Pathways to improve the quality of clinical professional master’s degree theses: a retrospective analysis of double-blind review results
This retrospective analysis of 1,156 double-blind reviews for clinical professional master's theses reveals that while median scores remained stable, significant quality differentiation exists—particularly for equivalency-based students and in 2023's decline in practical value—necessitating targeted interventions in monitoring, supervision, and review processes to shift focus from formal compliance to substantive scholarly contribution.