elliott, Kevin Eng, Colin P. Feeney, David J. Fialkow, Dylan H. Finestone, Bryan H. Fong, Richie Fu, Zachary A. Geiger, Bradley W. Greene, Rafael Guerra-Fuentes, Hrayr K. Gurgenian, Alex Hamill, Brooke M. Hardesty, Jim W. Harrington, Alex Hirman, Donald A. Hitko, Silas Hoffman, Dominic Holloman, Daniel R. Hulbert, Jake Hundley, Clayton A. C. Jackson, Paul C. Jerger, B. Johnson, Aaron M. Jones, Michael P. Jura, Adour V. Kabakian, Tyler Keating, Joseph Kerckhoff, Andrey A. Kiselev, Patrick W. Krantz, Thaddeus D. Ladd, Sanaaya Lakdawala, Elias Lawson-Fox, Alwina R. Liu, Dwight Luhman, Manny Macias, Theodore K. Macioce, Ryan M. Martin, Daniel S. Matic, Gavin C. Mazur, Ryan McGeehan, Olivia Means, Austin Meyer, Samuel Mumford, Tina Niknejad, Riley P. O'Neil, Andrew Pan, Winston Pouse, Eric M. Prophet, Matthew D. Reed, Marcus Rentie, Alec Roberson, Zechariah Rogers, Golam Sabbir, Spencer Sager, Christopher D. Sanborn, Jonathan Sanchez, Rachel H. Sarmiento, Christian J. Schnaible, Cole Scott, Aaron Smith, Daniel E. Smith, James Soash, Kevin C. Staley, Andrea Su, Bo Sun, Christopher M. Swank, Noah Swimmer, Charles Tahan, Bryan J. Thomas, Yessica Torres, Alan Tran, Ivan Tran, James R. van Meter, Franklin Vartanian, John Samuel Venker, Daniel Volya, Annette L. Wagner, Daniel R. Ward, Aaron J. Weinstein, Abigail L. Wessels, Thomas V. Westrick, Evan T. White, Randall M. White, Parker Williams, Catrina E. Wilson, Courtney P. Wilt, Matthew Wingert, Clifford S. YoungSciortino, Andrew Ziegler

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

In the quest to build a machine that can solve problems beyond the reach of today's computers, scientists are exploring many different ways to store and process information. One promising approach relies on the tiny magnetic spins of electrons, which can act like microscopic compass needles pointing up or down. In most designs, researchers try to control each electron individually, treating it as a separate unit of information. However, a different strategy uses the natural tendency of these electrons to swap places with their neighbors, a process driven by a fundamental force called the exchange interaction. This method offers a path to high precision because the interaction is simple and robust, but it comes with a catch: the electrons cannot be controlled one by one. Instead, they must be grouped together into larger clusters that behave as a single, unified system. This creates a vast, complex landscape of possible states, far larger than what is available when controlling individual units, but it also makes the system harder to navigate and measure.

A team of researchers from HRL Quantum and Microsoft has now taken a major step forward in mastering this approach. They built a device containing 48 electron spins and demonstrated that they could manipulate this entire group with remarkable precision, treating the whole collection as a single, massive quantum processor. Rather than trying to isolate small groups of three spins to act as standard bits, the team operated the full array in a state where the total magnetic spin of the entire group is zero. This specific configuration allows them to access a space of possibilities that is larger than what 40 standard bits could hold, yet they managed to control it without the usual errors that plague such large systems. Their work shows that by embracing the complexity of the whole system rather than fighting it, they can achieve a level of accuracy that surpasses other leading quantum technologies.

The researchers tested their system using a series of rigorous experiments designed to measure how well the machine preserves information as it performs complex operations. They began by running random sequences of spin-swapping interactions, essentially asking the electrons to shuffle their connections in unpredictable ways. To see if the machine was working correctly, they measured how often the system returned to its starting state after these shuffles. They found that for every single swap operation performed, the chance of the system making an error was incredibly small, roughly 3 in 10,000. This error rate is significantly lower than what has been reported for other types of quantum computers, which typically show error rates above 1 in 1,000 for their basic operations. This result is particularly impressive because it accounts for all the noise and imperfections in the entire control sequence, not just the theoretical performance of a single component.

To understand how information spreads through this massive group of electrons, the team performed a more advanced test known as an out-of-time-order correlator. In this experiment, they introduced a small disturbance to one part of the system and then watched how that disturbance rippled through the entire group of 48 spins. They observed that the information did not stay put; instead, it scrambled and spread out across the device in a wave-like pattern. By measuring the state of specific pairs of electrons at the end of the process, they could see exactly how the initial disturbance had affected the rest of the system. The results matched computer simulations of a perfect, noise-free machine with striking accuracy, confirming that the electrons were interacting exactly as the laws of physics predicted, even in such a large and complex arrangement.

The team also explored how the system behaves when simulating a specific type of magnetic material, known as a Heisenberg spin chain. They programmed the electrons to mimic the interactions found in this material, adjusting the strength of the connections between neighbors to see how the system responded. They observed clear patterns of waves traveling back and forth through the chain, reflecting off the ends and interfering with one another. These patterns changed in predictable ways depending on the settings they chose, demonstrating that the device could faithfully reproduce the dynamics of complex physical models. While the system is not yet large enough to solve problems that are impossible for classical computers, the ability to simulate these magnetic interactions with such high fidelity suggests that the technology is maturing rapidly.

One of the most significant aspects of this work is the method used to measure success. Instead of looking at the performance of individual gates or small groups of spins, the researchers evaluated the entire system as a whole. They treated the 48 spins not as a collection of separate bits, but as a single, interconnected entity. This approach allowed them to utilize the full range of states available to the system, including those that are usually considered errors or "leakage" in other designs. By doing so, they were able to extract a much more accurate picture of the machine's true capabilities. The data revealed that the errors in the system are not just random glitches but include consistent, predictable patterns that can be modeled and understood. This insight is crucial for future improvements, as it points the way toward better control hardware and calibration techniques.

The researchers acknowledge that while their device performs exceptionally well, it is not yet a fully fault-tolerant computer capable of running any algorithm without error. The error rate they measured, while low, would still accumulate over very long calculations, eventually overwhelming the results. However, the fact that they achieved such low errors on a system of this size is a strong indicator that the exchange-only approach is viable. It suggests that with further refinements in the control electronics and the way pulses are delivered to the spins, the error rates could be reduced even further. The team's work provides a clear roadmap for how to scale up these systems, showing that the challenges of controlling large groups of electrons are not insurmountable.

In the broader context of quantum computing, this study offers a compelling alternative to the dominant strategies that rely on controlling individual qubits. It demonstrates that there is value in working with the collective behavior of many particles, even if it means giving up the ability to address them individually. The high fidelity achieved in this experiment suggests that the exchange interaction is a powerful tool for building quantum machines. As the field moves forward, the lessons learned from this 48-spin system will likely influence how future devices are designed and tested. The ability to access and control such a large Hilbert space with high precision opens up new possibilities for simulating complex materials and solving difficult problems, bringing the vision of a practical quantum computer one step closer to reality.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →