← Latest papers
🔬 physics

Measurements of transverse kinematic imbalance in muon neutrino charged-current interactions on argon with a single proton and no pions in the final state with SBND

Using 8.8×10¹⁹ protons-on-target from Run 1, the Short-Baseline Near Detector (SBND) collaboration presents the first neutrino-argon cross-section measurement for charged-current interactions with a single proton and no pions, revealing significant discrepancies between experimental data and current event-generator predictions in transverse kinematic imbalance variables.

Original authors: R. Acciarri, L. Aliaga-Soplin, D. Andrade Aldana, C. Andreopoulos, A. Antonakis, S. Balasubramanian, A. Barnard, V. Basque, J. R. Bateman, A. Beever, B. Behera, M. Betancourt, A. Bhat, M. Bishai, A. B
Published 2026-10-30
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: R. Acciarri, L. Aliaga-Soplin, D. Andrade Aldana, C. Andreopoulos, A. Antonakis, S. Balasubramanian, A. Barnard, V. Basque, J. R. Bateman, A. Beever, B. Behera, M. Betancourt, A. Bhat, M. Bishai, A. Blake, B. Bogart, D. Brailsford, A. Brandt, S. Brickner, M. B. Brunetti, G. A. N. Buzzard, L. Camilleri, D. Caratelli, D. Carber, B. Carlson, M. F. Carneiro, R. Castillo Fernandez, F. Cavanna, A. Chappell, H. Chen, S. Chung, R. Coackley, J. I. Crespo-Anadón, C. Cuesta, Y. Dabburi, O. Dalager, M. Dall'Olio, S. K. Das, M. Del Tutto, Z. Djurcic, V. do Lago Pimentel, S. Dominguez-Vidales, M. Donnachie, M. Dubnowski, K. Duffy, S. Dytman, A. Ereditato, E. Espinoza, J. J. Evans, A. C. Ezeribe, C. Fan, A. Filkins, B. Fleming, W. Foreman, D. Franco, G. Fricano, I. Furic, A. P. Furmanski, S. Gao, D. Garcia-Gamez, S. Gardiner, I. Gil-Botella, S. Gollapinni, P. Green, W. C. Griffith, L. Hagaman, P. Hamilton, B. Harris, A. Hergenhan, M. Hernandez-Morquecho, C. James, R. S. Jones, M. Jung, T. Junk, D. Kalra, G. Karagiorgi, F. Kumar, L. Kashur, K. J. Kelly, W. Ketchum, M. J. King, J. Klein, L. Kotsiopoulou, I. Kreslo, T. Kroupová, V. A. Kudryavtsev, H. Lay, R. LaZur, J. -Y. Li, K. Lin, B. R. Littlejohn, L. Liu, D. Lorca, W. C. Louis, X. Luo, A. A. Machado, P. Machado, C. Mariani, F. Marinho, J. Marshall, C. Martin-Morales, A. Mastbaum, K. Mavrokoridis, N. McConkey, B. McCusker, J. Mclaughlin, T. Mettler, M. Mooney, A. F. Moor, G. Moreno-Granados, C. A. Moura, J. Mueller, S. Mulleriababu, A. Navrer-Agasson, M. Nebot-Guinot, V. C. L. Nguyen, F. Nicolás-Arnaldos, J. Nowak, S. B. Oh, N. Oza, O. Palamara, N. Pallat, V. Pandey, A. Papadopoulou, H. B. Parkinson, J. Paton, L. Paulucci, Z. Pavlovic, D. Payne, L. Pelegrina-Gutiérrez, O. L. G. Peres, J. Plows, G. Putnam, X. Qian, Y. Qie, R. Rajagopalan, P. Ratoff, H. Ray, M. Reggiani-Guzzo, M. Roda, J. Romeo-Araujo, M. Ross-Lonergan, N. Rowe, P. Roy, A. Sanchez-Castillo, D. W. Schmitz, A. Schneider, A. Schukraft, H. Scott, E. Segreto, M. Shaevitz, K. Shiba, P. Singh, B. Slater, J. Smith, M. Soares-Nunes, M. Soderberg, S. Söldner-Rembold, J. Spitz, M. Stancari, T. Strauss, A. M. Szelc, P. Sanchez-Lucas, C. Thorpe, D. Totani, M. Toups, C. Touramanis, L. Tung, G. A. Valdiviesso, R. Van de Water, A. Vázquez-Ramos, L. Wan, M. Weber, H. Wei, T. Wester, A. J. White, A. Wilkinson, P. Wilson, T. Wongjirad, E. Worcester, M. Worcester, S. Yadav, E. Yandel, L. Yates, S. Yebes, B. Yu, H. Yu, J. Yu, B. Zamorano, J. Zennamo, C. Zhang

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Neutrinos are ghostly particles that zip through the universe almost entirely unnoticed, passing through stars, planets, and even our own bodies without leaving a trace. To study them, scientists build massive detectors deep underground or inside large tanks of liquid, waiting for the rare moment when a neutrino actually strikes an atom. When this collision happens, it creates a spray of new particles that the detector can see. However, understanding exactly what happens in that split-second collision is incredibly difficult. The neutrino is hitting the nucleus of an atom, a dense cluster of protons and neutrons that behaves like a complex, crowded room rather than a simple, isolated target. The particles inside this nucleus are constantly moving and interacting with one another, which scrambles the energy and direction of the particles flying out after the crash. Because these nuclear effects are so hard to predict, they create a fog of uncertainty that makes it difficult for physicists to measure the fundamental properties of the neutrino itself, such as how it changes identity as it travels.

A team of researchers using the Short-Baseline Near Detector at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory has taken a sharp new look at these collisions. They focused on a specific type of interaction where a muon neutrino hits an argon atom and produces exactly one muon and one proton, with no other particles like pions created in the process. By analyzing data from 8.8 × 10^19 protons hitting their target, they identified 12,804 of these clean collision events. The researchers did not just look at the speed of the outgoing particles; instead, they measured the "transverse kinematic imbalance." This is a way of checking if the sideways momentum of the particles coming out of the collision adds up correctly. If the neutrino hit a single, stationary proton, the math would be simple and the sideways momentum would balance perfectly. But because the proton was actually moving inside the argon nucleus and bumping into other particles, the balance is often off. By measuring exactly how much the momentum is missing and in which direction it is missing, the team created a detailed map of the nuclear chaos.

The results of this measurement are striking because they reveal that our current computer models of these collisions are incomplete. The researchers compared their real-world data against three different leading computer simulations used by physicists around the world. None of these models could perfectly describe all the different ways the momentum was unbalanced. The biggest gap between the models and reality appeared in the measurement of the missing sideways momentum. While some models got close in certain areas, they consistently failed to predict the full picture, often underestimating the number of events in the middle range of momentum and overestimating the number of events at the high end. This suggests that the way these models treat the movement of particles inside the nucleus, or how they handle the aftermath of the collision, needs significant adjustment.

This work is not just about correcting a few numbers; it is about building a better foundation for the next generation of neutrino experiments. The researchers found that while some models could describe the angles of the outgoing particles reasonably well, they all struggled with the momentum balance. This indicates that the problem lies specifically in how the models simulate the nuclear ground state and the final interactions of the particles as they escape the nucleus. The team's high-purity selection of events, which ensured that 91% of their data came from the specific collision type they were studying, allowed them to make these distinctions with a precision that was previously impossible. Their findings set a new benchmark, showing that current theories do not yet fully capture the complexity of how neutrinos interact with argon. As future experiments prepare to study neutrinos with even greater sensitivity, this new data provides the necessary reality check to ensure that the models used to interpret them are accurate, helping to clear the fog that has long obscured our view of these elusive particles.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →