← Latest papers
🔭 astrophysics

Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1). The average far-infrared properties of Euclid-selected star-forming galaxies

This study utilizes Herschel and SCUBA-2 data to characterize the average far-infrared properties of Euclid-selected star-forming galaxies, revealing that dust temperatures evolve with cosmic time due to heating by older stellar populations and that the Euclid catalogue accounts for over 60% of the cosmic infrared background at key wavelengths.

Original authors: Euclid Collaboration, R. Hill, A. Abghari, D. Scott, M. Bethermin, S. C. Chapman, D. L. Clements, S. Eales, A. Enia, B. Jego, A. Parmar, P. Tanouri, L. Wang, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, C. Baccigalupi
Published 2026-07-14
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Euclid Collaboration, R. Hill, A. Abghari, D. Scott, M. Bethermin, S. C. Chapman, D. L. Clements, S. Eales, A. Enia, B. Jego, A. Parmar, P. Tanouri, L. Wang, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, C. Baccigalupi, M. Baldi, A. Balestra, S. Bardelli, P. Battaglia, A. Biviano, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, S. Camera, G. Cañas-Herrera, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, J. Carretero, M. Castellano, G. Castignani, S. Cavuoti, K. C. Chambers, A. Cimatti, C. Colodro-Conde, G. Congedo, C. J. Conselice, L. Conversi, Y. Copin, A. Costille, F. Courbin, H. M. Courtois, M. Cropper, A. Da Silva, H. Degaudenzi, G. De Lucia, H. Dole, F. Dubath, X. Dupac, S. Dusini, S. Escoffier, M. Farina, F. Faustini, S. Ferriol, F. Finelli, N. Fourmanoit, M. Frailis, E. Franceschi, M. Fumana, S. Galeotta, K. George, B. Gillis, C. Giocoli, J. Gracia-Carpio, A. Grazian, F. Grupp, S. V. H. Haugan, W. Holmes, I. M. Hook, F. Hormuth, A. Hornstrup, K. Jahnke, M. Jhabvala, B. Joachimi, E. Keihänen, S. Kermiche, A. Kiessling, B. Kubik, M. Kümmel, M. Kunz, H. Kurki-Suonio, A. M. C. Le Brun, D. Le Mignant, S. Ligori, P. B. Lilje, V. Lindholm, I. Lloro, G. Mainetti, D. Maino, E. Maiorano, O. Mansutti, S. Marcin, O. Marggraf, M. Martinelli, N. Martinet, F. Marulli, R. J. Massey, E. Medinaceli, S. Mei, M. Melchior, Y. Mellier, M. Meneghetti, E. Merlin, G. Meylan, A. Mora, M. Moresco, L. Moscardini, R. Nakajima, C. Neissner, S. -M. Niemi, C. Padilla, S. Paltani, F. Pasian, K. Pedersen, W. J. Percival, V. Pettorino, S. Pires, G. Polenta, M. Poncet, L. A. Popa, L. Pozzetti, F. Raison, R. Rebolo, A. Renzi, J. Rhodes, G. Riccio, E. Romelli, M. Roncarelli, R. Saglia, Z. Sakr, D. Sapone, B. Sartoris, M. Sauvage, M. Schirmer, P. Schneider, T. Schrabback, A. Secroun, G. Seidel, S. Serrano, C. Sirignano, G. Sirri, L. Stanco, J. -L. Starck, J. Steinwagner, P. Tallada-Crespí, A. N. Taylor, H. I. Teplitz, I. Tereno, N. Tessore, S. Toft, R. Toledo-Moreo, F. Torradeflot, I. Tutusaus, L. Valenziano, J. Valiviita, T. Vassallo, G. Verdoes Kleijn, A. Veropalumbo, Y. Wang, J. Weller, A. Zacchei, G. Zamorani, F. M. Zerbi, I. A. Zinchenko, E. Zucca, V. Allevato, M. Ballardini, M. Bolzonella, E. Bozzo, C. Burigana, R. Cabanac, M. Calabrese, A. Cappi, J. A. Escartin Vigo, L. Gabarra, W. G. Hartley, M. Huertas-Company, R. Maoli, J. Martín-Fleitas, S. Matthew, N. Mauri, R. B. Metcalf, A. Pezzotta, M. Pöntinen, I. Risso, V. Scottez, M. Sereno, M. Tenti, M. Viel, M. Wiesmann, Y. Akrami, I. T. Andika, S. Anselmi, M. Archidiacono, F. Atrio-Barandela, D. Bertacca, L. Bisigello, A. Blanchard, L. Blot, H. Böhringer, M. Bonici, S. Borgani, M. L. Brown, S. Bruton, A. Calabro, B. Camacho Quevedo, F. Caro, C. S. Carvalho, T. Castro, Y. Charles, F. Cogato, S. Conseil, A. R. Cooray, O. Cucciati, S. Davini, F. De Paolis, G. Desprez, A. Díaz-Sánchez, J. J. Diaz, S. Di Domizio, J. M. Diego, P. -A. Duc, M. Y. Elkhashab, A. Finoguenov, A. Fontana, F. Fontanot, A. Franco, K. Ganga, J. García-Bellido, T. Gasparetto, V. Gautard, E. Gaztanaga, F. Giacomini, F. Gianotti, A. H. Gonzalez, G. Gozaliasl, M. Guidi, C. M. Gutierrez, A. Hall, S. Hemmati, C. Hernández-Monteagudo, H. Hildebrandt, J. Hjorth, J. J. E. Kajava, Y. Kang, V. Kansal, D. Karagiannis, K. Kiiveri, J. Kim, C. C. Kirkpatrick, S. Kruk, J. Le Graet, L. Legrand, M. Lembo, F. Lepori, G. Leroy, G. F. Lesci, J. Lesgourgues, T. I. Liaudat, A. Loureiro, J. Macias-Perez, M. Magliocchetti, E. A. Magnier, F. Mannucci, C. J. A. P. Martins, L. Maurin, C. J. R. McPartland, M. Miluzio, P. Monaco, C. Moretti, G. Morgante, K. Naidoo, A. Navarro-Alsina, S. Nesseris, D. Paoletti, F. Passalacqua, K. Paterson, L. Patrizii, A. Pisani, D. Potter, S. Quai, M. Radovich, G. Rodighiero, S. Sacquegna, M. Sahlén, D. B. Sanders, E. Sarpa, A. Schneider, D. Sciotti, E. Sellentin, L. C. Smith, J. G. Sorce, S. A. Stanford, K. Tanidis, C. Tao, G. Testera, R. Teyssier, S. Tosi, A. Troja, M. Tucci, C. Valieri, A. Venhola, D. Vergani, G. Verza, P. Vielzeuf, N. A. Walton

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the universe as a giant, bustling city. For a long time, astronomers have been using powerful telescopes like Euclid to take high-definition photos of this city's buildings (the galaxies) in visible and near-infrared light. They can see the "bricks" of the buildings—the stars—and count how many people (stars) are living there. But there's a problem: these photos miss the cozy, warm glow of the city's heating system.

That heating system is cosmic dust. It's the stuff that gets heated up by young, hot stars and glows brightly in the far-infrared, a part of the light spectrum our eyes can't see. To see this glow, we need to look through a different kind of lens, like the Herschel and SCUBA-2 telescopes. But here's the catch: the Herschel and SCUBA-2 lenses are a bit fuzzy. They can't pick out individual buildings in the Euclid photos; instead, they see a blurry, glowing soup where thousands of galaxies blend together.

So, how do you figure out how warm the soup is when you can't see the individual pots? You use a trick called "stacking." Imagine you have a million blurry photos of a crowd. You can't see one person's face, but if you line them all up perfectly and average the brightness of the pixels where the people are standing, the fuzzy noise cancels out, and a clear, average glow emerges. That's exactly what this paper did. The team took the Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1)—a list of over 2.6 million star-forming galaxies—and stacked them onto the Herschel and SCUBA-2 maps to measure their average far-infrared glow.

The Big Discovery: The Universe's "Thermostat"

The most exciting thing they found is how the temperature of this cosmic dust changes as the universe gets older.

Think of the universe as a house that is slowly cooling down after a big party. In the early days of the universe (when it was young and redshift was high, around z3z \simeq 3), the dust was very hot, around 35 K. This makes sense because the universe was full of energetic, young stars heating everything up like a roaring fire.

But as the universe aged, the team found something surprising. The dust didn't just keep getting colder and colder until it froze. Instead, it cooled down rapidly until the universe was about 6 billion years old (around redshift z1z \simeq 1), and then... it stopped. The temperature leveled off and stayed steady at about 23 K, right up to the present day.

The authors argue that this happens because the "fire" of young stars isn't the only thing heating the dust anymore. In the early universe, the dust was heated by hot, young stars in star-forming regions. But today, the dust is primarily heated by the "old guard"—the cooler, older stars that have been around for a long time. Even though these old stars are less energetic, there are so many of them that they keep the dust at a steady, warm 23 K, preventing it from freezing completely.

What They Measured vs. What They Simulated

The team didn't just guess this; they measured it. They fitted the data to a specific mathematical curve: T2+(T1T2)et/τT_2 + (T_1 - T_2) e^{-t/\tau}.

  • T1T_1 (the starting hot temperature) was measured at (79.7±7.4)(79.7 \pm 7.4) K.
  • T2T_2 (the final steady temperature) was measured at (23.2±0.1)(23.2 \pm 0.1) K.
  • τ\tau (how fast it cooled down) was measured at (1.6±0.1)(1.6 \pm 0.1) Gyr (billion years).

Here is where they argue against a popular idea. There are computer simulations (like the MAMBO simulation) that try to predict how galaxies behave. These simulations suggested that dust temperatures should keep dropping steadily as the universe gets older, never leveling off. The authors' data explicitly shows that this simulation is wrong for the current era. The real universe has a "floor" temperature that the simulations missed.

Other Cool Findings

  • Dust and Stars: The team also looked at how much dust there is compared to the stars. They found that the ratio of dust to stars increases as the universe goes from now back to about z1z \simeq 1, and then it seems to plateau or drop. This is because, in the past, galaxies were swallowing huge amounts of gas (which turns into dust), but now they are using that gas up or losing it.
  • Mass Doesn't Matter for Heat: Surprisingly, the temperature of the dust doesn't care how big the galaxy is. A tiny galaxy and a massive galaxy have dust at roughly the same temperature if they are at the same age in the universe. This means the link between how fast a galaxy is making stars and how hot its dust is depends entirely on the galaxy's mass.
  • Solving the Cosmic Puzzle: The team calculated how much of the "Cosmic Infrared Background" (the total glow of all dust in the universe) they could see. They found that the Euclid galaxies they studied account for more than 60% of the total glow at wavelengths of 250, 350, and 500 μ\mum. They haven't solved the whole puzzle yet, but they've found the biggest pieces.

What's Next?

The paper suggests that as the Euclid mission continues and gets deeper, they will be able to see even more galaxies, including fainter ones and those further back in time. This will help them see if the dust temperature really stays flat forever or if it changes in ways they can't see yet. For now, they have measured a clear, steady warmth in the universe's dust that computer models failed to predict, proving that the universe's heating system is more complex than we thought.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →