← Latest papers
⚛️ high-energy experiments

Multimuon Events from Cosmic Rays with the ALICE Detector

This paper analyzes 62.5 days of cosmic ray data collected by the ALICE experiment between 2015 and 2018 to study multimuon events, finding that while current hadronic interaction models struggle to fully describe the data, the QGSJET-II-04 model best reproduces the observed muon multiplicity distribution and high-multiplicity event rates under the assumption of a pure iron primary composition.

Original author: Mario Sitta, for the ALICE Collaboration

Published 2026-11-04
📖 4 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original author: Mario Sitta, for the ALICE Collaboration

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the author. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

High above the Earth, a constant rain of invisible particles falls from the edge of the universe. These are cosmic rays, mostly atomic nuclei traveling at nearly the speed of light, that strike the atmosphere and collide with air molecules. When they hit, they shatter into a cascade of secondary particles, creating a shower that spreads out across the sky. Among these fragments are muons, unstable cousins of the electron that can travel deep underground before decaying. Scientists have long used these muons as messengers to understand the nature of the original cosmic rays and the violent physics that occurs when they hit the atmosphere. However, a persistent mystery has lingered: the standard models used to predict how these showers develop often fail to explain the rare, massive bursts of muons that arrive together in large groups. Understanding these events is crucial because they reveal whether our current theories of particle physics are complete or if something fundamental is missing from our picture of the universe.

At the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland, the ALICE experiment is primarily designed to smash heavy ions together to recreate the conditions of the early universe. Yet, between 2015 and 2018, while the collider was not running, the detector sat quietly underground, acting as a giant net for cosmic rays. Buried 52 meters beneath the surface, the experiment is shielded by tons of rock that block out almost all other particles, allowing only the most energetic muons to reach the sensitive tracking chambers inside. During this period, the team collected data for 62.5 days of real observation time. They focused specifically on "multimuon events," which are rare moments when more than four muons arrive at the detector simultaneously. By analyzing thousands of these events, the researchers aimed to see if the existing computer models of cosmic ray showers could accurately predict how often these large groups appear and how many muons they contain.

The researchers first looked at the distribution of muon counts, examining events with between four and fifty muons. They compared their real-world measurements against three different computer simulations, each based on a different theory of how particles interact in the atmosphere. To test these theories, the simulations assumed two extreme possibilities for the composition of the incoming cosmic rays: either they are all light protons or they are all heavy iron nuclei. The results showed a clear divide. The models based on light protons consistently predicted far fewer muon groups than what the detector actually saw. However, when the simulations assumed the cosmic rays were made of heavy iron, one specific model, known as QGSJET-II-04, matched the real data remarkably well. The other two models, even when assuming heavy iron, still predicted too few muons, failing to reproduce the observed pattern. This suggests that the standard theories of particle interaction struggle to describe these showers unless the incoming cosmic rays are heavy and the interaction model is specifically tuned to handle them.

The team also investigated the most extreme events, those containing more than one hundred muons, which they termed high muon multiplicity events. In their 62.5 days of data, they recorded thirteen such events, with the largest single burst containing 287 muons. This translates to a rate of roughly one such massive event every 4.8 days. When they compared this observed rate to their simulations, the findings reinforced the earlier conclusion. The model assuming a heavy iron composition and using the QGSJET-II-04 interaction theory predicted a rate that aligned closely with the actual measurements. In contrast, the model assuming light protons predicted a rate that was far too low to match reality. The other two interaction models also fell short, with one predicting a rate so low it was statistically incompatible with the data. The estimated energy of the cosmic rays causing these massive bursts is around 100 quadrillion electron volts, an immense amount of energy concentrated in a single particle.

Ultimately, the study provides a strong indication that the cosmic rays responsible for these rare, high-multiplicity muon bursts are likely composed of heavy elements like iron, rather than light protons. While the data does not definitively prove the composition of all cosmic rays, it strongly suggests that the current standard models of particle physics require a heavy composition to correctly describe the behavior of these atmospheric showers. The success of the QGSJET-II-04 model in matching the data, while others failed, highlights that our understanding of how high-energy particles interact in the atmosphere is still evolving. The ALICE detector, sitting deep underground, has successfully captured these fleeting moments from the cosmos, offering a clear view that challenges and refines our theoretical maps of the subatomic world.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →