← Latest papers
🔢 mathematics

Inverses of Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers via Rational Indices

This paper extends previous work on rational-indexed Fibonacci numbers by deriving a general explicit formula via the codenominator function, establishing conditions for their relation to Lucas numbers, and proving the existence of multiplicative inverses for all Fibonacci and Lucas numbers within this framework.

Original authors: Zekiye Pinar Cihan, Ilker Inam

Published 2026-07-24
📖 1 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Zekiye Pinar Cihan, Ilker Inam

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Technical Summary: Inverses of Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers via Rational Indices

Problem Statement
The paper addresses the extension of classical Fibonacci (FnF_n) and Lucas (LnL_n) sequences to rational indices XQ>0X \in \mathbb{Q}_{>0}. While previous work by Uludağ and Gökmen (2022) established that rational-indexed Fibonacci numbers (FXF_X) can be expressed using the "codenominator" function FF, and that infinitely many such representations exist, the specific structural properties, explicit formulas for arbitrary rational indices, and the existence of multiplicative inverses within this framework remained to be fully characterized. The authors seek to derive general explicit formulas for FXF_X, determine conditions under which FXF_X coincides with classical Lucas numbers or deviates from the integer-indexed Fibonacci sequence, and prove the existence of multiplicative inverses for these numbers.

Methodology
The study relies on the codenominator function F:Q>0Z>0F: \mathbb{Q}_{>0} \to \mathbb{Z}_{>0}, defined recursively via the conumerator function. The function FF is constructed using properties of continued fractions. For a rational number X=[n0;n1,,nk]X = [n_0; n_1, \dots, n_k], the authors utilize the recursive relations of FF (specifically F(1+X)=F(1/X)F(1+X) = F(1/X) and F(11+X)=F(X)+F(1/X)F(\frac{1}{1+X}) = F(X) + F(1/X)) to decompose rational indices into integer components.

The methodology proceeds in three stages:

  1. Derivation of Explicit Formulas: The authors derive closed-form expressions for FXF_X where the continued fraction expansion of XX has lengths up to six. These formulas express FXF_X as linear combinations of classical Fibonacci (FnF_n) and Lucas (LnL_n) numbers with integer indices determined by the partial quotients of XX.
  2. Analysis of Coincidence and Divergence: By comparing the derived formulas against the definitions of classical sequences, the paper establishes precise conditions under which a rational-indexed value FXF_X equals a classical Fibonacci number, a Lucas number, or a distinct value.
  3. Inverse Computation: The authors investigate the inverses of these rational-indexed numbers. By computing FX1F_{X^{-1}} (where X1X^{-1} is the reciprocal of the index) and utilizing identities such as Cassini's identity and Binet's formulas, they demonstrate that the product of a rational-indexed number and its inverse yields a unit (specifically ±1\pm 1 modulo a related sequence term), thereby establishing the existence of multiplicative inverses.

Key Contributions and Results

  • General Explicit Formulas: The paper provides explicit formulas for FXF_X for continued fractions of length 2 through 6 (Lemmas 3.1–3.4) and a general recursive formula (Lemma 4.2) for arbitrary length kk. For example, for X=[n0;n1]X = [n_0; n_1], FX=Fn0Fn1+Fn01Fn1+1F_X = F_{n_0}F_{n_1} + F_{n_0-1}F_{n_1+1}.
  • Characterization of Values:
    • Coincidence with Classical Sequences: The paper proves that FXF_X coincides with a classical Fibonacci number FmF_m only under specific conditions (e.g., if the continued fraction length k=1k=1 and n0{1,2}n_0 \in \{1, 2\}, or if k=2k=2 and n0=1n_0=1 with specific constraints on n1n_1).
    • Coincidence with Lucas Numbers: It is shown that if X=[3;n]X = [3; n], then FX=Ln+1F_X = L_{n+1}. Similarly, F([2;1,n])=Ln+1F([2; 1, n]) = L_{n+1}.
    • Divergence: Corollary 6.1 establishes that for k3k \ge 3, or for k=1k=1 with n03n_0 \ge 3 (excluding the Lucas case), FXF_X is distinct from the classical Fibonacci sequence.
  • Existence of Multiplicative Inverses: The central result is the proof that every Fibonacci and Lucas number possesses a multiplicative inverse within the rational-indexed framework.
    • For Fm=F([1;m])F_m = F([1; m]), the inverse is Fm+2F_{m+2}.
    • For Fm=F([2;m2])F_m = F([2; m-2]), the inverse is Lm1L_{m-1}.
    • For Lm=L([3;m1])L_m = L([3; m-1]), the inverse is Lm+Fm+1L_m + F_{m+1}.
    • The paper demonstrates that FXFX1±1(modrelated term)F_X \cdot F_{X^{-1}} \equiv \pm 1 \pmod{\text{related term}}, confirming the unit property.

Significance
The authors claim that these results extend the rational-indexed viewpoint introduced by Uludağ and Gökmen by providing a systematic method to compute values and inverses for arbitrary rational indices. The work reveals new structural properties of Fibonacci- and Lucas-related sequences, specifically the ability to define and compute multiplicative inverses for these numbers through the codenominator function. The paper suggests that these findings open avenues for further number-theoretic exploration regarding the arithmetic properties of sequences under rational indexation, particularly in the context of modular arithmetic and continued fractions. The authors do not claim immediate applications outside of theoretical number theory but emphasize the enrichment of the algebraic understanding of these classical sequences.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →