← Latest papers
💰 quantitative finance

Privacy vs. Profit: The Impact of Google's Manifest Version 3 (MV3) Update on Ad Blocker Effectiveness

This study empirically demonstrates that Google's transition from Manifest V2 to V3 has not significantly reduced the effectiveness of popular ad blockers in blocking ads and trackers, with some instances even showing slight improvements in privacy protection.

Original authors: Karlo Lukic, Lazaros Papadopoulos

Published 2026-07-16
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Karlo Lukic, Lazaros Papadopoulos

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the internet as a giant, bustling city where every website is a shop. To keep these shops running, they often put up billboards (ads) and hire private detectives (trackers) to follow you around, noting what you look at and where you go. For years, people have used "ad blockers," which act like super-powered bodyguards. These bodyguards stand at the shop doors, checking every visitor and every package coming in, instantly stopping the billboards and kicking out the detectives before they can cause trouble.

However, the city's mayor (Google) recently decided to change the rules of the road. They introduced a new set of traffic laws called "Manifest Version 3" (MV3). The mayor claimed these new rules were to make the city safer and faster by limiting how much power these bodyguards could have. Instead of letting them run around checking every single package in real-time, the new rules forced them to use a pre-approved list of "stop signs" and limited how many signs they could carry. Many people worried this would make the bodyguards useless, leaving the billboards up and the detectives free to roam. This study is like a detective agency that decided to test the new bodyguards in the real world to see if they are actually weaker, or if they just learned to fight differently.


The Great Bodyguard Test: Do New Rules Break the Defenses?

This paper, titled "Privacy vs. Profit," dives into a heated debate: Did Google's new rules actually break the ad blockers that millions of people rely on for privacy? The researchers set up a massive, real-world experiment to find out. They didn't just guess; they built a digital simulation where they sent four different types of "bodyguards" (popular ad blockers like Adblock Plus, AdGuard, Stands, and uBlock Origin) to visit 924 different websites. They tested these bodyguards in two different uniforms: their old, powerful "MV2" suits and their new, restricted "MV3" suits. They even tested what happened when you put all four new bodyguards in the same room at once.

The Big Surprise: The Bodyguards Are Still Strong

The results were a huge relief for anyone worried about their privacy. The study found that, contrary to the fears of many, the new MV3 bodyguards are just as good at blocking ads as the old ones. In fact, when it came to stopping the "private detectives" (trackers), the new MV3 bodyguards were actually better. On average, the new versions blocked about 1.8 more trackers per website than the old versions did.

The researchers looked closely at each bodyguard to see if any of them struggled with the new rules. They found that two of the big names, AdGuard and uBlock, performed exactly the same in their new suits as they did in their old ones. However, two others actually got stronger! Adblock Plus in its new MV3 form blocked about 1.9 more trackers (a 21.5% improvement) than its old version. Even more impressive, Stands blocked about 5.2 more trackers (a 45.9% improvement) with the new rules. It seems these companies figured out clever ways to work within the new limits, turning a potential weakness into a strength.

What About Using Multiple Bodyguards?

A common worry was that if you tried to use multiple new bodyguards at the same time, they might trip over each other because the new rules limit the total number of "stop signs" they can use. The researchers tested this by having all four MV3 bodyguards work together. The result? They didn't trip over each other at all. Instead, they worked as a dream team. When combined, they blocked about 10.3 more trackers than Adblock Plus alone, and 4.4 more than AdGuard alone. The only exception was uBlock, which was already so good on its own that adding the others didn't change much. This suggests that if you want maximum privacy, stacking these new tools together is a winning strategy.

A Small Trade-off

While the bodyguards are effective, the study did notice one small downside. The new MV3 bodyguards sometimes left behind a few more "empty boxes" (visual placeholders) where ads used to be. This means the websites might look slightly less polished or have a few more blank spaces than before, but the ads themselves were successfully stopped.

The Bottom Line

The paper concludes that the fear that Google's new rules would destroy ad blockers was largely unfounded. The providers of these tools successfully adapted to the new challenges, proving that you can have a safer, faster browser without sacrificing your privacy. The new MV3 bodyguards are not just surviving; in many cases, they are thriving, keeping the billboards down and the detectives out just as effectively as ever.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →