X-Shooter survey of disk accretion in Upper Scorpius II. A lack of correlation between accretion rates and disk properties
This study of 127 Upper Scorpius stars with protoplanetary discs reveals a lack of correlation between mass accretion rates and disc properties, suggesting that the evolutionary links observed in younger regions fade with age due to the decoupling of inner and outer discs.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Imagine a giant cosmic nursery where baby stars are born, surrounded by swirling disks of gas and dust. These disks are the "construction sites" where planets are built. For a long time, astronomers believed these construction sites followed a predictable rule: the bigger the pile of building materials (the disk), the faster the baby star would gulp down fuel (accretion) to grow. It was like thinking a bigger construction site always meant a faster construction crew.
This new study, led by A. Empey and colleagues, decided to check if this rule still holds true for "teenage" stars in a region called Upper Scorpius. While younger star nurseries are about 1 to 3 million years old, Upper Scorpius is older, roughly 5 to 10 million years. The researchers wanted to see if the relationship between the disk size and the feeding rate had changed as the stars got older.
Here is what they found, explained simply:
The "Teenage Rebellion" of Star Disks
The team looked at 127 stars in this older region. They used a powerful telescope instrument called X-Shooter to measure how much material each star was eating (accretion) and combined this with data from the ALMA radio telescope to measure the size of the dust disks around them.
In younger star regions, there is a clear link: big disks usually mean fast feeding. But in Upper Scorpius, that link completely broke down.
- The Analogy: Imagine a classroom of 127 students. In a younger class, you might notice that students with bigger backpacks (more dust) are also the ones running the fastest (accreting faster). But in this older class, you see a chaotic mix. Some students have huge backpacks but are walking very slowly. Others have tiny backpacks but are sprinting. There is no pattern. The "big backpack = fast runner" rule has vanished.
The "Silent" Half
About half of the stars in their sample were so quiet that the team couldn't even tell if they were still eating at all. Their feeding rates were so low that they were indistinguishable from the natural "hiccups" or activity of the stars themselves.
- The Analogy: It's like trying to hear a whisper in a noisy room. For 50% of the stars, the "whisper" of them eating gas was either too quiet to hear or completely gone. This suggests that for many of these older stars, the inner part of their construction site has already been cleared out, even if the outer dust is still there.
Why the Confusion?
The researchers checked if this chaos was caused by specific groups of stars, stars with binary partners (two stars orbiting each other), or special types of disks with holes in the middle. They found that none of these factors could explain the mess. The lack of connection between the disk size and the feeding rate is a general feature of this older region.
The Big Picture
The study concludes that as these star systems age, the inner part of the disk (where the star eats) and the outer part (where the dust sits) seem to stop talking to each other. They become "decoupled."
- The Analogy: Think of a river. In a young river, the water flow (accretion) is directly tied to the size of the riverbed (disk). But in this older region, it's as if the river has split. The water flowing past the star has no obvious connection to how much mud is sitting in the riverbed further downstream. The smooth, predictable flow of the past has turned into a scattered, unpredictable pattern.
What This Means for Theory
Current theories about how stars and disks evolve (like the "viscous" theory, which assumes a smooth, slow draining of the disk) predicted that the relationship between disk size and feeding rate should get tighter and clearer as stars age. This study shows the exact opposite: the relationship gets looser and disappears.
The authors suggest that the current "rulebooks" for how these cosmic nurseries work need a rewrite. The simple models don't explain why some old disks are still feeding fast while others have stopped, or why the size of the dust pile no longer predicts the feeding speed. It seems that by the time these stars reach their "teenage" years, the process of building planets has become much more complex and less uniform than previously thought.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.