← Latest papers
🔢 mathematics

Three-color van der Waerden numbers grow super-exponentially

This paper establishes that the three-color van der Waerden number w(k;3)w(k;3) grows super-exponentially by constructing a three-coloring of integers up to 2k(logk)/42^{k (\log^* k)/4} free of monochromatic kk-term arithmetic progressions, while also providing a new lower bound that resolves a longstanding problem of Erdős and Graham regarding canonical van der Waerden numbers.

Original authors: Jacob Fox, Zach Hunter

Published 2026-06-02
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Jacob Fox, Zach Hunter

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine you have a very long line of numbered tiles, from 1 up to some huge number NN. You want to paint each tile with one of three colors (let's say Red, Blue, and Green).

The big question mathematicians have been asking for nearly a century is: How long does the line have to be before you are forced to create a "monochromatic arithmetic progression"?

An arithmetic progression is just a sequence of numbers that go up by the same amount, like 5, 10, 15, 20. If you paint 5, 10, 15, and 20 all Red, you've made a "monochromatic" (all one color) progression.

The number w(k;3)w(k; 3) is the length of the line where, no matter how cleverly you paint it, you cannot avoid creating a sequence of kk tiles in a row (with equal spacing) that are all the same color.

The Old Mystery

For a long time, mathematicians knew these numbers existed, but they didn't know how fast they grew as kk got bigger.

  • Some thought the numbers grew like a standard exponential function (like 2k2^k).
  • Others, including the famous mathematician Paul Erdős, guessed that for three or more colors, the numbers grow super-exponentially. This means they grow so fast they dwarf even the most powerful exponential functions. It's like comparing a snail to a rocket that accelerates faster than light.

Erdős offered a $500 prize to anyone who could prove this super-exponential growth for three colors.

The New Discovery

In this paper, Jacob Fox and Zach Hunter finally prove that Erdős was right.

They show that for three colors, the line of tiles needs to be astronomically long before you are forced to make a monochromatic sequence. Specifically, they prove the number is larger than 2k(logk)/42^{k(\log^* k)/4}.

To understand how big this is, imagine the "iterated logarithm" (logk\log^* k). This is a number that grows so slowly it's almost flat. Even for a number as huge as the number of atoms in the universe, logk\log^* k is only about 5.

  • The Analogy: If standard exponential growth is like a rabbit population doubling every day, this new result is like a rabbit population that doubles, then the speed of the doubling doubles, then the speed of that speed doubles, and so on, but only after you wait for a number that barely changes. The result is a number so massive it defies imagination.

How Did They Do It? (The Magic Tricks)

The authors didn't just guess; they built a "construction" (a specific way of painting the tiles) that avoids the pattern for as long as possible. They used a few clever mathematical tricks:

  1. The "Sparse Net" (Finding the Holes):
    First, they found a way to pick a huge group of numbers that are very "dense" (packed together) but somehow avoid forming arithmetic progressions. Think of it like a fishing net with very large holes. You can catch a lot of fish (numbers), but the holes are arranged so perfectly that you never catch a specific pattern of fish swimming in a straight line.

  2. The "Random Shift" (The Shuffle):
    They took two of these special groups and combined them. But instead of just stacking them, they used a "random shift." Imagine you have two decks of cards. You shuffle one deck, then slide it slightly over the other deck. This random movement breaks up any patterns that might have formed if you just stacked them neatly.

  3. The "Ladder" (Iterating the Process):
    The real magic is that they can repeat this shuffling and combining process over and over.

    • Start with a small group.
    • Shuffle and combine to get a bigger group that still avoids the pattern.
    • Do it again to get an even bigger group.
    • They can do this roughly logk\log^* k times.

Because they can repeat this process so many times, the final number of tiles they can paint without making a pattern becomes incredibly huge.

The Bonus: Solving an Old Puzzle

While proving this for three colors, they also solved a related puzzle posed by Erdős and Graham about "Canonical" van der Waerden numbers.

In this version, you aren't just looking for a sequence of one color. You are looking for a sequence that is either all one color OR all different colors (like Red, Blue, Green, Red, Blue, Green... wait, no, just all distinct colors).

  • The Result: They proved that the number of tiles needed to force this pattern is also super-huge. It grows faster than any simple power of kk. This settles a decades-old question about whether these numbers grow fast enough to be considered "super-exponential."

Summary

  • The Problem: How long is the line of numbers before you must see a straight-line pattern of the same color?
  • The Answer: For three colors, the line must be unimaginably long. It grows much faster than anyone previously proved.
  • The Method: They built a mathematical "shield" using random shuffles and layered combinations that keeps the patterns away for a record-breaking amount of time.
  • The Impact: This confirms a famous guess by Paul Erdős and closes a major chapter in the history of combinatorics.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →