← Latest papers
🔬 physics

Synergetic capacity planning of public and private EV charging piles via city-scale multi-objective optimization

This study proposes a demand-driven, multi-objective optimization framework using the Harris Hawks Optimization algorithm to address spatiotemporal mismatches in Chongqing's EV charging infrastructure, revealing a critical need for technology-specific planning and projecting a requirement for 1.8 million charging units by 2030 to achieve a balanced 9:1 private-to-public ratio and enhanced grid resilience.

Original authors: Yiwu Hao, Hong Yuan, Nan Zhou, Minda Ma

Published 2026-05-19
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Yiwu Hao, Hong Yuan, Nan Zhou, Minda Ma

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine Chongqing, a massive, mountainous city in China, is rapidly filling up with electric cars (EVs). The city is like a giant, hungry machine that needs to be fed electricity to keep moving. But there's a problem: the city's "feeding stations" (charging piles) aren't being built in the right places or in the right numbers. Some neighborhoods are drowning in chargers, while others are starving.

This paper is essentially a master plan to fix that feeding schedule. The researchers built a sophisticated "recipe" to figure out exactly where and how many chargers Chongqing needs from 2022 all the way to 2030.

Here is the breakdown of their work using simple analogies:

1. The Problem: The "One-Size-Fits-All" Mistake

Imagine you are a chef trying to feed a crowd. In the past, you might have assumed everyone eats the same amount of food. But in reality, some people are marathon runners (big trucks), some are casual walkers (small cars), and some have different appetites depending on the weather.

  • The Reality: The researchers found that not all electric cars are the same. Some are pure electric (BEVs), some are hybrids that can run on gas too (PHEVs), and some are extended-range hybrids (EREVs).
  • The Weather Factor: Just like humans eat more soup in winter, electric cars "eat" more electricity in winter because they need to heat up the cabin and the battery works less efficiently in the cold.
  • The Discovery: Between mid-2022 and the end of 2024, the city's electricity appetite tripled. But the mix of cars changed too. While pure electric cars used to be the main eaters, hybrids and extended-range cars are now eating more than half the food. If you plan for only pure electric cars, you get the recipe wrong.

2. The Solution: A Smart GPS for Building Chargers

The researchers created a computer model that acts like a super-smart GPS for city planners. Instead of just guessing where to build chargers, this GPS looks at three things at once:

  1. Money: Don't waste cash building chargers nobody uses.
  2. The Power Grid: Don't plug too many cars in at once, or the city's power lines might trip like a blown fuse.
  3. Fairness: Make sure the poor neighborhoods and the suburbs get fed, not just the rich city center.

They used a special algorithm (called "Harris Hawks Optimization") which is like a hawk hunting for the perfect spot. It flies around the city, testing millions of different combinations of charger locations to find the one that balances cost, grid safety, and fairness perfectly.

3. What They Found: The "City Center vs. The Outskirts" Gap

When they compared the actual chargers built in Chongqing (2022–2024) with their optimized plan, the difference was stark:

  • The Real World: It was like a party where everyone crowded into the living room. The city center was packed with chargers, but the suburbs and outer counties were left in the dark. The public chargers (for taxis and people without home chargers) were especially scarce.
  • The Optimized Plan: Their new plan spread the chargers out more evenly. It kept the city center well-stocked but finally sent enough chargers to the suburbs.
  • The Score: They gave the real-world plan a "bad grade" (a score of 0.65, where lower is better in their math). Their new plan got an "A" (a score of 0.28). It was much more balanced.

4. The Crystal Ball: What Happens by 2030?

Using their model, they looked into the future. By 2030, Chongqing will need about 1.8 million charging piles.

  • The Ratio: They predict a stable ratio of 9 private chargers for every 1 public charger. This makes sense because most people will charge their cars at home (like plugging in a phone at night), while public chargers will serve those who need a quick top-up while out and about.
  • The Growth: The number of chargers will grow steadily, but the growth will slow down slightly as the market gets bigger, which is normal for any maturing industry.

5. The Takeaway for City Leaders

The paper concludes that you can't just build chargers based on a gut feeling or simple math. You need a data-driven strategy that:

  • Treats different car types differently.
  • Accounts for the weather (winter vs. summer).
  • Ensures the suburbs aren't left behind.
  • Keeps the city's power grid from getting overloaded.

In short: The researchers built a "smart blueprint" that tells Chongqing exactly how to build its charging network so that in the future, no electric car owner is left stranded, the power grid stays safe, and the city doesn't waste money building chargers in empty lots.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →