Revisiting wormhole-induced global symmetry breaking
This paper argues that the conclusion that wormholes explicitly break global symmetries is premature, demonstrating that the ensemble average over symmetry-breaking parameters is typically dominated by the symmetric point due to doubly exponential suppression of other configurations, thereby resolving the conventional axion quality problem in standard Peccei–Quinn models.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Imagine the universe as a giant, cosmic game of "connect the dots," but instead of paper, the dots are different versions of reality. For a long time, physicists believed that in the ultimate rulebook of quantum gravity, there are no "global symmetries." Think of a global symmetry like a perfect, unbreakable rule that says, "No matter where you are in the universe, this specific dance move must always be the same." The old theory suggested that invisible, tunnel-like shortcuts through spacetime called wormholes act like mischievous pranksters. They slip through these tunnels, steal the "dance moves" from one universe, and drop them in another, effectively breaking the rule and ruining the symmetry.
This prankster behavior was thought to create a specific set of "knobs" or dials in the universe's settings, called -parameters. If these dials were turned to any number other than zero, the symmetry would be broken, and the universe would be a messy, rule-breaking place. This was particularly bad news for a particle called the axion (a candidate for dark matter), because if the symmetry protecting it was broken, the axion would behave in a way that contradicts what we see in experiments. This is known as the "axion quality problem."
The Big Twist: The Cosmic Vote
In this paper, Kiyoharu Kawana suggests that we've been looking at the pranksters all wrong. Just because the wormholes can turn the dials to random numbers doesn't mean they do.
Think of the -parameters not as fixed settings, but as a massive, cosmic voting booth. Every possible setting of the dials casts a vote. The paper argues that when you count all the votes (an "ensemble average"), the result isn't a chaotic mix. Instead, the vote is overwhelmingly dominated by a single, specific outcome: the dials stay at zero.
Why? The paper uses a concept called the "fine-tuning mechanism." Imagine a landscape of hills and valleys representing the energy of the universe. The system naturally wants to roll down to the lowest valley (the most stable state). The paper shows that for many types of matter (specifically those where the symmetry is already spontaneously broken, like in standard models), the deepest, most stable valley happens to be exactly where the dials are at zero.
The "Double-Exponential" Silence
What about the other dials? What if the wormholes try to turn them to non-zero numbers? The paper suggests that the universe effectively "silences" these options. The probability of the universe settling into a state where the dials are turned away from zero is suppressed by a factor so incredibly tiny it's hard to even imagine: .
To put that in perspective, if is a large number, this factor is like trying to find a single specific grain of sand on a beach, but then having to find that exact grain inside a beach that is itself made of grains of sand, repeated infinitely. It's a "doubly exponential" suppression. The paper argues that in the thermodynamic limit (when the universe is huge), the contributions from these broken-symmetry states are so negligible they might as well not exist.
The Verdict on the Axion
So, what does this mean for the axion? The paper concludes that in standard models where the symmetry is spontaneously broken, the "vote" of the universe lands squarely on the symmetric point ().
This suggests that the axion quality problem does not arise in this wormhole-induced theory. The wormholes don't break the symmetry because the universe's own energy structure forces the symmetry-breaking dials to stay at zero. The "pranksters" are effectively neutralized by the sheer weight of the universe's preference for stability.
What the Paper Does Not Say
It is important to note what this paper does not claim. It does not say that wormholes don't exist, nor does it say that global symmetries are always safe. The paper explicitly argues against the idea that the mere existence of the -parameters means the symmetry is broken. Instead, it suggests that the outcome depends on the specific phase structure of the matter in the universe.
The paper also doesn't claim to have measured this in a lab or simulated it on a supercomputer. Instead, it uses mathematical arguments and "toy models" (simplified versions of the universe) to show that under broad, reasonable situations, the symmetric point dominates. It suggests that the conventional view—that wormholes automatically break symmetries—is premature.
The Baby Universe Connection
The paper also touches on a concept called the "baby universe hypothesis," which suggests that tiny, disconnected universes (baby universes) might be popping in and out of existence. If there were many different baby universes, they could carry different values for these dials, leading to a loss of information. However, the paper suggests that even if there are many baby universes, the "fine-tuning" mechanism effectively selects just one specific state (the one where the dials are zero). In this way, the universe avoids the information loss problem, behaving as if there is only one baby universe, even if there are many.
In Summary
The paper proposes a new way to look at the universe's rules. Instead of wormholes being the agents that break global symmetries, the universe's own energy landscape acts like a magnet, pulling the symmetry-breaking parameters back to zero. This suggests that the axion might be safe after all, and the "axion quality problem" might be a non-issue in the wormhole-induced effective theory. The authors suggest that the fate of global symmetry isn't determined by the wormholes themselves, but by which "critical point" (the most stable state) wins the cosmic vote.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.